Pathways towards Cognitive resilience in the context of amyloid pathology: a longitudinal matched study design

Abstract Background Cognitive resilience can be defined as better‐than‐expected cognitive performance in the context of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) pathologies or increased AD risk. We investigated pathways associated with cognitive resilience trajectories in amyloid positive (A+) and/or APOE4 cognitively unimpaired (CU) older adults including brain resilience, resistance to AD pathologies and vascular pathology. Method We included 534 CU ADNI participants with available cognitive data, longitudinal amyloid‐PET ( [ 18 F]florbetaben and [ 18 F]florbetapir) and structural MRI (gray matter volumes) and, as ubset with tau‐PET ( [ 18 F]AV1451) (n = 287) and white matter hyperintensities (n = 467) volume data (n = 534). We performed a one‐to‐one matched design, aligning participants by their baseline amyloid levels, MMSE scores, and age within an average follow‐up time of 6 years (68.18 ±32 months). We identified 44 CU participants ‐ defined as cognitive resilient ‐ who were A+ and/or APOE4 carriers and remained CU and 44 CU A+ matched participants who converted to MCI or AD (non‐resilient). To assess brain resilience, resistance to pathologies and vascular pathways, at baseline, t‐test were performed with gray matter volumes, amyloid (n = 44), tau (n = 12) and WM measurements (n = 27) as outcomes of interest. Longitudinally, linear mixed effect models were used to examine the interaction between cognitive resilient status (resilient vs non) and time on regional amyloid and tau deposition, and gray matter volume. Result At baseline, cognitive resilient participants were characterized by lower tau burden in temporal regions (Figure 1). Longitudinally, cognitive resilient participants showed lower tau accumulation in medial temporal and limbic areas, including the insular and anterior cingulate cortices, and lower volume loss in fusiform, inferior temporal and entorhinal cortex (Figure 2). Unexpectedly, cognitive resilience participants showed greater amyloid increases notably in the anterior cingulate, although both groups showed increased amyloid accumulation. Sensitivity analysis adjusting by conversion time, to rule out the impact of varying accumulation rates due to disease progression, rendered similar results. Conclusion Our results suggest that processes downstream amyloid deposition including resistance to tau and brain maintenance might be key to maintain cognitive function in the presence of amyloid pathology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.090764
Primary Topic
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pathways towards Cognitive resilience in the context of amyloid pathology: a longitudinal matched study design

Müge Akinci, Eleni Palpatzis, Eider M. Arenaza‐Urquijo, Alexandre Bejanin et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
article

Pathways towards Cognitive resilience in the context of amyloid pathology: a longitudinal matched study design

Müge Akinci, Eleni Palpatzis, Eider M. Arenaza‐Urquijo, Alexandre Bejanin, Pablo Aguillar
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Cognitive resilience can be defined as better‐than‐expected cognitive performance in the context of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) pathologies or increased AD risk. We investigated pathways associated with cognitive resilience trajectories in amyloid positive (A+) and/or APOE4 cognitively unimpaired (CU) older adults including brain resilience, resistance to AD pathologies and vascular pathology. Method We included 534 CU ADNI participants with available cognitive data, longitudinal amyloid‐PET ( [ 18 F]florbetaben and [ 18 F]florbetapir) and structural MRI (gray matter volumes) and, as ubset with tau‐PET ( [ 18 F]AV1451) (n = 287) and white matter hyperintensities (n = 467) volume data (n = 534). We performed a one‐to‐one matched design, aligning participants by their baseline amyloid levels, MMSE scores, and age within an average follow‐up time of 6 years (68.18 ±32 months). We identified 44 CU participants ‐ defined as cognitive resilient ‐ who were A+ and/or APOE4 carriers and remained CU and 44 CU A+ matched participants who converted to MCI or AD (non‐resilient). To assess brain resilience, resistance to pathologies and vascular pathways, at baseline, t‐test were performed with gray matter volumes, amyloid (n = 44), tau (n = 12) and WM measurements (n = 27) as outcomes of interest. Longitudinally, linear mixed effect models were used to examine the interaction between cognitive resilient status (resilient vs non) and time on regional amyloid and tau deposition, and gray matter volume. Result At baseline, cognitive resilient participants were characterized by lower tau burden in temporal regions (Figure 1). Longitudinally, cognitive resilient participants showed lower tau accumulation in medial temporal and limbic areas, including the insular and anterior cingulate cortices, and lower volume loss in fusiform, inferior temporal and entorhinal cortex (Figure 2). Unexpectedly, cognitive resilience participants showed greater amyloid increases notably in the anterior cingulate, although both groups showed increased amyloid accumulation. Sensitivity analysis adjusting by conversion time, to rule out the impact of varying accumulation rates due to disease progression, rendered similar results. Conclusion Our results suggest that processes downstream amyloid deposition including resistance to tau and brain maintenance might be key to maintain cognitive function in the presence of amyloid pathology.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S2)
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES), Universitat Pompeu Fabra (ES), Hospital de Sant Pau (ES), Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.