Deciphering Alzheimer's Disease Complexity: Integrative Analysis of CSF Proteomic and Lipidomic Data through Dimensionality Reduction

Abstract Background Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) is a complex disorder and much of its etiopathology is still unknown. Here, we applied dimensionality reduction methods to disentangle cyptic patterns in CSF proteomic and lipidomic data. Method We studied 1121 CSF samples using targeted lipidomics based on liquid chromatography (LC)‐MS/MS (mass spectrometry), generated by Lipometrix (Lueven, Belgium), and proteomic data generated by Somalogic (Boulder, Colorado) using the SOMAscan 7k Assay. We independently computed the principal components for the proteomic and lipidomic datasets using good quality lipids (N=388) and proteins (N=2469). CSF samples were obtained by lumbar punctures at ACE Alzheimer Center (Barcelona, Spain), including patients at different points of the dementia continuum (SCD, MCI and dementia). Principal components were calculated using the princomp() function in R. Result PC1 explained a substantial fraction of the variance in lipidomic (∼40%) and proteomic (∼60%) datasets and was highly correlated between both omics (R2=0.43; p=2.3·10 ‐138 , Figure 1). We explored the association profile of the PCs to AD risk factors (age, sex, APOE, PRS, diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, BMI), endophenotypes (abeta, tau), disease progression and total protein in the CSF. PC1, as well as the individual lipid species, were strongly associated with abeta, tau and total CSF protein levels (Figure 2). Finally, we conducted a GWAS of the first 20 lipidomic and proteomic PCs. PC1 displayed a GWS signal at chr3q28 in both omics. This region has been previously linked with CSF tau levels and brain morphology. Subsequent lipidomic PCs were associated with variants in the FADS1/FADS2 locus, while other proteomic PCs were associated with variants in the APOE locus (Figure 3). Conclusion Our findings revealed a shared major contributor to the variance in CSF between lipidomic and proteomic data, which is related to the tau, abeta and total protein signature, and identified a QTL associated to both the lipidomic and proteomic PC1. Accounting for this major variance contributor may enhance future studies involving CSF biomarkers. Subsequent principal components had specific association profiles to AD risk factors and endophenotypes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.088693
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deciphering Alzheimer's Disease Complexity: Integrative Analysis of CSF Proteomic and Lipidomic Data through Dimensionality Reduction

Jonas Dehairs, Agustı́n Ruiz, Johannes V. Swinnen, Laura Montrreal et al.
1 citations
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
0.23
article

Deciphering Alzheimer's Disease Complexity: Integrative Analysis of CSF Proteomic and Lipidomic Data through Dimensionality Reduction

Jonas Dehairs, Agustı́n Ruiz, Johannes V. Swinnen, Laura Montrreal, Itziar de Rojas, Victoria Fernández, Adelina Orellana, Maitée Rosende‐Roca, Alfredo Cabrera Socorro, Merçé Boada, Asif Imran Emon, Vanesa Pytel, Raquel Puerta, Pablo García‐González, Bart Smets, Lluís Tárraga, Marta Marquié
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) is a complex disorder and much of its etiopathology is still unknown. Here, we applied dimensionality reduction methods to disentangle cyptic patterns in CSF proteomic and lipidomic data. Method We studied 1121 CSF samples using targeted lipidomics based on liquid chromatography (LC)‐MS/MS (mass spectrometry), generated by Lipometrix (Lueven, Belgium), and proteomic data generated by Somalogic (Boulder, Colorado) using the SOMAscan 7k Assay. We independently computed the principal components for the proteomic and lipidomic datasets using good quality lipids (N=388) and proteins (N=2469). CSF samples were obtained by lumbar punctures at ACE Alzheimer Center (Barcelona, Spain), including patients at different points of the dementia continuum (SCD, MCI and dementia). Principal components were calculated using the princomp() function in R. Result PC1 explained a substantial fraction of the variance in lipidomic (∼40%) and proteomic (∼60%) datasets and was highly correlated between both omics (R2=0.43; p=2.3·10 ‐138 , Figure 1). We explored the association profile of the PCs to AD risk factors (age, sex, APOE, PRS, diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, BMI), endophenotypes (abeta, tau), disease progression and total protein in the CSF. PC1, as well as the individual lipid species, were strongly associated with abeta, tau and total CSF protein levels (Figure 2). Finally, we conducted a GWAS of the first 20 lipidomic and proteomic PCs. PC1 displayed a GWS signal at chr3q28 in both omics. This region has been previously linked with CSF tau levels and brain morphology. Subsequent lipidomic PCs were associated with variants in the FADS1/FADS2 locus, while other proteomic PCs were associated with variants in the APOE locus (Figure 3). Conclusion Our findings revealed a shared major contributor to the variance in CSF between lipidomic and proteomic data, which is related to the tau, abeta and total protein signature, and identified a QTL associated to both the lipidomic and proteomic PC1. Accounting for this major variance contributor may enhance future studies involving CSF biomarkers. Subsequent principal components had specific association profiles to AD risk factors and endophenotypes.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S2)
Janssen (Belgium) (BE), The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US), Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ES), Universitat Internacional de Catalunya (ES), Biomedical Research Networking Center on Neurodegenerative Diseases (ES), VIB-KU Leuven Center for Cancer Biology (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
0.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.