Implementation of Blood‐based Biomarkers in a Large Dementia Care Clinic: Case‐based Report from the UCSF Memory and Aging Center

Abstract Several new blood‐based biomarkers (BBMs) of Alzheimer’s disease and related neuropathologies have completed late‐stage validation and are beginning to be used in the clinical setting. However, the role of BBMs in various clinical settings, especially their specific context‐of‐use, remains an open question for the field. Several studies are beginning to systematically collect information on BBM real‐word diagnostic performance, but as BBMs transition from research settings to clinical implementation, experience from clinical providers in specialty centers can inform and guide use. In this session, BBM implementation at a large specialty care center, the University of California San Francisco (UCSF) Memory and Aging Center (MAC), will be discussed. The UCSF MAC is a division of the Department of Neurology dedicated to the diagnosis and care of patients with cognitive problems and their families, and the MAC has 32 clinicians who collectively evaluate over one thousand new patients a year with cognitive concerns. Additionally, the MAC recently launched an Alzheimer’s Infusion Core, dedicated to evaluating patients for the newly approved disease‐modifying treatments (DMT). Within the context of the UCSF MAC, integration of BBMs into clinical care will be reviewed using a case‐based format, including a description of overall provider usage, impact on differential diagnosis and subsequent management, and perceived role in the work‐up for patients interested in DMTs. Additional discussion will touch upon logistics and challenges to implementation, with a road map for future clinical integration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.090790
Primary Topic
Pharmacy and Medical Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Implementation of Blood‐based Biomarkers in a Large Dementia Care Clinic: Case‐based Report from the UCSF Memory and Aging Center

Lawren VandeVrede, Adam M. Staffaroni, Angele Breithaupt, Renaud La Joie et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Pharmacy and Medical Practices
article

Implementation of Blood‐based Biomarkers in a Large Dementia Care Clinic: Case‐based Report from the UCSF Memory and Aging Center

Lawren VandeVrede, Adam M. Staffaroni, Angele Breithaupt, Renaud La Joie, Adam L. Boxer, Peter Alexander Ljubenkov, Nhat Bui, Melanie L. Stephens, Bruce L. Miller, Elena Tsoy, Gil D. Rabinovici, David N. Soleimani‐Meigooni, Charles Windon, Julio C. Rojas, Katherine L. Possin, Y. González González, Tara Ellingson
article en

Abstract

Abstract Several new blood‐based biomarkers (BBMs) of Alzheimer’s disease and related neuropathologies have completed late‐stage validation and are beginning to be used in the clinical setting. However, the role of BBMs in various clinical settings, especially their specific context‐of‐use, remains an open question for the field. Several studies are beginning to systematically collect information on BBM real‐word diagnostic performance, but as BBMs transition from research settings to clinical implementation, experience from clinical providers in specialty centers can inform and guide use. In this session, BBM implementation at a large specialty care center, the University of California San Francisco (UCSF) Memory and Aging Center (MAC), will be discussed. The UCSF MAC is a division of the Department of Neurology dedicated to the diagnosis and care of patients with cognitive problems and their families, and the MAC has 32 clinicians who collectively evaluate over one thousand new patients a year with cognitive concerns. Additionally, the MAC recently launched an Alzheimer’s Infusion Core, dedicated to evaluating patients for the newly approved disease‐modifying treatments (DMT). Within the context of the UCSF MAC, integration of BBMs into clinical care will be reviewed using a case‐based format, including a description of overall provider usage, impact on differential diagnosis and subsequent management, and perceived role in the work‐up for patients interested in DMTs. Additional discussion will touch upon logistics and challenges to implementation, with a road map for future clinical integration.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S2)
University of California, San Francisco (US), University Memory and Aging Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Pharmacy and Medical Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.