Oil, life, and everyday fossil fascism: appropriative signification in U.S. petroleum supremacy

Abstract Fossil fuels face an uncertain future, but they have strong adherents as well as detractors. Even as California debates halting oil extraction, the Biden administration approved large new drilling projects on federal land, in keeping with the United States’ policy of “energy independence” (also called “energy dominance” under Trump). This article examines the Janus face of fossil fuels’ future, reading recent cultural moments in the western US. It shows oil producers (oil lobbyists and oil workers) appropriating acts of signification that affirm life (in particular, in domains of civil rights and environmental justice), inverting language and aesthetics of liberation and resistance to circulate microfascist petroleum supremacy. Such projections of strength may belie a moment of existential precarity for the industry, but these weaponized cultural significations still aim to do harm.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Communication Culture and Critique
Published
2025-01-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ccc/tcae055
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Geographies of human-animal interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
13.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Oil, life, and everyday fossil fascism: appropriative signification in U.S. petroleum supremacy

Christina Dunbar-Hester
2 citations
Communication Culture and Critique
Geographies of human-animal interactions
13.44
article

Oil, life, and everyday fossil fascism: appropriative signification in U.S. petroleum supremacy

Christina Dunbar-Hester
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Fossil fuels face an uncertain future, but they have strong adherents as well as detractors. Even as California debates halting oil extraction, the Biden administration approved large new drilling projects on federal land, in keeping with the United States’ policy of “energy independence” (also called “energy dominance” under Trump). This article examines the Janus face of fossil fuels’ future, reading recent cultural moments in the western US. It shows oil producers (oil lobbyists and oil workers) appropriating acts of signification that affirm life (in particular, in domains of civil rights and environmental justice), inverting language and aesthetics of liberation and resistance to circulate microfascist petroleum supremacy. Such projections of strength may belie a moment of existential precarity for the industry, but these weaponized cultural significations still aim to do harm.

Communication Culture and CritiqueVol. 18(1)
University of Southern California (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Geographies of human-animal interactions
13.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Oil, life, and everyday fossil fascism: appropriative signification in U.S. petroleum supremacy — Christina Dunbar-Hester · Communication Culture and Critique (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS