Examination of Useful Formulation Standards in Japan: Stimulating Reduced Medical Costs with a Low-Dose Standard for Cabazitaxel in Prostate Cancer Treatment

Discarding expensive anticancer drugs during preparation can lead to substantial economic losses. This study aimed to identify a practical formulation standard for preparing the prostate cancer drug cabazitaxel (CBZ) by comparing healthcare cost savings with the current standard and assuming the existence of a low-dose standard formulation. We retrospectively reviewed the electronic medical records of body surface area, total number of treatments, and volume discarded. With five different low-dose standard vials (50, 40, 30, 20, and 10 mg), we calculated and compared the total number of treatments assigned to the existing 60-mg vials, amount discarded, cost of drugs, and closed drug transfer systems for each standard as medical costs. The median disposal was lower for the 10 (4.1 mg), 50 (9.3 mg), and 20 (14.3 mg) mg vials than that for the 60-mg vials (28.2 mg; all P < 0.01). The median disposal was the lowest for the 10-mg vial (4.1 mg), followed by the 20- and 40-mg vials (both 8.2 mg), compared with the 60-mg vial (28.2 mg; all P < 0.01). The median medical cost was lowest for the 40-mg vial (¥ 354,899) compared with the 60-mg vial (¥ 511,456; P < 0.01), indicating that the practical formulation standard for CBZ preparation should be 40-mg vial. Using the same technique and preparation time as the marketed formulation can reduce medical costs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Iryo Yakugaku (Japanese Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences)
Published
2024-08-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5649/jjphcs.50.404
Primary Topic
Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Examination of Useful Formulation Standards in Japan: Stimulating Reduced Medical Costs with a Low-Dose Standard for Cabazitaxel in Prostate Cancer Treatment

M Kimura, Mitsuhiro Nishimura, Hiroki Asano, Eiseki Usami et al.
Iryo Yakugaku (Japanese Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences)
Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology
article

Examination of Useful Formulation Standards in Japan: Stimulating Reduced Medical Costs with a Low-Dose Standard for Cabazitaxel in Prostate Cancer Treatment

M Kimura, Mitsuhiro Nishimura, Hiroki Asano, Eiseki Usami, Koki Mori
article en

Abstract

Discarding expensive anticancer drugs during preparation can lead to substantial economic losses. This study aimed to identify a practical formulation standard for preparing the prostate cancer drug cabazitaxel (CBZ) by comparing healthcare cost savings with the current standard and assuming the existence of a low-dose standard formulation. We retrospectively reviewed the electronic medical records of body surface area, total number of treatments, and volume discarded. With five different low-dose standard vials (50, 40, 30, 20, and 10 mg), we calculated and compared the total number of treatments assigned to the existing 60-mg vials, amount discarded, cost of drugs, and closed drug transfer systems for each standard as medical costs. The median disposal was lower for the 10 (4.1 mg), 50 (9.3 mg), and 20 (14.3 mg) mg vials than that for the 60-mg vials (28.2 mg; all P < 0.01). The median disposal was the lowest for the 10-mg vial (4.1 mg), followed by the 20- and 40-mg vials (both 8.2 mg), compared with the 60-mg vial (28.2 mg; all P < 0.01). The median medical cost was lowest for the 40-mg vial (¥ 354,899) compared with the 60-mg vial (¥ 511,456; P < 0.01), indicating that the practical formulation standard for CBZ preparation should be 40-mg vial. Using the same technique and preparation time as the marketed formulation can reduce medical costs.

Iryo Yakugaku (Japanese Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences)Vol. 50(8)
Ogaki Municipal Hospital (JP)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.