Performance Comparison of Loop Source and Grounded-Wire Source for Shallow Refined TEM Detection

Loop-source transient electromagnetic method (TEM) and grounded-wire-source TEM are two of the most popular methods in geological electromagnetic detection. Advances in power electronics have made it possible to achieve high magnetic moments by transmitting large current pulses through small excitation coils, enabling the use of independent loop sources as magnetic dipoles in active detection techniques. The independent loop source, by overcoming the attenuation of the magnetic field caused by distance, becomes an efficient and low-cost tool for shallow detection. Both the independent loop source and the grounded-wire source share similarities in detection principles and scanning modes. This paper discusses the merits and shortcomings of the loop source and grounded-wire source for shallow, multiscale refined detection. The three-dimensional model is established and the electromagnetic response characteristics are compared by COMSOL finite element simulation software. Additionally, the influence of anomalous burial depth, offset distance, and measurement height on the detection results of these two near-source methods are thoroughly discussed. Finally, it is explained by the field measurement results. The comparison of simulation and experimental results shows that the loop-source TEM is more suitable for shallow refined detection in terms of response quality and construction efficiency.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Access
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2025.3527870
Primary Topic
Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance Comparison of Loop Source and Grounded-Wire Source for Shallow Refined TEM Detection

Zhengyu Xu, Jiangying Peng, Xiao Ma, Wei Liu et al.
2 links
IEEE Access
Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
article

Performance Comparison of Loop Source and Grounded-Wire Source for Shallow Refined TEM Detection

Zhengyu Xu, Jiangying Peng, Xiao Ma, Wei Liu, Guofeng Zhao
article en

Abstract

Loop-source transient electromagnetic method (TEM) and grounded-wire-source TEM are two of the most popular methods in geological electromagnetic detection. Advances in power electronics have made it possible to achieve high magnetic moments by transmitting large current pulses through small excitation coils, enabling the use of independent loop sources as magnetic dipoles in active detection techniques. The independent loop source, by overcoming the attenuation of the magnetic field caused by distance, becomes an efficient and low-cost tool for shallow detection. Both the independent loop source and the grounded-wire source share similarities in detection principles and scanning modes. This paper discusses the merits and shortcomings of the loop source and grounded-wire source for shallow, multiscale refined detection. The three-dimensional model is established and the electromagnetic response characteristics are compared by COMSOL finite element simulation software. Additionally, the influence of anomalous burial depth, offset distance, and measurement height on the detection results of these two near-source methods are thoroughly discussed. Finally, it is explained by the field measurement results. The comparison of simulation and experimental results shows that the loop-source TEM is more suitable for shallow refined detection in terms of response quality and construction efficiency.

IEEE AccessVol. 13
Chongqing University (CN), Geological Exploration Technology Institute of Jiangsu Province (CN)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 100%
Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.