Multi‐modal AI screening for MCI and Alzheimer's Disease: results from an Argentine Cohort

Abstract Background Early detection of Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) is crucial for effective prevention. Traditional methods like expert judgment, clinical evaluations, and manual linguistic analyses are now complemented by Artificial Intelligence (AI). AI offers new avenues for identifying linguistic, facial, and acoustic markers of MCI. The exploration of these markers for MCI research is just beginning, especially in regions like Argentina. The effectiveness of AI‐methodologies hinges on local data calibration and validation prior to deployment. This study focuses on designing AI‐based neuropsychological instruments to differentiate healthy individuals from MCI subjects, emphasizing local data calibration and validation. Method We recruited 42 participants (30/12 healthy/MCI according to Petersen's criteria, 2016) aged 60 to 89 (mean ± SD: 70.95 ± 6.8) in Fleni, Argentina. During the assessment, which included neuropsychological tests (UDS‐3), participants were video and audio recorded while performing a language task on a web platform. They were required to describe two target images ('Cookie Theft' and 'Firefighter‐Oasis.') and two tasks without any target image (description of their favorite sandwich and reading a story). Markers were extracted from 5 modalities: Speech (automated speech transcription), Acoustics (audio), Face mesh (video), Blend shapes (video) and Emotion recognition (video and audio). Result Unimodal analysis was performed to study shared information between proposed AI‐markers and traditional neurocognitive tests. Speech markers were correlated with language and memory, and overall, we obtained a total of 204 significantly correlated AI‐markers to traditional tests of a total of 432 (47%). Univariate AUC for MCI diagnosis was measured for all markers obtaining an average above chance performance of (0.57 ± 0.062). Finally, a multivariate random forest classifier was used to extract the performance of the modalities altogether, an AUC of 0.91 Conclusion The results of this preliminary study show the validity of the AI algorithms applied to the local argentine population. Validation of algorithms using data in Spanish language and with Latin American population is a key element for de dissemination and the diversification of AI tools. The next step of this research is to include more patients with MCI to gain a comprehensive understanding of differential communicational patterns.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.087333
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.12
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multi‐modal AI screening for MCI and Alzheimer's Disease: results from an Argentine Cohort

Lara Gauder, Nicolás Corvalán, Lucía Crivelli, Diego Fernández Slezak et al.
3 citations
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
2.12
article

Multi‐modal AI screening for MCI and Alzheimer's Disease: results from an Argentine Cohort

Lara Gauder, Nicolás Corvalán, Lucía Crivelli, Diego Fernández Slezak, Greta Keller, Agostina Carello, Gustavo Juantorena, Ricardo Allegri, Laouen Belloli
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background Early detection of Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) is crucial for effective prevention. Traditional methods like expert judgment, clinical evaluations, and manual linguistic analyses are now complemented by Artificial Intelligence (AI). AI offers new avenues for identifying linguistic, facial, and acoustic markers of MCI. The exploration of these markers for MCI research is just beginning, especially in regions like Argentina. The effectiveness of AI‐methodologies hinges on local data calibration and validation prior to deployment. This study focuses on designing AI‐based neuropsychological instruments to differentiate healthy individuals from MCI subjects, emphasizing local data calibration and validation. Method We recruited 42 participants (30/12 healthy/MCI according to Petersen's criteria, 2016) aged 60 to 89 (mean ± SD: 70.95 ± 6.8) in Fleni, Argentina. During the assessment, which included neuropsychological tests (UDS‐3), participants were video and audio recorded while performing a language task on a web platform. They were required to describe two target images ('Cookie Theft' and 'Firefighter‐Oasis.') and two tasks without any target image (description of their favorite sandwich and reading a story). Markers were extracted from 5 modalities: Speech (automated speech transcription), Acoustics (audio), Face mesh (video), Blend shapes (video) and Emotion recognition (video and audio). Result Unimodal analysis was performed to study shared information between proposed AI‐markers and traditional neurocognitive tests. Speech markers were correlated with language and memory, and overall, we obtained a total of 204 significantly correlated AI‐markers to traditional tests of a total of 432 (47%). Univariate AUC for MCI diagnosis was measured for all markers obtaining an average above chance performance of (0.57 ± 0.062). Finally, a multivariate random forest classifier was used to extract the performance of the modalities altogether, an AUC of 0.91 Conclusion The results of this preliminary study show the validity of the AI algorithms applied to the local argentine population. Validation of algorithms using data in Spanish language and with Latin American population is a key element for de dissemination and the diversification of AI tools. The next step of this research is to include more patients with MCI to gain a comprehensive understanding of differential communicational patterns.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S2)
Universidad de Buenos Aires (AR), Fundación para la Lucha contra las Enfermedades Neurológicas de la Infancia (AR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
2.12
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.