Unsupervised online reaction time test improves estimation of cognitive function in a large sample of cognitively‐asymptomatic older adults

Abstract Background Finding low‐cost, accessible methods to detect people at risk of preclinical Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a research priority for neuroprotective drug development and clinical trials. Sub‐clinical asymptomatic decline in episodic memory is a proxy measure of preclinical AD and there is emerging evidence that analysis of motor patterns using laboratory apparatus may detect this stage. There has been little investigation of whether self‐administrated simple hand motor tests using personal computers in an unsupervised environment can detect preclinical AD. This study evaluated how home‐based reaction time tests predict cognitive performance in a sample of cognitively asymptomatic older adults. Method 894 community participants (66.2 +/‐ 7.46 years old, 71.0 % female) who self‐reported an absence of cognitive symptoms were recruited from the ISLAND cohort study. In an unsupervised environment such as their home, they completed a simple reaction time test and a five‐choice reaction time test from the TAS Test website, and validated online cognitive tests (CANTAB) of episodic memory, working memory and executive function. Reaction time was measured in milliseconds. Test failure was defined as a delay of > 2000 milliseconds. We fitted hurdle linear mixed models to examine associations between reaction time, and test failure, with cognitive performance, adjusted for choice (simple or 5‐choice). Result Higher episodic and working memory errors, and worse executive function scores were associated with test failure (episodic memory log‐odds = 0.135, p < 0.001, working memory log‐odds = 0.130, p = 0.002, and executive function log‐odds= 0.132, p < 0.001). There was no significant association between cognitive test scores and reaction time on successful trials (episodic memory p = 0.438, working memory and executive function models would not converge). Conclusion Test failure in brief self‐administered online reaction time tests were associated with cognitive test performance across three domains, in a cognitively asymptomatic older cohort. This provides a potential low‐cost and brief home‐based method for risk stratification of enriched cohorts for further assessment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.091033
Primary Topic
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unsupervised online reaction time test improves estimation of cognitive function in a large sample of cognitively‐asymptomatic older adults

Son N. Tran, Katherine Lawler, James Clement Vickers, Quan Bai et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
article

Unsupervised online reaction time test improves estimation of cognitive function in a large sample of cognitively‐asymptomatic older adults

Son N. Tran, Katherine Lawler, James Clement Vickers, Quan Bai, Alastair John Noyce, Xinyi Wang, Jane Alty, Rebecca J. St George, Larissa Bartlett, Anna Elizabeth King, Aidan David Bindoff, Eddy Roccati
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Finding low‐cost, accessible methods to detect people at risk of preclinical Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a research priority for neuroprotective drug development and clinical trials. Sub‐clinical asymptomatic decline in episodic memory is a proxy measure of preclinical AD and there is emerging evidence that analysis of motor patterns using laboratory apparatus may detect this stage. There has been little investigation of whether self‐administrated simple hand motor tests using personal computers in an unsupervised environment can detect preclinical AD. This study evaluated how home‐based reaction time tests predict cognitive performance in a sample of cognitively asymptomatic older adults. Method 894 community participants (66.2 +/‐ 7.46 years old, 71.0 % female) who self‐reported an absence of cognitive symptoms were recruited from the ISLAND cohort study. In an unsupervised environment such as their home, they completed a simple reaction time test and a five‐choice reaction time test from the TAS Test website, and validated online cognitive tests (CANTAB) of episodic memory, working memory and executive function. Reaction time was measured in milliseconds. Test failure was defined as a delay of > 2000 milliseconds. We fitted hurdle linear mixed models to examine associations between reaction time, and test failure, with cognitive performance, adjusted for choice (simple or 5‐choice). Result Higher episodic and working memory errors, and worse executive function scores were associated with test failure (episodic memory log‐odds = 0.135, p < 0.001, working memory log‐odds = 0.130, p = 0.002, and executive function log‐odds= 0.132, p < 0.001). There was no significant association between cognitive test scores and reaction time on successful trials (episodic memory p = 0.438, working memory and executive function models would not converge). Conclusion Test failure in brief self‐administered online reaction time tests were associated with cognitive test performance across three domains, in a cognitively asymptomatic older cohort. This provides a potential low‐cost and brief home‐based method for risk stratification of enriched cohorts for further assessment.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S2)
University of Tasmania (AU), Queen Mary University of London (GB), La Trobe University (AU), Royal Hobart Hospital (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.