Using image‐text similarity scores from picture descriptions for differentiating the logopenic variant of progressive aphasia from amnestic Alzheimer’s dementia

Abstract Background Primary progressive aphasia (PPA) is a language‐led dementia associated with underlying Alzheimer’s disease (AD) or frontotemporal lobar degeneration pathology. As part of the Alzheimer’s spectrum, logopenic (lv) PPA may be particularly difficult to distinguish from amnestic AD, due to overlapping clinical features. Analysis of linguistic and acoustic variables derived from connected speech has shown promise as a diagnostic tool for differentiating dementia subtypes. Here we investigate the utility of a machine learning (ML)‐based classifier for differentiating lvPPA from amnestic AD using an image‐text similarity metric derived from a picture description task. Method Monolingual English speakers diagnosed with lvPPA (n=18) and amnestic AD (n=14) were asked to describe a picture (Cat Rescue). A similarity score between the image and patient’s transcription was derived with each model of the Vision‐Language encoder CLIP. This involved computing the cosine similarity between the image‐ and transcription‐based representation vectors. These image‐text similarity scores were fed into 10 ML classification algorithms to differentiate lvPPA from amnestic AD. Result For differentiating lvPPA from amnestic AD, our CLIP‐based feedforward neural network classifier achieved F1, AUC, and Accuracy scores of 81%, 80%, and 81% respectively. This outperformed our baselines of stratified random sampling and uniform random sampling by 30%. Conclusion The current study shows promising differentiation of lvPPA from amnestic AD through the single feature of image‐text similarity. This approach holds potential as an automated connected speech analysis tool for differential diagnosis of dementia subtypes. Future directions include evaluating performance in a larger dataset and comparing the classification performance between image‐text similarity and acoustic‐linguistic features.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.092959
Primary Topic
Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using image‐text similarity scores from picture descriptions for differentiating the logopenic variant of progressive aphasia from amnestic Alzheimer’s dementia

Joshua Chang, Jeffrey N. Keller, Jessy Li, Heather Raye Dial et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
article

Using image‐text similarity scores from picture descriptions for differentiating the logopenic variant of progressive aphasia from amnestic Alzheimer’s dementia

Joshua Chang, Jeffrey N. Keller, Jessy Li, Heather Raye Dial, Lisa Wauters, Paul Toprac, Heather Foil, Robin C. Hilsabeck, Maya L. Henry, Patrick Chang, Rosemary A. Lester‐Smith, Avery Largent, Suzanne Schmitz, Lokesha Pugalenthi
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Primary progressive aphasia (PPA) is a language‐led dementia associated with underlying Alzheimer’s disease (AD) or frontotemporal lobar degeneration pathology. As part of the Alzheimer’s spectrum, logopenic (lv) PPA may be particularly difficult to distinguish from amnestic AD, due to overlapping clinical features. Analysis of linguistic and acoustic variables derived from connected speech has shown promise as a diagnostic tool for differentiating dementia subtypes. Here we investigate the utility of a machine learning (ML)‐based classifier for differentiating lvPPA from amnestic AD using an image‐text similarity metric derived from a picture description task. Method Monolingual English speakers diagnosed with lvPPA (n=18) and amnestic AD (n=14) were asked to describe a picture (Cat Rescue). A similarity score between the image and patient’s transcription was derived with each model of the Vision‐Language encoder CLIP. This involved computing the cosine similarity between the image‐ and transcription‐based representation vectors. These image‐text similarity scores were fed into 10 ML classification algorithms to differentiate lvPPA from amnestic AD. Result For differentiating lvPPA from amnestic AD, our CLIP‐based feedforward neural network classifier achieved F1, AUC, and Accuracy scores of 81%, 80%, and 81% respectively. This outperformed our baselines of stratified random sampling and uniform random sampling by 30%. Conclusion The current study shows promising differentiation of lvPPA from amnestic AD through the single feature of image‐text similarity. This approach holds potential as an automated connected speech analysis tool for differential diagnosis of dementia subtypes. Future directions include evaluating performance in a larger dataset and comparing the classification performance between image‐text similarity and acoustic‐linguistic features.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S2)
Pennington Biomedical Research Center (US), The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US), University of Houston (US), Rice University (US), The University of Texas at Austin (US), The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.