Validation of Clinical Decision Support Recommendations of a Digital Cognitive Assessment by Expert Cognitive Neurologists

Abstract Background Disease‐modifying treatments for Alzheimer’s disease highlight the need for early detection of cognitive decline. However, most primary care providers do not currently perform routine cognitive testing, in part due to a lack of time and resources to administer and interpret the tests. Brief, self‐scoring, and sensitive digital cognitive assessments, such as the Linus Health Core Cognitive Evaluation (CCE)–which includes the Digital Clock and Recall (DCR™) and the Life and Health Questionnaire (LHQ)–can automatically provide medically‐informed recommendations that can address this need. Here we evaluate the clinical appropriateness of the recommendations generated by this clinical decision support (CDS) tool to guide the diagnosis of cognitive impairment by primary care providers (PCPs). Method The CDS tool uses data from the CCE to list potential medical concerns and recommend pathways toward formal diagnosis and/or care. We conducted a retrospective expert‐review study in June 2023 to evaluate the nine CDS pathways for patients aged 55 and above. Experts were five board‐certified cognitive neurologists affiliated with academic institutions. We calculated the median ratings (on a scale of 1 to 9, where 9 is high appropriateness) for the nine CDS pathways across raters. A rating of 7 or above was deemed clinically appropriate. Result All 7 pathways related to cognitive impairment received a clinically appropriate rating (median = 7, SD = 0.3, range=7‐8). Pathways below the appropriateness threshold included the one for Green DCR scores (i.e., cognitively unimpaired; median = 6, SD = 0.87) and a preliminary Lecanemab eligibility pathway (median = 5, SD = 1.10). Conclusion Pathways and the cognition‐related recommendations generated by the CDS tool of the Linus Health CCE are clinically appropriate, as rated by this initial survey of board‐certified, academic cognitive neurologists. The findings indicate the clinical utility of digital cognitive assessments such as the CCE for guiding the PCPs’ approach to diagnosis and management of patients with cognitive impairment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.092040
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation of Clinical Decision Support Recommendations of a Digital Cognitive Assessment by Expert Cognitive Neurologists

David Westfall Bates, Ali Jannati, Russell Banks, John Showalter et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Validation of Clinical Decision Support Recommendations of a Digital Cognitive Assessment by Expert Cognitive Neurologists

David Westfall Bates, Ali Jannati, Russell Banks, John Showalter, Álvaro Pascual‐Leone, Sean Tobyne, Claudio Toro‐Serey, Joyce Rios Gomes‐Osman, William Isaiah Morrow, Marissa Ciesla
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Disease‐modifying treatments for Alzheimer’s disease highlight the need for early detection of cognitive decline. However, most primary care providers do not currently perform routine cognitive testing, in part due to a lack of time and resources to administer and interpret the tests. Brief, self‐scoring, and sensitive digital cognitive assessments, such as the Linus Health Core Cognitive Evaluation (CCE)–which includes the Digital Clock and Recall (DCR™) and the Life and Health Questionnaire (LHQ)–can automatically provide medically‐informed recommendations that can address this need. Here we evaluate the clinical appropriateness of the recommendations generated by this clinical decision support (CDS) tool to guide the diagnosis of cognitive impairment by primary care providers (PCPs). Method The CDS tool uses data from the CCE to list potential medical concerns and recommend pathways toward formal diagnosis and/or care. We conducted a retrospective expert‐review study in June 2023 to evaluate the nine CDS pathways for patients aged 55 and above. Experts were five board‐certified cognitive neurologists affiliated with academic institutions. We calculated the median ratings (on a scale of 1 to 9, where 9 is high appropriateness) for the nine CDS pathways across raters. A rating of 7 or above was deemed clinically appropriate. Result All 7 pathways related to cognitive impairment received a clinically appropriate rating (median = 7, SD = 0.3, range=7‐8). Pathways below the appropriateness threshold included the one for Green DCR scores (i.e., cognitively unimpaired; median = 6, SD = 0.87) and a preliminary Lecanemab eligibility pathway (median = 5, SD = 1.10). Conclusion Pathways and the cognition‐related recommendations generated by the CDS tool of the Linus Health CCE are clinically appropriate, as rated by this initial survey of board‐certified, academic cognitive neurologists. The findings indicate the clinical utility of digital cognitive assessments such as the CCE for guiding the PCPs’ approach to diagnosis and management of patients with cognitive impairment.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S2)
Harvard University (US), University of Miami (US), Hebrew SeniorLife (US), Michigan State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.