Precision Medicine for Treating Alzheimer’s Disease in Down Syndrome

Abstract Background Individuals with Down Syndrome (DS) exhibit a genetic form of Alzheimer's disease (AD). In this study, we leveraged biobanked plasma samples from a completed clinical trial focused on anti‐inflammatory treatment, Vitamin E, for DS. The trial's primary endpoint was on cognition, and Vitamin E treatment was not found to be significantly beneficial. We examined whether applying precision medicine using an established proinflammatory endophenotype algorithm for AD therapy would reveal responders to anti‐inflammatory therapy as we have with other AD within the DS trial sample. Method We utilized biobanked plasma samples from the Phase 3 clinical trial titled "Vitamin E in Aged Persons with Down Syndrome (NCT00056329)." A pro‐inflammatory panel of proteins, including pre‐defined predictive protein and neuropathology markers, were assayed in baseline (n=138) and 36‐month (n=138) plasma samples. Response status was determined by evaluating the annual rate of change as measured by a combination of primary and secondary endpoints (BPT, VT, and BFDS). The predictive biomarker profile was established through SVM analyses to predict treatment response (yes/no) as the outcome variable. Result Pro‐inflammatory biomarkers IFN, IL10, IL12p70, 1L13, IL1B, IL2, IL4, IL6, IL8, and TNF𝛼 (along with APOE4 and demographic factors) were highly accurate in predicting the treatment responders with an AUC of 99.41%. Neuropathology markers, including Aβ40, Aβ42, Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio, NfL, GFAP, total tau, pTau181, and pTau231 with added demographic and APOE factors, predicted the responder status with an AUC of 73.98%. When the inflammatory and neuropathological data were combined into one algorithm, it produced an AUC of 97.35% (sensitivity of 81.69%, specificity of 100%) with an optimized cut‐off of 0.442 for distinguishing responder status. Conclusion Our findings confirmed the utility of our established AD pro‐inflammatory endophenotype for use in the DS population. We demonstrate that a protein algorithm encompassing markers related to inflammation and neuropathology can be used to generate a predictive biomarker endophenotype that can identify DS participants who are more likely to respond and benefit from anti‐inflammatory treatment. Our results demonstrate the feasibility of using precision medicine approaches for treating AD in DS. Our ongoing studies focus on understanding how these predictive algorithms relate to neuropathological progression in DS.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.093181
Primary Topic
Clusterin in disease pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Precision Medicine for Treating Alzheimer’s Disease in Down Syndrome

Howard Andrews, Robert A. Rissman, Michael S. Rafii, Sid E. O’Bryant et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Clusterin in disease pathology
article

Precision Medicine for Treating Alzheimer’s Disease in Down Syndrome

Howard Andrews, Robert A. Rissman, Michael S. Rafii, Sid E. O’Bryant, Sonal Sukreet, Fan Zhang, Melissa Petersen, Elise K Kim, Mary Sano, Paul Aisen
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Individuals with Down Syndrome (DS) exhibit a genetic form of Alzheimer's disease (AD). In this study, we leveraged biobanked plasma samples from a completed clinical trial focused on anti‐inflammatory treatment, Vitamin E, for DS. The trial's primary endpoint was on cognition, and Vitamin E treatment was not found to be significantly beneficial. We examined whether applying precision medicine using an established proinflammatory endophenotype algorithm for AD therapy would reveal responders to anti‐inflammatory therapy as we have with other AD within the DS trial sample. Method We utilized biobanked plasma samples from the Phase 3 clinical trial titled "Vitamin E in Aged Persons with Down Syndrome (NCT00056329)." A pro‐inflammatory panel of proteins, including pre‐defined predictive protein and neuropathology markers, were assayed in baseline (n=138) and 36‐month (n=138) plasma samples. Response status was determined by evaluating the annual rate of change as measured by a combination of primary and secondary endpoints (BPT, VT, and BFDS). The predictive biomarker profile was established through SVM analyses to predict treatment response (yes/no) as the outcome variable. Result Pro‐inflammatory biomarkers IFN, IL10, IL12p70, 1L13, IL1B, IL2, IL4, IL6, IL8, and TNF𝛼 (along with APOE4 and demographic factors) were highly accurate in predicting the treatment responders with an AUC of 99.41%. Neuropathology markers, including Aβ40, Aβ42, Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio, NfL, GFAP, total tau, pTau181, and pTau231 with added demographic and APOE factors, predicted the responder status with an AUC of 73.98%. When the inflammatory and neuropathological data were combined into one algorithm, it produced an AUC of 97.35% (sensitivity of 81.69%, specificity of 100%) with an optimized cut‐off of 0.442 for distinguishing responder status. Conclusion Our findings confirmed the utility of our established AD pro‐inflammatory endophenotype for use in the DS population. We demonstrate that a protein algorithm encompassing markers related to inflammation and neuropathology can be used to generate a predictive biomarker endophenotype that can identify DS participants who are more likely to respond and benefit from anti‐inflammatory treatment. Our results demonstrate the feasibility of using precision medicine approaches for treating AD in DS. Our ongoing studies focus on understanding how these predictive algorithms relate to neuropathological progression in DS.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S2)
University of Southern California (US), University of North Texas (US), Autism Research Institute (US), University of North Texas Health Science Center (US), University of California San Diego (US), Columbia University (US), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Clusterin in disease pathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.