A‐T+ PET participants in preclinical AD: Clinical progression and concordance with fluid markers
Abstract Background Amyloid‐negative tau‐positive PET (A‐T+) participants have been reported in several studies. We assessed the prevalence and characteristics of A‐T+ participants in a cohort of cognitively unimpaired individuals with a first‐degree family history of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) dementia. Method We studied 252 participants from the longitudinal PREVENT‐AD cohort (mean cognitive follow‐up = 3.42 years, SD = 2.86) who received an amyloid ( 18 F‐NAV4694) and a tau ( 18 F‐Flortaucipir) PET‐scan. The amyloid‐positivity threshold was 18 centiloids (SUVR=1.27) and tau positive threshold was set as 2SD above the mean of A‐ participants in a temporal meta‐ROI (SUVR=1.29). Follow‐up PET scans were available for 109 participants. We characterized A‐T+ participants on clinical (age, sex, APOE4 status, education, depression, apathy, anxiety, sleep), cognitive (RBANS, MMSE, ECoG) and fluid (CSF, plasma) measurements. Result In the PREVENT‐AD cohort, only 3 (1.2 %) of all studied participants were classified as A‐T+ (see Table 1 for participants characteristics). Participants 1 and 2 were positive based on plasma Aβ 42/40 and they had relatively low levels of tau binding that could represent early pathology. Participant 3 was also positive based on CSF and plasma, her Aβ‐PET scan was classified as positive on visual read and became quantitatively positive at follow‐up. Participant 3 had extensive unilateral tau binding at baseline that became bilateral at follow‐up (Figure 1). Figure 2 details the longitudinal cognitive trajectory of Participant 3. During the cognitive follow‐up, participants 1 developed mild cognitive impairment and participant 3 developed dementia. Conclusion A‐T+ individuals are rare in the PREVENT‐AD cohort and the 3 A‐T+ were classified as Aβ positive based on fluid biomarkers. One of the 3 A‐T+ individuals showed a very fast clinical progression and a tau uptake pattern atypical of AD.
Authors
- Jennifer Tremblay‐Mercier (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5824-3740)
- Christine Déry
- Elisabeth Sylvain
- Alexa Pichet Binette (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5218-3337)
- Béry Mohammediyan
- Jordana Remz
- Frédéric St‐Onge (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5609-5729)
- Jean‐Paul Soucy (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6979-1259)
- Alfonso Fajardo
- Yara Yakoub (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4769-7162)
- Sylvia Villeneuve (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2338-0467)
- Julie Gonneaud (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0566-5581)
- Jacob W. Vogel (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6394-9940)
Institutions
- Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital (CA)
- Lund University (SE)
- Douglas Mental Health University Institute (CA)
- McGill University (CA)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Alzheimer s & Dementia
- Published
- 2024-12-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.092369
- Primary Topic
- Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00