Investigating the ATN (Amyloid, Tau, Neurodegeneration) framework in Alzheimer’s Disease and its causal genetic‐drivers using Digital‐Twins

Abstract Background Amyloid, Tau and neurodegeneration (ATN), the hallmark pathologies of Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) translating to measurable biomarkers are important for disease modifying therapeutics. Method AD Digital‐Twins were built using AITIA’s patented A.I. platform REFS TM [aitiabio.com], based on a Bayesian network model of ADNI data which reverse‐engineered the connectivity of ∼59K multi‐modal variables and AD‐related outcomes profiled from 317 subjects (Control: MCI: Dementia=97:191:29). The average causal effect of each upstream‐downstream variables was estimated through in‐silico counterfactual experiments to evaluate the temporal relationship between the ATN outcomes, to identify the causal gene‐drivers (at blood RNA‐expression level) of “ATN” outcomes, and to investigate the known AD genotypic variants strongly driving ATN gene‐drivers. Age‐gene interaction was additionally explored through “double‐intervention” experiments, to evaluate age‐specific effects of gene‐drivers on ATN outcomes. Result AD Digital‐Twins evaluated the ATN temporal relationship, and recapitulated some known relationships such that CSF‐abeta and Tau measures drive neurodegeneration measures, although it also showed CSF‐Tau measures to be upstream of amyloid PET, suggesting Tau changes may interact with other outcome changes more dynamically over the course of disease progression (Figure 1). Next, in‐silico experiments identified a total of 228 ATN gene‐drivers, including 8 common to all outcome‐categories, which affect cognitive outcomes as well (Figure 2) and are strongly related to immune‐response and inflammation pathways. Many of these genes were causally driven by multiple AD‐associated genotypic variants reported in GWAS, especially in the “NECTIN2” and “APOE” region. Furthermore, in‐silico experiments showed some Tau‐driving genes are likely to be causally driven by Amyloid and Neurodegeneration driving genes. Lastly, age‐specific effects were observed for a portion of each A‐, T‐ and N‐ gene‐drivers, especially with Tau‐driving genes having a stronger effect with opposite directionality for younger vs older age groups (Figure 3). Conclusion Tau related abnormalities are likely early events in AD progression and more strongly linked to disease pathophysiology. Aitia’s AI platform allows powerful and systematic evaluation of multiple modalities and outcomes, accelerating precision medicine efforts in AD.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.091647
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.33
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigating the ATN (Amyloid, Tau, Neurodegeneration) framework in Alzheimer’s Disease and its causal genetic‐drivers using Digital‐Twins

Jeanne C. Latourelle, Ole Isacson, Apoorva Bharthur Sanjay, Deepanshi Shokeen et al.
1 citations
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
0.33
article

Investigating the ATN (Amyloid, Tau, Neurodegeneration) framework in Alzheimer’s Disease and its causal genetic‐drivers using Digital‐Twins

Jeanne C. Latourelle, Ole Isacson, Apoorva Bharthur Sanjay, Deepanshi Shokeen, Li Sun, So‐Youn Shin
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background Amyloid, Tau and neurodegeneration (ATN), the hallmark pathologies of Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) translating to measurable biomarkers are important for disease modifying therapeutics. Method AD Digital‐Twins were built using AITIA’s patented A.I. platform REFS TM [aitiabio.com], based on a Bayesian network model of ADNI data which reverse‐engineered the connectivity of ∼59K multi‐modal variables and AD‐related outcomes profiled from 317 subjects (Control: MCI: Dementia=97:191:29). The average causal effect of each upstream‐downstream variables was estimated through in‐silico counterfactual experiments to evaluate the temporal relationship between the ATN outcomes, to identify the causal gene‐drivers (at blood RNA‐expression level) of “ATN” outcomes, and to investigate the known AD genotypic variants strongly driving ATN gene‐drivers. Age‐gene interaction was additionally explored through “double‐intervention” experiments, to evaluate age‐specific effects of gene‐drivers on ATN outcomes. Result AD Digital‐Twins evaluated the ATN temporal relationship, and recapitulated some known relationships such that CSF‐abeta and Tau measures drive neurodegeneration measures, although it also showed CSF‐Tau measures to be upstream of amyloid PET, suggesting Tau changes may interact with other outcome changes more dynamically over the course of disease progression (Figure 1). Next, in‐silico experiments identified a total of 228 ATN gene‐drivers, including 8 common to all outcome‐categories, which affect cognitive outcomes as well (Figure 2) and are strongly related to immune‐response and inflammation pathways. Many of these genes were causally driven by multiple AD‐associated genotypic variants reported in GWAS, especially in the “NECTIN2” and “APOE” region. Furthermore, in‐silico experiments showed some Tau‐driving genes are likely to be causally driven by Amyloid and Neurodegeneration driving genes. Lastly, age‐specific effects were observed for a portion of each A‐, T‐ and N‐ gene‐drivers, especially with Tau‐driving genes having a stronger effect with opposite directionality for younger vs older age groups (Figure 3). Conclusion Tau related abnormalities are likely early events in AD progression and more strongly linked to disease pathophysiology. Aitia’s AI platform allows powerful and systematic evaluation of multiple modalities and outcomes, accelerating precision medicine efforts in AD.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S2)
Harvard University (US), McLean Hospital (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
0.33
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.