Multi‐atlas fully automated segmentation of the locus coeruleus in in vivo neuromelanin‐sensitive MRI

Abstract Background Locus coeruleus (LC) imaging using neuromelanin‐sensitive (NM) MRI sequences is a promising biomarker for detecting early Alzheimer’s Disease (AD). Although automatic approaches have been developed to estimate LC integrity by measuring its intensity, these techniques most often rely on a single template built in a standardized space and/or depend on a number of voxels to be accounted that is defined a priori. Thus, these algorithms make it impossible to perform direct volumetric analyses and do not properly account for inter‐individual anatomical variability. To fill this gap, our aim was to develop a new multi‐atlas fully automated segmentation method using the Automatic Segmentation of Hippocampal Subfields (ASHS) software. Method We used baseline data from 102 unimpaired older adults (mean age: 73.72 ± 3.5 years; mean education: 13.25 ± 3.1 years; 58 women, 44 men) from the Age‐Well randomized controlled trial for whom high‐resolution NM MRI (T1‐w with magnetization transfer; 0.3x0.3x0.75mm 3 ) and standard T1‐w MRI (1x1x1mm 3 ) were available. The LC were manually segmented in 30 randomly selected participants on NM MRI, and the standard T1‐w MRI, NM MRI and bilateral segmentations were fed into the ASHS training pipeline to generate an atlas. This new atlas was applied to the 72 remaining subjects to segment the LC and we assessed the effects of age, sex and education on both i) LC intensity (normalized by the intensity of the pons) and ii) LC volume (normalized by the total intracranial volume). Result Five‐fold cross‐validation experiments revealed high accuracy of the automatic segmentation relative to manual segmentation (Dice coefficient = 0,83 ± 0,04). LC intensity was significantly higher in women than in men (F=13.61, p<0.001) while no associations with age (β=‐0.0002, p=0.86) or education (β=0.002, p=0.16) were found. In contrast, LC volume was not different between men and women (F=0.21, p=0.65) but tended to be negatively associated with age (β=‐0.15, p=0.06) and education (β=‐0.19, p=0.06). Conclusion Overall, this new method allows to automatically and accurately segment the LC, and offers the opportunity to measure its integrity both in terms of intensity and volume. This is of importance since these two metrics might provide complementary information about the integrity of the LC.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.088688
Primary Topic
Gene expression and cancer classification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multi‐atlas fully automated segmentation of the locus coeruleus in in vivo neuromelanin‐sensitive MRI

Gaël Chételat, Robin de Florès, Nicolas Delcroix, Paul A. Yushkevich et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Gene expression and cancer classification
article

Multi‐atlas fully automated segmentation of the locus coeruleus in in vivo neuromelanin‐sensitive MRI

Gaël Chételat, Robin de Florès, Nicolas Delcroix, Paul A. Yushkevich, Brigitte Landeau, Mikaël Naveau, Thaïs Blanchard, Emilie Foyard
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Locus coeruleus (LC) imaging using neuromelanin‐sensitive (NM) MRI sequences is a promising biomarker for detecting early Alzheimer’s Disease (AD). Although automatic approaches have been developed to estimate LC integrity by measuring its intensity, these techniques most often rely on a single template built in a standardized space and/or depend on a number of voxels to be accounted that is defined a priori. Thus, these algorithms make it impossible to perform direct volumetric analyses and do not properly account for inter‐individual anatomical variability. To fill this gap, our aim was to develop a new multi‐atlas fully automated segmentation method using the Automatic Segmentation of Hippocampal Subfields (ASHS) software. Method We used baseline data from 102 unimpaired older adults (mean age: 73.72 ± 3.5 years; mean education: 13.25 ± 3.1 years; 58 women, 44 men) from the Age‐Well randomized controlled trial for whom high‐resolution NM MRI (T1‐w with magnetization transfer; 0.3x0.3x0.75mm 3 ) and standard T1‐w MRI (1x1x1mm 3 ) were available. The LC were manually segmented in 30 randomly selected participants on NM MRI, and the standard T1‐w MRI, NM MRI and bilateral segmentations were fed into the ASHS training pipeline to generate an atlas. This new atlas was applied to the 72 remaining subjects to segment the LC and we assessed the effects of age, sex and education on both i) LC intensity (normalized by the intensity of the pons) and ii) LC volume (normalized by the total intracranial volume). Result Five‐fold cross‐validation experiments revealed high accuracy of the automatic segmentation relative to manual segmentation (Dice coefficient = 0,83 ± 0,04). LC intensity was significantly higher in women than in men (F=13.61, p<0.001) while no associations with age (β=‐0.0002, p=0.86) or education (β=0.002, p=0.16) were found. In contrast, LC volume was not different between men and women (F=0.21, p=0.65) but tended to be negatively associated with age (β=‐0.15, p=0.06) and education (β=‐0.19, p=0.06). Conclusion Overall, this new method allows to automatically and accurately segment the LC, and offers the opportunity to measure its integrity both in terms of intensity and volume. This is of importance since these two metrics might provide complementary information about the integrity of the LC.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S2)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Inserm (FR), Normandie Université (FR), Cyceron (FR), Physiopathologie et imagerie des troubles neurologiques, University of Pennsylvania (US), Université de Caen Normandie (FR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Gene expression and cancer classification
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.