Plasma biomarker trajectories: Relationship to AD genetic risk factors among cognitively unimpaired individuals

Abstract Background Few studies have examined how a range of potential modifiers may influence the trajectories of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) blood biomarkers in those who were cognitively unimpaired when first assessed. This study examined potential modifiers of longitudinal changes in plasma biomarkers, including genetic factors (i.e., APOE e4 allele and AD‐polygenic risk scores (PRS), demographics (age and sex), and follow‐up diagnoses (i.e., progression to MCI or dementia) among participants who were cognitively unimpaired at baseline. Method Analyses included a subset of BIOCARD Study participants who had all of the relevant measures of interest, including AD‐PRS (N = 133, M baseline age = 64.7y; 7.3 biomarker measures over 8.3 years of follow‐up; Table 1); 19 (14%) had progressed to MCI or dementia over time. These analyses focused on log‐transformed and standardized values of AB 42 /AB 40 , p‐tau 181 , NfL, GFAP, YKL‐40, and sTREM2 in plasma, measured using cobas Elecsys assays in the NeuroToolKit panel (Roche Diagnostics). Result In longitudinal mixed‐effects models, NfL, GFAP, YKL‐40, and TREM2 increased over time, whereas AB 42 /AB 40 decreased over time (Table 2). YKL‐40 increases were greater among individuals with higher AD‐PRS and rates of sTREM2 increase were attenuated among APOE e4 carriers. Additionally, baseline AB 42 /AB 40 levels were lower among APOE e4 carriers and baseline sTREM2 levels were lower in individuals with higher AD‐PRS. Older participants had more abnormal baseline biomarker levels, as well as greater rates of change in p‐tau 181 . Baseline GFAP and sTREM2 levels were higher among females, and rates of change in YKL‐40 were greater among males. In a separate set of models, with AD genetic risk factors covaried, those who progressed to MCI/dementia had more abnormal ptau 181 at baseline (Table 3) compared to those who remained cognitively unimpaired, but biomarker rates of change did not differ by follow‐up diagnosis. Conclusion Among initially cognitively unimpaired individuals, blood biomarkers were differentially related to APOE e4 genetic risk and AD‐PRS. Only YKL‐40 and sTREM2, each markers of neuroinflammation, demonstrated relationships with an AD‐PRS. Additional work is underway to explore whether lower sTREM2 values among cognitively unimpaired participants with higher AD genetic risk reflect reduced microglial activation during preclinical AD.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.090753
Primary Topic
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Plasma biomarker trajectories: Relationship to AD genetic risk factors among cognitively unimpaired individuals

Anja Soldan, Timothy J. Hohman, Jiangxia Wang, Marilyn Albert et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
article

Plasma biomarker trajectories: Relationship to AD genetic risk factors among cognitively unimpaired individuals

Anja Soldan, Timothy J. Hohman, Jiangxia Wang, Marilyn Albert, Kaj Blennow, Logan C. Dumitrescu, Corinne Pettigrew, Mei‐Cheng Wang, Abhay Moghekar, Tobias Bittner
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Few studies have examined how a range of potential modifiers may influence the trajectories of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) blood biomarkers in those who were cognitively unimpaired when first assessed. This study examined potential modifiers of longitudinal changes in plasma biomarkers, including genetic factors (i.e., APOE e4 allele and AD‐polygenic risk scores (PRS), demographics (age and sex), and follow‐up diagnoses (i.e., progression to MCI or dementia) among participants who were cognitively unimpaired at baseline. Method Analyses included a subset of BIOCARD Study participants who had all of the relevant measures of interest, including AD‐PRS (N = 133, M baseline age = 64.7y; 7.3 biomarker measures over 8.3 years of follow‐up; Table 1); 19 (14%) had progressed to MCI or dementia over time. These analyses focused on log‐transformed and standardized values of AB 42 /AB 40 , p‐tau 181 , NfL, GFAP, YKL‐40, and sTREM2 in plasma, measured using cobas Elecsys assays in the NeuroToolKit panel (Roche Diagnostics). Result In longitudinal mixed‐effects models, NfL, GFAP, YKL‐40, and TREM2 increased over time, whereas AB 42 /AB 40 decreased over time (Table 2). YKL‐40 increases were greater among individuals with higher AD‐PRS and rates of sTREM2 increase were attenuated among APOE e4 carriers. Additionally, baseline AB 42 /AB 40 levels were lower among APOE e4 carriers and baseline sTREM2 levels were lower in individuals with higher AD‐PRS. Older participants had more abnormal baseline biomarker levels, as well as greater rates of change in p‐tau 181 . Baseline GFAP and sTREM2 levels were higher among females, and rates of change in YKL‐40 were greater among males. In a separate set of models, with AD genetic risk factors covaried, those who progressed to MCI/dementia had more abnormal ptau 181 at baseline (Table 3) compared to those who remained cognitively unimpaired, but biomarker rates of change did not differ by follow‐up diagnosis. Conclusion Among initially cognitively unimpaired individuals, blood biomarkers were differentially related to APOE e4 genetic risk and AD‐PRS. Only YKL‐40 and sTREM2, each markers of neuroinflammation, demonstrated relationships with an AD‐PRS. Additional work is underway to explore whether lower sTREM2 values among cognitively unimpaired participants with higher AD genetic risk reflect reduced microglial activation during preclinical AD.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S2)
Roche (Switzerland) (CH), Johns Hopkins University (US), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US), Profu (Sweden) (SE), University of Gothenburg (SE), Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.