Estimating the time between Aβ positivity and elevated regional tau in preclinical AD

Abstract Background Understanding when Aβ positive cognitively normal individuals develop tau pathology has important implications for treatment with anti‐Aβ therapies. We employed a changepoint regression approach to estimate time from Aβ‐PET positivity to regionally elevated tau‐PET in a population‐based cohort of primarily cognitively unimpaired individuals. Method Participants from Insight 46 (1946 British birth cohort) underwent two [ 18 F]florbetapir Aβ‐PET scans and a sub‐sample enriched for Aβ were also scanned with [ 18 F]MK‐6240 tau‐PET, characteristics are presented in Table 1. Age at Aβ‐PET positivity, defined through Gaussian mixture modelling (GMM) as >12 Centiloids, was estimated using the SILA algorithm (Betthauser et al. 2022). Tau‐PET SUVRs from a temporal‐meta, Braak I‐VI and 34 bilateral FreeSurfer7 regions were calculated 90‐110 mins post‐injection using an inferior cerebellar grey matter reference region. Tau‐PET positivity cutpoints for each region were defined using the 99 th percentile of the lower distribution from GMM. For each region, we tested changepoints in the slope of the linear regression between tau‐PET SUVR and time from estimated Aβ positivity with Bonferroni correction (5% significance, p<.001). Result At tau‐PET scan, 90 individuals (60%) were >0 years from estimated Aβ positivity. There was a statistically significant difference in slopes before and after the changepoint for all composite regions excluding Braak VI (Figure 1). Changepoint estimates show that tau accumulation started ∼2.5yrs after estimated Aβ positivity in Braak stages I‐III; and ∼10‐12.5yrs for Braak stages IV‐V, and the temporal‐meta region (Figure 2A). Regional estimates broadly followed Braak stages for 16/36 regions showing significant evidence of change in slopes (Figure 2B). Tau positivity rates before changepoints did not exceed 5%, whereas post‐changepoint tau positivity rates were between ∼10% and ∼50%. Regions with later changepoints tended to exhibit higher post‐changepoint slopes with greater uncertainty. Conclusion Elevated tau‐PET signal occurs ∼2.5 years after estimated age of Aβ onset in Braak stages I‐III and ∼10‐12.5 years in temporal‐meta and Braak stages IV‐V, with uncertainty within these groupings. These estimates for later Braak stages are consistent with results from previous work on the timing of positive tau PET visual reads. These findings may have implications for determining the optimal time to administer Aβ immunotherapies in asymptomatic individuals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.092286
Primary Topic
S100 Proteins and Annexins
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Estimating the time between Aβ positivity and elevated regional tau in preclinical AD

Tobey J. Betthauser, Nick C. Fox, Paweł Markiewicz, Kerstin Sander et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
S100 Proteins and Annexins
article

Estimating the time between Aβ positivity and elevated regional tau in preclinical AD

Tobey J. Betthauser, Nick C. Fox, Paweł Markiewicz, Kerstin Sander, David M. Cash, Jonathan M. Schott, Marcus Richards, Ramla Awais, William Coath, Catherine J Scott, Frederik Barkhof, Michael Schöll, David L. Thomas, Erik Årstad, John Dickson, Jordan P Teague
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Understanding when Aβ positive cognitively normal individuals develop tau pathology has important implications for treatment with anti‐Aβ therapies. We employed a changepoint regression approach to estimate time from Aβ‐PET positivity to regionally elevated tau‐PET in a population‐based cohort of primarily cognitively unimpaired individuals. Method Participants from Insight 46 (1946 British birth cohort) underwent two [ 18 F]florbetapir Aβ‐PET scans and a sub‐sample enriched for Aβ were also scanned with [ 18 F]MK‐6240 tau‐PET, characteristics are presented in Table 1. Age at Aβ‐PET positivity, defined through Gaussian mixture modelling (GMM) as >12 Centiloids, was estimated using the SILA algorithm (Betthauser et al. 2022). Tau‐PET SUVRs from a temporal‐meta, Braak I‐VI and 34 bilateral FreeSurfer7 regions were calculated 90‐110 mins post‐injection using an inferior cerebellar grey matter reference region. Tau‐PET positivity cutpoints for each region were defined using the 99 th percentile of the lower distribution from GMM. For each region, we tested changepoints in the slope of the linear regression between tau‐PET SUVR and time from estimated Aβ positivity with Bonferroni correction (5% significance, p<.001). Result At tau‐PET scan, 90 individuals (60%) were >0 years from estimated Aβ positivity. There was a statistically significant difference in slopes before and after the changepoint for all composite regions excluding Braak VI (Figure 1). Changepoint estimates show that tau accumulation started ∼2.5yrs after estimated Aβ positivity in Braak stages I‐III; and ∼10‐12.5yrs for Braak stages IV‐V, and the temporal‐meta region (Figure 2A). Regional estimates broadly followed Braak stages for 16/36 regions showing significant evidence of change in slopes (Figure 2B). Tau positivity rates before changepoints did not exceed 5%, whereas post‐changepoint tau positivity rates were between ∼10% and ∼50%. Regions with later changepoints tended to exhibit higher post‐changepoint slopes with greater uncertainty. Conclusion Elevated tau‐PET signal occurs ∼2.5 years after estimated age of Aβ onset in Braak stages I‐III and ∼10‐12.5 years in temporal‐meta and Braak stages IV‐V, with uncertainty within these groupings. These estimates for later Braak stages are consistent with results from previous work on the timing of positive tau PET visual reads. These findings may have implications for determining the optimal time to administer Aβ immunotherapies in asymptomatic individuals.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S2)
University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging (GB), Amsterdam Neuroscience (NL), UK Dementia Research Institute (GB), MRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing (GB), National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery (GB), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), University College London (GB), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL), University of Gothenburg (SE), Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
S100 Proteins and Annexins
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.