A‐T+ PET participants in preclinical AD: Clinical progression and concordance with fluid markers

Abstract Background Amyloid‐negative tau‐positive PET (A‐T+) participants have been reported in several studies. We assessed the prevalence and characteristics of A‐T+ participants in a cohort of cognitively unimpaired individuals with a first‐degree family history of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) dementia. Method We studied 252 participants from the longitudinal PREVENT‐AD cohort (mean cognitive follow‐up = 3.42 years, SD = 2.86) who received an amyloid ( 18 F‐NAV4694) and a tau ( 18 F‐Flortaucipir) PET‐scan. The amyloid‐positivity threshold was 18 centiloids (SUVR=1.27) and tau positive threshold was set as 2SD above the mean of A‐ participants in a temporal meta‐ROI (SUVR=1.29). Follow‐up PET scans were available for 109 participants. We characterized A‐T+ participants on clinical (age, sex, APOE4 status, education, depression, apathy, anxiety, sleep), cognitive (RBANS, MMSE, ECoG) and fluid (CSF, plasma) measurements. Result In the PREVENT‐AD cohort, only 3 (1.2 %) of all studied participants were classified as A‐T+ (see Table 1 for participants characteristics). Participants 1 and 2 were positive based on plasma Aβ 42/40 and they had relatively low levels of tau binding that could represent early pathology. Participant 3 was also positive based on CSF and plasma, her Aβ‐PET scan was classified as positive on visual read and became quantitatively positive at follow‐up. Participant 3 had extensive unilateral tau binding at baseline that became bilateral at follow‐up (Figure 1). Figure 2 details the longitudinal cognitive trajectory of Participant 3. During the cognitive follow‐up, participants 1 developed mild cognitive impairment and participant 3 developed dementia. Conclusion A‐T+ individuals are rare in the PREVENT‐AD cohort and the 3 A‐T+ were classified as Aβ positive based on fluid biomarkers. One of the 3 A‐T+ individuals showed a very fast clinical progression and a tau uptake pattern atypical of AD.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.092369
Primary Topic
Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A‐T+ PET participants in preclinical AD: Clinical progression and concordance with fluid markers

Jennifer Tremblay‐Mercier, Christine Déry, Elisabeth Sylvain, Alexa Pichet Binette et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
article

A‐T+ PET participants in preclinical AD: Clinical progression and concordance with fluid markers

Jennifer Tremblay‐Mercier, Christine Déry, Elisabeth Sylvain, Alexa Pichet Binette, Béry Mohammediyan, Jordana Remz, Frédéric St‐Onge, Jean‐Paul Soucy, Alfonso Fajardo, Yara Yakoub, Sylvia Villeneuve, Julie Gonneaud, Jacob W. Vogel
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Amyloid‐negative tau‐positive PET (A‐T+) participants have been reported in several studies. We assessed the prevalence and characteristics of A‐T+ participants in a cohort of cognitively unimpaired individuals with a first‐degree family history of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) dementia. Method We studied 252 participants from the longitudinal PREVENT‐AD cohort (mean cognitive follow‐up = 3.42 years, SD = 2.86) who received an amyloid ( 18 F‐NAV4694) and a tau ( 18 F‐Flortaucipir) PET‐scan. The amyloid‐positivity threshold was 18 centiloids (SUVR=1.27) and tau positive threshold was set as 2SD above the mean of A‐ participants in a temporal meta‐ROI (SUVR=1.29). Follow‐up PET scans were available for 109 participants. We characterized A‐T+ participants on clinical (age, sex, APOE4 status, education, depression, apathy, anxiety, sleep), cognitive (RBANS, MMSE, ECoG) and fluid (CSF, plasma) measurements. Result In the PREVENT‐AD cohort, only 3 (1.2 %) of all studied participants were classified as A‐T+ (see Table 1 for participants characteristics). Participants 1 and 2 were positive based on plasma Aβ 42/40 and they had relatively low levels of tau binding that could represent early pathology. Participant 3 was also positive based on CSF and plasma, her Aβ‐PET scan was classified as positive on visual read and became quantitatively positive at follow‐up. Participant 3 had extensive unilateral tau binding at baseline that became bilateral at follow‐up (Figure 1). Figure 2 details the longitudinal cognitive trajectory of Participant 3. During the cognitive follow‐up, participants 1 developed mild cognitive impairment and participant 3 developed dementia. Conclusion A‐T+ individuals are rare in the PREVENT‐AD cohort and the 3 A‐T+ were classified as Aβ positive based on fluid biomarkers. One of the 3 A‐T+ individuals showed a very fast clinical progression and a tau uptake pattern atypical of AD.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S2)
Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital (CA), Lund University (SE), Douglas Mental Health University Institute (CA), McGill University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.