Drawing the neurodegenerative line: plasma biomarkers and retinal OCTs shed light on pathophysiological and diagnostic similarities between Alzheimer's Disease and Multiple Sclerosis

Abstract Background Recent evidence suggests extensive myelin dysfunction in Alzheimer’s Disease (AD), lending to investigation of biomarkers previously implicated in both AD and Multiple Sclerosis (MS) to find objective and obtainable diagnostic screening tools. Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), Chitinase‐3‐like protein 1 (CHI3L1), Chemokine (C‐X‐C motif) ligand 13 (CXCL13), and neurofilament light chain (Nfl) have been known to mark neuronal pathology in both diseases making them attractive markers. Retinal Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) becomes a popular diagnostic tool in both conditions as an inexpensive and rapid way of obtaining a window into the cerebrum. Method AD (n=3952) and MS (n=1988) patients were selected from the UK‐Biobank using ICD10 codes. Past medical history of strokes and brain cancer were used as exclusionary criteria. Case‐control differences were analyzed in cognitive measures, retinal OCT, plasma proteins, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data. AD subjects were further stratified. Correlation and predictability of plasma markers and retinal OCTs with cognitive and MRI measures were investigated with linear regression models, age‐ and sex‐controlled. Result Stable AD, MS, and AD converters showed significantly worse cognitive performances compared to controls. GFAP and Nfl were significantly elevated in MS (additionally, CHI3L1), AD patients, and AD converters as early as 5 to 10 years before diagnosis. Retinal OCT markers such as retinal nerve fiber thickness (RNFT) were significantly decreased in MS patients, while less clear patterns were observed for AD and converters. MRI measures obtained 10 years after baseline visit revealed significantly smaller hippocampal volumes and more white matter hyperintensities in both AD and MS patients compared to controls. Overall, retinal OCT measures (i.e., thinner RNFT, smaller optic disc diameter) significantly correlated with worse cognitive outcomes and elevated protein markers for both groups. While certain measures of cognitive decline (e.g., mean reaction time, numeric memory) better correlated with well‐established MRI hallmarks for neurodegeneration. Conclusion Inexpensive and non‐invasive biomarkers such as plasma proteins and retinal OCT measures carry significant prognostic potential in AD and MS while allowing for a deeper characterization of the neuronal and glial pathology in both diseases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.088222
Primary Topic
Retinal Imaging and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Drawing the neurodegenerative line: plasma biomarkers and retinal OCTs shed light on pathophysiological and diagnostic similarities between Alzheimer's Disease and Multiple Sclerosis

Bang‐Bon Koo, Yi Guan, Chia Hsin Cheng, Dean Zeldich
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Retinal Imaging and Analysis
article

Drawing the neurodegenerative line: plasma biomarkers and retinal OCTs shed light on pathophysiological and diagnostic similarities between Alzheimer's Disease and Multiple Sclerosis

Bang‐Bon Koo, Yi Guan, Chia Hsin Cheng, Dean Zeldich
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Recent evidence suggests extensive myelin dysfunction in Alzheimer’s Disease (AD), lending to investigation of biomarkers previously implicated in both AD and Multiple Sclerosis (MS) to find objective and obtainable diagnostic screening tools. Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), Chitinase‐3‐like protein 1 (CHI3L1), Chemokine (C‐X‐C motif) ligand 13 (CXCL13), and neurofilament light chain (Nfl) have been known to mark neuronal pathology in both diseases making them attractive markers. Retinal Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) becomes a popular diagnostic tool in both conditions as an inexpensive and rapid way of obtaining a window into the cerebrum. Method AD (n=3952) and MS (n=1988) patients were selected from the UK‐Biobank using ICD10 codes. Past medical history of strokes and brain cancer were used as exclusionary criteria. Case‐control differences were analyzed in cognitive measures, retinal OCT, plasma proteins, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data. AD subjects were further stratified. Correlation and predictability of plasma markers and retinal OCTs with cognitive and MRI measures were investigated with linear regression models, age‐ and sex‐controlled. Result Stable AD, MS, and AD converters showed significantly worse cognitive performances compared to controls. GFAP and Nfl were significantly elevated in MS (additionally, CHI3L1), AD patients, and AD converters as early as 5 to 10 years before diagnosis. Retinal OCT markers such as retinal nerve fiber thickness (RNFT) were significantly decreased in MS patients, while less clear patterns were observed for AD and converters. MRI measures obtained 10 years after baseline visit revealed significantly smaller hippocampal volumes and more white matter hyperintensities in both AD and MS patients compared to controls. Overall, retinal OCT measures (i.e., thinner RNFT, smaller optic disc diameter) significantly correlated with worse cognitive outcomes and elevated protein markers for both groups. While certain measures of cognitive decline (e.g., mean reaction time, numeric memory) better correlated with well‐established MRI hallmarks for neurodegeneration. Conclusion Inexpensive and non‐invasive biomarkers such as plasma proteins and retinal OCT measures carry significant prognostic potential in AD and MS while allowing for a deeper characterization of the neuronal and glial pathology in both diseases.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S2)
Boston University (US), Thomas Jefferson University Hospital (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Retinal Imaging and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.