Inflammatory Architecture of Frailty in the Realm of Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias

Abstract Background As a risk factor for Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) in older adults, inflammatory mechanisms underlying physical frailty remain incompletely elucidated. This study aimed to characterize the inflammatory architecture of frailty and explore predictive implications of inflammatory signatures of frailty on ADRD. Method The study included 741 Framingham Heart Study Offspring cohort participants (52% female, mean 60 years range 40 to 85), dementia‐free at Exam 7 (1998‐2001), followed for incident dementia over 15.8 years on average. The sample was randomly split 50/50 into discovery and validation sets. A total of 209 circulating inflammatory markers including peripheral immune cells and inflammatory biomarkers were measured at Exam 7, with Fried frailty index assessed at Exam 8 (2005‐2008). Using frailty and its 5 components as outcomes, LASSO was conducted on inflammatory markers adjusted for covariates in discovery set. Inflammatory signatures were generated by summing the product of regression coefficients and marker levels for each participant. Pairwise associations between 6 signatures and incident dementia/AD were conducted by Cox models in validation set, with FDR ≤0.05 declaring significance. Result A total of 48 inflammatory markers were involved in signatures: 9 protein biomarkers (4E‐BP1, ADA, CCL3, CD40, CDCP1, HGF, IL‐10RB, IL‐12B, and IL‐17C) and 4 immune cells (CD4 T helper cells, CD4+FoxP3+, CD8+FoxP3+, and TREM2+ NCM) contributed to at least two signatures. In the validation set a handgrip‐strength‐specific signature was significantly associated with incident dementia (HR=0.50, 95%CI: (0.32, 0.76), FDR=0.01) and incident AD (HR=0.44, 95%CI: (0.25, 0.76), FDR=0.01), a walking speed‐specific signature was associated with incident dementia (HR=14.30, 95%CI: (3.67, 55.73), FDR=<0.01) and incident AD (HR=13.95, 95%CI: (2.65, 73.49), FDR=0.01). An unintended weight loss‐specific signature was significantly associated with incident dementia (HR=3.45, 95%CI: (1.09, 10.94), FDR=0.05), and exhaustion‐specific signature was associated with incident dementia (HR=4.12, 95%CI: (1.59, 10.69), FDR=0.01) and incident AD (HR=5.73, 95%CI: (1.84, 17.90), FDR=0.01), and overall frailty signature was associated with incident dementia (HR=2.33, 95%CI: (1.13, 4.84), FDR=0.04) and incident AD (HR=2.82, 95%CI: (1.08, 7.37), FDR=0.05). Conclusion Frailty‐implicated signatures unveil inflammatory markers related to the biology of frailty and ADRD. Future replication studies are needed to inform ADRD prediction signatures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.086499
Primary Topic
Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Inflammatory Architecture of Frailty in the Realm of Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias

Ahmed Ragab, Joanne M. Murabito, Margaret F. Doyle, Jiachen Chen et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
article

Inflammatory Architecture of Frailty in the Realm of Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias

Ahmed Ragab, Joanne M. Murabito, Margaret F. Doyle, Jiachen Chen, Kathryn L. Lunetta, Yumeng Cao
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background As a risk factor for Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) in older adults, inflammatory mechanisms underlying physical frailty remain incompletely elucidated. This study aimed to characterize the inflammatory architecture of frailty and explore predictive implications of inflammatory signatures of frailty on ADRD. Method The study included 741 Framingham Heart Study Offspring cohort participants (52% female, mean 60 years range 40 to 85), dementia‐free at Exam 7 (1998‐2001), followed for incident dementia over 15.8 years on average. The sample was randomly split 50/50 into discovery and validation sets. A total of 209 circulating inflammatory markers including peripheral immune cells and inflammatory biomarkers were measured at Exam 7, with Fried frailty index assessed at Exam 8 (2005‐2008). Using frailty and its 5 components as outcomes, LASSO was conducted on inflammatory markers adjusted for covariates in discovery set. Inflammatory signatures were generated by summing the product of regression coefficients and marker levels for each participant. Pairwise associations between 6 signatures and incident dementia/AD were conducted by Cox models in validation set, with FDR ≤0.05 declaring significance. Result A total of 48 inflammatory markers were involved in signatures: 9 protein biomarkers (4E‐BP1, ADA, CCL3, CD40, CDCP1, HGF, IL‐10RB, IL‐12B, and IL‐17C) and 4 immune cells (CD4 T helper cells, CD4+FoxP3+, CD8+FoxP3+, and TREM2+ NCM) contributed to at least two signatures. In the validation set a handgrip‐strength‐specific signature was significantly associated with incident dementia (HR=0.50, 95%CI: (0.32, 0.76), FDR=0.01) and incident AD (HR=0.44, 95%CI: (0.25, 0.76), FDR=0.01), a walking speed‐specific signature was associated with incident dementia (HR=14.30, 95%CI: (3.67, 55.73), FDR=<0.01) and incident AD (HR=13.95, 95%CI: (2.65, 73.49), FDR=0.01). An unintended weight loss‐specific signature was significantly associated with incident dementia (HR=3.45, 95%CI: (1.09, 10.94), FDR=0.05), and exhaustion‐specific signature was associated with incident dementia (HR=4.12, 95%CI: (1.59, 10.69), FDR=0.01) and incident AD (HR=5.73, 95%CI: (1.84, 17.90), FDR=0.01), and overall frailty signature was associated with incident dementia (HR=2.33, 95%CI: (1.13, 4.84), FDR=0.04) and incident AD (HR=2.82, 95%CI: (1.08, 7.37), FDR=0.05). Conclusion Frailty‐implicated signatures unveil inflammatory markers related to the biology of frailty and ADRD. Future replication studies are needed to inform ADRD prediction signatures.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S2)
Boston University (US), University of Vermont (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.