Effect of diagnostic and genetic status on the relationship between rs‐fMRI complexity and tau & amyloid PET in Alzheimer’s disease

Abstract Background Non‐linear statistical analyses on resting‐state fMRI (rs‐fMRI) using complexity measures have demonstrated progressive decline in complexity from cognitively normal subjects (CN) to patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) and patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD). While complexity has been shown to be negatively associated with tau‐PET, the association with amyloid or effects of genetic characteristics (APOE4) remains unknown. Method From the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI3) we identified participants with tabulated SUVR values for amyloid and tau as well as one resting state fMRI scan for the same visit. The rs‐fMRI complexity was calculated as Multiscale Sample Entropy (MSE) (r=0.5, m=2, scale=6). SUVR values from precuneus, parahippocampal, inferior temporal and entorhinal regions were used in a multivariate generalized linear model to investigate the adjusted independent effects to corresponding rs‐fMRI complexity. Whether such effects were modified by either diagnosis (CN, MCI, AD) or APOE4 status (# alleles) were tested using the interaction terms in the multivariate model. Age and gender were controlled for all models. Result The final cohort consisted of 127 subjects (Table 1). We observed statistically significant negative associations between complexity and tau in parahippocampus, inferior temporal gyrus and precuneus (Table 2A). Diagnostic status does not modify these associations, however, APOE4 status showed a statistically significant interaction effect for tau and complexity in precuneus (Table 2C). For amyloid no associations nor interaction effects were found (Table 2B). Conclusion Our study confirmed previously reported statistically significant inverse relationship between rs‐fMRI complexity and tau‐PET, which is indicative of disfunction of neuronal signaling in the presence of tauopathy. While diagnostic classification showed no effects, the APOE4 genetic risk had a strong modifying effect leading to a stronger negative relationship between tau‐PET and fMRI‐complexity. The null‐finding for amyloid was expected, since, while the presence of amyloid increases risk for cognitive decline, it is the occurrence of tau that leads to cognitive decline and neurodegeneration. Overall, genetic risk potentially increases the prevalence of amyloid in this cohort and consequentially leads to a cumulative and more pronounced decrease in rs‐fMRI complexity in the presence of tau.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.087143
Primary Topic
Brain Tumor Detection and Classification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of diagnostic and genetic status on the relationship between rs‐fMRI complexity and tau & amyloid PET in Alzheimer’s disease

Dilmini Wijesinghe, Steven Cen, Kay Jann, Danny J.J. Wang et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Brain Tumor Detection and Classification
article

Effect of diagnostic and genetic status on the relationship between rs‐fMRI complexity and tau & amyloid PET in Alzheimer’s disease

Dilmini Wijesinghe, Steven Cen, Kay Jann, Danny J.J. Wang, John M. Ringman, Ru Zhang, M. Danda Vasconcelos Santos
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Non‐linear statistical analyses on resting‐state fMRI (rs‐fMRI) using complexity measures have demonstrated progressive decline in complexity from cognitively normal subjects (CN) to patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) and patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD). While complexity has been shown to be negatively associated with tau‐PET, the association with amyloid or effects of genetic characteristics (APOE4) remains unknown. Method From the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI3) we identified participants with tabulated SUVR values for amyloid and tau as well as one resting state fMRI scan for the same visit. The rs‐fMRI complexity was calculated as Multiscale Sample Entropy (MSE) (r=0.5, m=2, scale=6). SUVR values from precuneus, parahippocampal, inferior temporal and entorhinal regions were used in a multivariate generalized linear model to investigate the adjusted independent effects to corresponding rs‐fMRI complexity. Whether such effects were modified by either diagnosis (CN, MCI, AD) or APOE4 status (# alleles) were tested using the interaction terms in the multivariate model. Age and gender were controlled for all models. Result The final cohort consisted of 127 subjects (Table 1). We observed statistically significant negative associations between complexity and tau in parahippocampus, inferior temporal gyrus and precuneus (Table 2A). Diagnostic status does not modify these associations, however, APOE4 status showed a statistically significant interaction effect for tau and complexity in precuneus (Table 2C). For amyloid no associations nor interaction effects were found (Table 2B). Conclusion Our study confirmed previously reported statistically significant inverse relationship between rs‐fMRI complexity and tau‐PET, which is indicative of disfunction of neuronal signaling in the presence of tauopathy. While diagnostic classification showed no effects, the APOE4 genetic risk had a strong modifying effect leading to a stronger negative relationship between tau‐PET and fMRI‐complexity. The null‐finding for amyloid was expected, since, while the presence of amyloid increases risk for cognitive decline, it is the occurrence of tau that leads to cognitive decline and neurodegeneration. Overall, genetic risk potentially increases the prevalence of amyloid in this cohort and consequentially leads to a cumulative and more pronounced decrease in rs‐fMRI complexity in the presence of tau.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S2)
University of Southern California (US), University Memory and Aging Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Brain Tumor Detection and Classification
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.