Research Lumbar Puncture Recruitment, Safety and SOPs in Black/African American and white middle‐age participants

Abstract Background The Wharton Lab has collected CSF for over 10 years as a primary endpoint in NIH/NIA funded longitudinal observational studies and clinical trials in cognitively normal individuals with a parental history of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). LPs provide vital data on AD risk and progression and time specific information on efficacy for clinical interventions, yet few investigators include research LPs, for fear of clinical implications, lack of specialized clinicians, and perceived unwillingness of participants to consent to LPs, particularly in minoritized participants Method Comprehensive data is collected on willingness to take part in LP, safety, and procedure specifics, including side effects. Twenty milliliters of CSF are obtained using fluid drip or aspiration methods. Twenty‐four hours post LP, the study team contacts the participant for LP follow up using a standardized questionnaire (potential side effects, severity, and home care initiated). Daily follow‐up with the participant occurs until side effects subside Result Our data in 122 participants enrolled (1R01AG066203‐02) indicate that 1) show that research LPs are safe and well tolerated and 2) cognitively normal, middle‐aged participants are willing to undergo multiple LPs, regardless of race, ethnicity, and gender. Participants were 51.1% Black or African American and 45.2% Non‐Hispanic White, 76.3% female and have an average BMI of 27.8. 9.6% of individuals self‐excluded because of LP requirement. Of 139 LPs preformed, 93.9% of LPs were successful. 13.1% of participants reported a headache 24‐hours post LP. 78.8% of participants reported no side effects. Headache(n=10) and lower back pain(n=4) were the most common side effects. When side effects occurred post LP, 16.3% initiated home care suggested by the research team, with hydration being the most common(n=6). LPs were most successful with a 22 Whitacre needle, followed by a 22 Quincke needle Conclusion Data show that research LPs are safe and well tolerated in diverse cohorts, and that individuals are willing to take part in research LPs. Regular LP discussion and education for potential subjects is encouraged. Increased education and discussion of research LPs with the research team provides opportunities to discuss the procedure with the potential participant during the recruitment, consent, and screening processes

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.090789
Primary Topic
Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Research Lumbar Puncture Recruitment, Safety and SOPs in Black/African American and white middle‐age participants

Whitney Wharton, Danielle D. Verble, Brittany Butts, William T. Hu et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
article

Research Lumbar Puncture Recruitment, Safety and SOPs in Black/African American and white middle‐age participants

Whitney Wharton, Danielle D. Verble, Brittany Butts, William T. Hu, Lynn Marie Trotti, Kelly D. S. Likos, Karima Benameur, Laura Scorr
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background The Wharton Lab has collected CSF for over 10 years as a primary endpoint in NIH/NIA funded longitudinal observational studies and clinical trials in cognitively normal individuals with a parental history of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). LPs provide vital data on AD risk and progression and time specific information on efficacy for clinical interventions, yet few investigators include research LPs, for fear of clinical implications, lack of specialized clinicians, and perceived unwillingness of participants to consent to LPs, particularly in minoritized participants Method Comprehensive data is collected on willingness to take part in LP, safety, and procedure specifics, including side effects. Twenty milliliters of CSF are obtained using fluid drip or aspiration methods. Twenty‐four hours post LP, the study team contacts the participant for LP follow up using a standardized questionnaire (potential side effects, severity, and home care initiated). Daily follow‐up with the participant occurs until side effects subside Result Our data in 122 participants enrolled (1R01AG066203‐02) indicate that 1) show that research LPs are safe and well tolerated and 2) cognitively normal, middle‐aged participants are willing to undergo multiple LPs, regardless of race, ethnicity, and gender. Participants were 51.1% Black or African American and 45.2% Non‐Hispanic White, 76.3% female and have an average BMI of 27.8. 9.6% of individuals self‐excluded because of LP requirement. Of 139 LPs preformed, 93.9% of LPs were successful. 13.1% of participants reported a headache 24‐hours post LP. 78.8% of participants reported no side effects. Headache(n=10) and lower back pain(n=4) were the most common side effects. When side effects occurred post LP, 16.3% initiated home care suggested by the research team, with hydration being the most common(n=6). LPs were most successful with a 22 Whitacre needle, followed by a 22 Quincke needle Conclusion Data show that research LPs are safe and well tolerated in diverse cohorts, and that individuals are willing to take part in research LPs. Regular LP discussion and education for potential subjects is encouraged. Increased education and discussion of research LPs with the research team provides opportunities to discuss the procedure with the potential participant during the recruitment, consent, and screening processes

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S2)
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US), Emory University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.