Relation of income to trends in well-being by age: implications for the future older “forgotten” lower middle class

The structure of social welfare policy has neglected a growing and increasingly economically marginalized segment of the American population-the lower middle class, a large group who are ineligible for many need-based social services. We examined 20-year time trends in physical well-being, mental well-being, and functional well-being by levels of household income. Our descriptive study used data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System and is representative of the population of the United States, ages 40 to 74, from 2003 to 2022 (<i>n</i> = 5 308 256). We found dramatic and consistent differences in trends in well-being by income category. While well-being generally got worse over the 20-year period for all ages, the declines were most pronounced for lower-middle-income households for individuals age 50 to 59. These differential trends by income were similar for all 3 of the measures of well-being we examined, but were most different by income level for physical well-being and functional well-being. No major trends or levels were explained by race, body mass index, or smoking. If the observed trends persist, the current age 50-59-year-old lower-middle-income population will enter retirement ages with substantially worse well-being than previous generations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Affairs Scholar
Published
2025-01-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxae183
Primary Topic
Employment and Welfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Relation of income to trends in well-being by age: implications for the future older “forgotten” lower middle class

Frank F. Furstenberg, S. Jay Olshansky, Cynthia Chen, John W. Rowe et al.
Health Affairs Scholar
Employment and Welfare Studies
article

Relation of income to trends in well-being by age: implications for the future older “forgotten” lower middle class

Frank F. Furstenberg, S. Jay Olshansky, Cynthia Chen, John W. Rowe, Laura L. Carstensen, Julie Zissimopoulos, Toni C. Antonucci, Dana P. Goldman, Christian Jackson, Axel Börsch‐Supan, Linda P. Fried, David H. Rehkopf, Martin Kohli, Lisa Berkman
article en

Abstract

The structure of social welfare policy has neglected a growing and increasingly economically marginalized segment of the American population-the lower middle class, a large group who are ineligible for many need-based social services. We examined 20-year time trends in physical well-being, mental well-being, and functional well-being by levels of household income. Our descriptive study used data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System and is representative of the population of the United States, ages 40 to 74, from 2003 to 2022 (<i>n</i> = 5 308 256). We found dramatic and consistent differences in trends in well-being by income category. While well-being generally got worse over the 20-year period for all ages, the declines were most pronounced for lower-middle-income households for individuals age 50 to 59. These differential trends by income were similar for all 3 of the measures of well-being we examined, but were most different by income level for physical well-being and functional well-being. No major trends or levels were explained by race, body mass index, or smoking. If the observed trends persist, the current age 50-59-year-old lower-middle-income population will enter retirement ages with substantially worse well-being than previous generations.

Health Affairs ScholarVol. 3(2)
California University of Pennsylvania (US), Research Network (United States) (US), Columbia University (US), University of Pennsylvania (US), Stanford University (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Employment and Welfare Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.