Phase-field models for ductile fatigue fracture

Fatigue fracture is one of the main causes of failure in structures. However, the simulation of fatigue crack growth is computationally demanding due to the large number of load cycles involved. Metals in the low cycle fatigue range often show significant plastic zones at the crack tip, calling for elastic–plastic material models, which increase the computation time even further. In pursuit of a more efficient model, we propose a simplified phase-field model for ductile fatigue fracture, which indirectly accounts for plasticity within the fatigue damage accumulation. Additionally, a cycle-skipping approach is inherent to the concept, reducing computation time by up to several orders of magnitude. We show that the proposed model is in fact a direct simplification of a phase-field model with elastic–plastic material behavior. We validate this simplified model in two ways: First, we show that it can reproduce the main characteristics of fatigue crack growth. Secondly, we compare it to a reference phase-field model with a conventional elastic–plastic material routine, nonlinear hardening and a fatigue variable based on the strain energy density. The comparison shows that for moderate load amplitudes, the simplified model approximates the stress state at the crack tip well. The same is true for size and shape of the plastic zone and the approximation of the crack driving force. The model’s limitations lie in the modeling of the stress redistribution due to plasticity. Both model variants are parametrized with experimentally determined values for elastic, plastic, fracture and fatigue properties of AA2024 T351 aluminum sheet material. • Simplified phase-field model for ductile fatigue fracture. • Approximation of stress–strain behavior with cyclic experimental data. • Comparison to conventional elastic–plastic model. • Savings in computation time of up to several order of magnitude compared to conventional model.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics
Published
2025-01-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2024.104842
Citations
16
Primary Topic
Numerical methods in engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
13.82

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Phase-field models for ductile fatigue fracture

Haim Waisman, Tom Schneider, Martha Kalina, Markus Kästner
16 citations
Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics
Numerical methods in engineering
13.82
article

Phase-field models for ductile fatigue fracture

Haim Waisman, Tom Schneider, Martha Kalina, Markus Kästner
article en
16 citations

Abstract

Fatigue fracture is one of the main causes of failure in structures. However, the simulation of fatigue crack growth is computationally demanding due to the large number of load cycles involved. Metals in the low cycle fatigue range often show significant plastic zones at the crack tip, calling for elastic–plastic material models, which increase the computation time even further. In pursuit of a more efficient model, we propose a simplified phase-field model for ductile fatigue fracture, which indirectly accounts for plasticity within the fatigue damage accumulation. Additionally, a cycle-skipping approach is inherent to the concept, reducing computation time by up to several orders of magnitude. We show that the proposed model is in fact a direct simplification of a phase-field model with elastic–plastic material behavior. We validate this simplified model in two ways: First, we show that it can reproduce the main characteristics of fatigue crack growth. Secondly, we compare it to a reference phase-field model with a conventional elastic–plastic material routine, nonlinear hardening and a fatigue variable based on the strain energy density. The comparison shows that for moderate load amplitudes, the simplified model approximates the stress state at the crack tip well. The same is true for size and shape of the plastic zone and the approximation of the crack driving force. The model’s limitations lie in the modeling of the stress redistribution due to plasticity. Both model variants are parametrized with experimentally determined values for elastic, plastic, fracture and fatigue properties of AA2024 T351 aluminum sheet material. • Simplified phase-field model for ductile fatigue fracture. • Approximation of stress–strain behavior with cyclic experimental data. • Comparison to conventional elastic–plastic model. • Savings in computation time of up to several order of magnitude compared to conventional model.

Theoretical and Applied Fracture MechanicsVol. 136
Columbia University (US), Technische Universität Dresden (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Numerical methods in engineering
13.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.