Superiority of p‐tau217 among plasma biomarkers in diagnostic accuracy in non‐demented persons from the Geneva Memory Center cohort

Abstract Background The identification of Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathology at an early stage utilizing plasma biomarkers has attracted significant interest due to its potential for improving global screening programs. Different forms of p‐tau measured in plasma, mainly p‐tau217, have demonstrated similar diagnostic accuracy when compared to traditional biomarkers. Moreover, plasma biomarkers associated with neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration, namely GFAP and NfL, respectively, have been found to be elevated in patients with amyloidosis and tau accumulation, even though these conditions are not exclusive to AD. Method Our goal was to see if there were any differences in plasma biomarkers between amyloid (A+) and tau (T+) positive groups based on PET scans and compare their diagnostic accuracy in a Geneva Memory Center non‐demented group. Plasma, amyloid‐PET, and tau‐PET were assessed in a total of 100 subjects (CU = 33; MCI = 67). Plasma biomarkers included were p‐tau217, p‐tau231, p‐tau181, GFAP, and NfL. The differences in each plasma biomarker among A+/T+ groups were tested using Kruskal‐Wallis tests. Additionally, we calculated the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and underlying area under the curve (AUC) in A+ and T+. Result All plasma biomarkers revealed significant differences between A‐/T‐ and A+/T+ (p < 0.05), where p‐tau217 showed a higher effect size (δ = 0.98) in comparison with other biomarkers (δ range = 0.31 ‐ 0.67). Moreover, p‐tau217 was the only biomarker displaying significant differences between A‐/T‐ and A+/T‐ (p < 0.001; δ = 0.89). Lastly, p‐tau217 showed a higher AUC for detecting amyloid and tau (AUC average = 0.96) than other p‐tau forms (AUC average = 0.77) and GFAP/NfL (AUC average = 0.69). Conclusion Plasma p‐tau217 revealed superior performance in AD pathology detection when compared to other p‐tau forms and plasma biomarkers of neuroinflammation/neurodegeneration. Our results suggest the potential of p‐tau217 to identify AD pathology in a non‐demented population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.088800
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.39
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Superiority of p‐tau217 among plasma biomarkers in diagnostic accuracy in non‐demented persons from the Geneva Memory Center cohort

Nicholas James Ashton, Frédéric Assal, Kaj Blennow, Augusto J. Mendes et al.
1 citations
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
0.39
article

Superiority of p‐tau217 among plasma biomarkers in diagnostic accuracy in non‐demented persons from the Geneva Memory Center cohort

Nicholas James Ashton, Frédéric Assal, Kaj Blennow, Augusto J. Mendes, Max Scheffler, Valentina Garibotto, Oskar Hansson, Giovanni Battista Frisoni, Aurélien Lathuilière, Federica Ribaldi, Henrik Zetterberg, Shorena Janelidze
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background The identification of Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathology at an early stage utilizing plasma biomarkers has attracted significant interest due to its potential for improving global screening programs. Different forms of p‐tau measured in plasma, mainly p‐tau217, have demonstrated similar diagnostic accuracy when compared to traditional biomarkers. Moreover, plasma biomarkers associated with neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration, namely GFAP and NfL, respectively, have been found to be elevated in patients with amyloidosis and tau accumulation, even though these conditions are not exclusive to AD. Method Our goal was to see if there were any differences in plasma biomarkers between amyloid (A+) and tau (T+) positive groups based on PET scans and compare their diagnostic accuracy in a Geneva Memory Center non‐demented group. Plasma, amyloid‐PET, and tau‐PET were assessed in a total of 100 subjects (CU = 33; MCI = 67). Plasma biomarkers included were p‐tau217, p‐tau231, p‐tau181, GFAP, and NfL. The differences in each plasma biomarker among A+/T+ groups were tested using Kruskal‐Wallis tests. Additionally, we calculated the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and underlying area under the curve (AUC) in A+ and T+. Result All plasma biomarkers revealed significant differences between A‐/T‐ and A+/T+ (p < 0.05), where p‐tau217 showed a higher effect size (δ = 0.98) in comparison with other biomarkers (δ range = 0.31 ‐ 0.67). Moreover, p‐tau217 was the only biomarker displaying significant differences between A‐/T‐ and A+/T‐ (p < 0.001; δ = 0.89). Lastly, p‐tau217 showed a higher AUC for detecting amyloid and tau (AUC average = 0.96) than other p‐tau forms (AUC average = 0.77) and GFAP/NfL (AUC average = 0.69). Conclusion Plasma p‐tau217 revealed superior performance in AD pathology detection when compared to other p‐tau forms and plasma biomarkers of neuroinflammation/neurodegeneration. Our results suggest the potential of p‐tau217 to identify AD pathology in a non‐demented population.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S2)
University of Geneva (CH), Lund University (SE), University Hospital of Geneva (CH), University of Gothenburg (SE)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
0.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.