Mechanism and effect of Re-curing on strength recovery of fire-damaged high strength engineered cementitious composite

This study presents novel investigation into the restoration of fire-damaged high strength engineered cementitious composites (HSECC) through re-curing, focusing on how factors like re-curing duration and binder material selection influence the strength recovery process. Five types of HSECC mixes constituting blends of ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBFS), fly ash, dolomite, silica fume, hybrid polyethylene and steel fibres were first exposed to temperatures ranging from 200°C-800°C, followed by three different types of re-curing including air curing for 28 days or water curing for 7–28 days. A comprehensive testing program was implemented, including detailed compressive stress-strain tests and microstructural analyses using techniques such as SEM, XRD, TG/DSC, and MIP to assess the effects of mix composition and curing methods. Test results showed that post-fire curing in air did not lead to any appreciable strength recovery with no clear evidence of rehydration after 28 days. On the contrary, curing in water resulted in substantial strength recovery, particularly in specimens exposed to 400–600°C, where recovered strength even exceeded the room temperature strength. Microstructural analysis confirmed that water curing promotes the formation of rehydration products, such as ettringite and portlandite, which effectively fill microcracks and voids caused by fibre melting, resulting in a refined pore-size distribution. Although all mixes showed significant recovery after water re-curing, the extent recovery was influenced by the severity of initial thermal damage. These effects were also found to be closely related to the binder type, with GGBFS-based mixes demonstrating superior performance. The study further proposes a possible mechanism for the re-curing process based on these findings. • Study focuses on the restoration of fire-damaged ECC through re-curing. • Effect of three re-curing methods on strength recovery of ECC was analysed. • Investigation of binder materials was conducted on strength recovery of ECC. • GGBFS mixes exhibited over 95 % compressive strength recovery at 400–600°C. • Mechanism was analysed via SEM, XRD, TG/DSC, and MIP.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Construction and Building Materials
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.139920
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Fire effects on concrete materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.72
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mechanism and effect of Re-curing on strength recovery of fire-damaged high strength engineered cementitious composite

S. Rawat, Daniel J. Fanna, Lijo George, C.K. Lee et al.
6 citations
Construction and Building Materials
Fire effects on concrete materials
5.72
article

Mechanism and effect of Re-curing on strength recovery of fire-damaged high strength engineered cementitious composite

S. Rawat, Daniel J. Fanna, Lijo George, C.K. Lee, Y.X. Zhang
article en
6 citations

Abstract

This study presents novel investigation into the restoration of fire-damaged high strength engineered cementitious composites (HSECC) through re-curing, focusing on how factors like re-curing duration and binder material selection influence the strength recovery process. Five types of HSECC mixes constituting blends of ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBFS), fly ash, dolomite, silica fume, hybrid polyethylene and steel fibres were first exposed to temperatures ranging from 200°C-800°C, followed by three different types of re-curing including air curing for 28 days or water curing for 7–28 days. A comprehensive testing program was implemented, including detailed compressive stress-strain tests and microstructural analyses using techniques such as SEM, XRD, TG/DSC, and MIP to assess the effects of mix composition and curing methods. Test results showed that post-fire curing in air did not lead to any appreciable strength recovery with no clear evidence of rehydration after 28 days. On the contrary, curing in water resulted in substantial strength recovery, particularly in specimens exposed to 400–600°C, where recovered strength even exceeded the room temperature strength. Microstructural analysis confirmed that water curing promotes the formation of rehydration products, such as ettringite and portlandite, which effectively fill microcracks and voids caused by fibre melting, resulting in a refined pore-size distribution. Although all mixes showed significant recovery after water re-curing, the extent recovery was influenced by the severity of initial thermal damage. These effects were also found to be closely related to the binder type, with GGBFS-based mixes demonstrating superior performance. The study further proposes a possible mechanism for the re-curing process based on these findings. • Study focuses on the restoration of fire-damaged ECC through re-curing. • Effect of three re-curing methods on strength recovery of ECC was analysed. • Investigation of binder materials was conducted on strength recovery of ECC. • GGBFS mixes exhibited over 95 % compressive strength recovery at 400–600°C. • Mechanism was analysed via SEM, XRD, TG/DSC, and MIP.

Construction and Building MaterialsVol. 461
University of Canberra (AU), UNSW Sydney (AU), Western Sydney University (AU)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Fire effects on concrete materials
5.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.