Use of plasma p‐tau217 as a pre‐screening method for detecting amyloid‐PET positivity in cognitively unimpaired participants: A multicenter study

Abstract Background Recent results from clinical trials in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) emphasize the importance of treating early‐stage disease. However, recruitment of preclinical AD participants is difficult due to the lack of symptoms, and the costs and/or invasiveness of established CSF and PET tests. We aimed to investigate whether plasma p‐tau217 could be used to pre‐screen cognitively unimpaired (CU) potential participants for amyloid‐β (Aβ) pathology to improve the efficiency of clinical trial recruitment. Method We included 1,471 CU participants from eight cohorts (Table 1) with available plasma p‐tau217, Aβ CSF biomarkers and Aβ‐PET status (served as standard‐of‐truth). Plasma p‐tau217 concentrations were z‐scored based on Aβ‐negative participants and harmonized across cohorts using neuroCombat. Cut‐offs for plasma p‐tau217 were derived in the BioFINDER‐1 cohort (n=104) based on different specificity levels (90%, 95% and 97.5%) to maximize positive predictive values (PPV). These cut‐offs were used in the other cohorts to assess the accuracy of plasma p‐tau217 for detecting Aβ‐PET positivity. Next, within plasma positive participants only, we evaluated the value of dichotomized Aβ CSF (based on established clinical thresholds) on assessing Aβ‐PET positivity. All models included age and APOE‐ε4 carriership as covariates. Result 334 (24.4%) of participants were Aβ‐PET positive. Using the a priori defined cutoffs, plasma p‐tau217 categorization resulted in high PPVs (72.9%‐81.2%), negative predictive values (NPVs, 82.5%‐86.2%), and accuracy (82.4%‐83.8%), with an overall rate of positivity between 10.9%‐18.1% (Figure 1). When applying CSF biomarkers to the plasma positive participants in a second step, the PPVs increased up to 90.8%‐95.3%, with NPVs ranging between 82.8%‐86.7% and accuracies between 84.0%‐87.3%, with a slight decrease in the proportion of overall positive cases (9.3%‐14.3% from the original sample) given that the CSF positivity in the plasma positive participants ranged between 79.4%‐85.2% (Figure 2). Conclusion Plasma p‐tau217 can identify Aβ‐PET positive CU individuals with PPVs reaching 81%, which can be further improved to PPVs of up to 95% with a subsequent CSF measurement. Plasma p‐tau217 could be used, either as stand‐alone biomarker, or as an initial step before CSF biomarkers (reducing their need by ∼80‐90%), for pre‐screening in clinical trials of preclinical AD depending on the certainty needed for Aβ‐PET positivity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.085773
Primary Topic
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Use of plasma p‐tau217 as a pre‐screening method for detecting amyloid‐PET positivity in cognitively unimpaired participants: A multicenter study

Tammie L.S. Benzinger, Joseph Therriault, Alexa Pichet Binette, Sebastian Palmqvist et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
article

Use of plasma p‐tau217 as a pre‐screening method for detecting amyloid‐PET positivity in cognitively unimpaired participants: A multicenter study

Tammie L.S. Benzinger, Joseph Therriault, Alexa Pichet Binette, Sebastian Palmqvist, Rik Ossenkoppele, Erik Stomrud, Kaj Blennow, Wagner S. Brum, Niklas Mattsson, Oskar Hansson, Gemma Salvadó, Juan Domingo Gispert, Sylvia Villeneuve, Shorena Janelidze, Marc Suárez‐Calvet, Pedro Rosa‐Neto, Sterling C. Johnson, Suzanne E. Schindler
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Recent results from clinical trials in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) emphasize the importance of treating early‐stage disease. However, recruitment of preclinical AD participants is difficult due to the lack of symptoms, and the costs and/or invasiveness of established CSF and PET tests. We aimed to investigate whether plasma p‐tau217 could be used to pre‐screen cognitively unimpaired (CU) potential participants for amyloid‐β (Aβ) pathology to improve the efficiency of clinical trial recruitment. Method We included 1,471 CU participants from eight cohorts (Table 1) with available plasma p‐tau217, Aβ CSF biomarkers and Aβ‐PET status (served as standard‐of‐truth). Plasma p‐tau217 concentrations were z‐scored based on Aβ‐negative participants and harmonized across cohorts using neuroCombat. Cut‐offs for plasma p‐tau217 were derived in the BioFINDER‐1 cohort (n=104) based on different specificity levels (90%, 95% and 97.5%) to maximize positive predictive values (PPV). These cut‐offs were used in the other cohorts to assess the accuracy of plasma p‐tau217 for detecting Aβ‐PET positivity. Next, within plasma positive participants only, we evaluated the value of dichotomized Aβ CSF (based on established clinical thresholds) on assessing Aβ‐PET positivity. All models included age and APOE‐ε4 carriership as covariates. Result 334 (24.4%) of participants were Aβ‐PET positive. Using the a priori defined cutoffs, plasma p‐tau217 categorization resulted in high PPVs (72.9%‐81.2%), negative predictive values (NPVs, 82.5%‐86.2%), and accuracy (82.4%‐83.8%), with an overall rate of positivity between 10.9%‐18.1% (Figure 1). When applying CSF biomarkers to the plasma positive participants in a second step, the PPVs increased up to 90.8%‐95.3%, with NPVs ranging between 82.8%‐86.7% and accuracies between 84.0%‐87.3%, with a slight decrease in the proportion of overall positive cases (9.3%‐14.3% from the original sample) given that the CSF positivity in the plasma positive participants ranged between 79.4%‐85.2% (Figure 2). Conclusion Plasma p‐tau217 can identify Aβ‐PET positive CU individuals with PPVs reaching 81%, which can be further improved to PPVs of up to 95% with a subsequent CSF measurement. Plasma p‐tau217 could be used, either as stand‐alone biomarker, or as an initial step before CSF biomarkers (reducing their need by ∼80‐90%), for pre‐screening in clinical trials of preclinical AD depending on the certainty needed for Aβ‐PET positivity.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S2)
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (BR), University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), Universitat Pompeu Fabra (ES), Lund University (SE), Washington University in St. Louis (US), Douglas Mental Health University Institute (CA), Sahlgrenska University Hospital (SE), Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ES), Alzheimer Society of Canada (CA), Spanish National Centre for Cardiovascular Research (ES), Biomedical Research Networking Center in Bioengineering, Biomaterials and Nanomedicine (ES), Pasqual Maragall Foundation (ES), Amsterdam Neuroscience (NL), Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (ES), Hospital Del Mar (ES), Prevent Alzheimer’s Disease 2020 (US), Skåne University Hospital (SE), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Fragilidad y Envejecimiento Saludable (ES), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), McGill University (CA), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL), University of Gothenburg (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.