Temporal dynamics of brain connectivity across the dementia spectrum

Abstract Background Traditional functional connectivity is calculated as the correlation between resting‐state fMRI time series from pairs of brain regions or networks. Our innovative method extracts time series information from cross‐correlations curves between brain regions, thus deriving the relative duration of functional connections. These temporal analysis methods provide a means for examining how the timing of brain connections is affected across the dementia spectrum. This study extends previous research efforts into understanding the neural correlates of dementia by applying innovative resting‐state functional connectivity analysis methods to a sample of cognitively intact older adults (HC), individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Method 109 participants were included in this analysis (HC: n=47, 29 female, age=72.13±4.68; MCI: n=32, 18 female, age=73.84±5.14; AD: n=30, 19 female, age=77.37±6.45). All study participants were administered the Mini Mental Status Examination (MMSE), and completed MP2RAGE structural imaging and two 15‐minute resting fMRI scans. Cross‐correlation curves were constructed utilizing the Pearson correlation coefficient between pairs of times series for each of the 17 brain networks in the Yeo et al. parcellation. Correlation values were recorded at each of ±20 lags by shifting one of the time points by one volume. Sustained connectivity is derived from the full width at half maximum of the curve (Figure 1A) whereas lag‐based connectivity utilizes the correlation value at each lag. T statistics and p‐values are reported for across‐group connectivity values. Partial correlations were computed between connectivity measures and MMSE scores. All results include controlling for the effects of mean head motion, age, and sex. Result Sustained connectivity demonstrated distributed increases across groups (Figure 1B; HC<MCI<AD; pFDR<.05). At zero‐lag, we see decreased connectivity in MCI and AD compared to HC; however, as lag‐based connectivity is increased, we see increases in connectivity corresponding to diagnostic groups (Figure 2; HC<MCI<AD). Across study participants, both sustained and lag‐based connectivity were negatively correlated with MMSE scores (Figure 3; pFDR <.05). Conclusion Taken together, these findings suggest that functional connections between brain networks persist longer across disease states and that this longer duration of connectivity may reflect increased cognitive demand related to underlying cognitive processes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.093207
Primary Topic
Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Temporal dynamics of brain connectivity across the dementia spectrum

John M. Hoffman, Kevin M. Duff, Jace B. King, Molly B. D. Prigge
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
article

Temporal dynamics of brain connectivity across the dementia spectrum

John M. Hoffman, Kevin M. Duff, Jace B. King, Molly B. D. Prigge
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Traditional functional connectivity is calculated as the correlation between resting‐state fMRI time series from pairs of brain regions or networks. Our innovative method extracts time series information from cross‐correlations curves between brain regions, thus deriving the relative duration of functional connections. These temporal analysis methods provide a means for examining how the timing of brain connections is affected across the dementia spectrum. This study extends previous research efforts into understanding the neural correlates of dementia by applying innovative resting‐state functional connectivity analysis methods to a sample of cognitively intact older adults (HC), individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Method 109 participants were included in this analysis (HC: n=47, 29 female, age=72.13±4.68; MCI: n=32, 18 female, age=73.84±5.14; AD: n=30, 19 female, age=77.37±6.45). All study participants were administered the Mini Mental Status Examination (MMSE), and completed MP2RAGE structural imaging and two 15‐minute resting fMRI scans. Cross‐correlation curves were constructed utilizing the Pearson correlation coefficient between pairs of times series for each of the 17 brain networks in the Yeo et al. parcellation. Correlation values were recorded at each of ±20 lags by shifting one of the time points by one volume. Sustained connectivity is derived from the full width at half maximum of the curve (Figure 1A) whereas lag‐based connectivity utilizes the correlation value at each lag. T statistics and p‐values are reported for across‐group connectivity values. Partial correlations were computed between connectivity measures and MMSE scores. All results include controlling for the effects of mean head motion, age, and sex. Result Sustained connectivity demonstrated distributed increases across groups (Figure 1B; HC<MCI<AD; pFDR<.05). At zero‐lag, we see decreased connectivity in MCI and AD compared to HC; however, as lag‐based connectivity is increased, we see increases in connectivity corresponding to diagnostic groups (Figure 2; HC<MCI<AD). Across study participants, both sustained and lag‐based connectivity were negatively correlated with MMSE scores (Figure 3; pFDR <.05). Conclusion Taken together, these findings suggest that functional connections between brain networks persist longer across disease states and that this longer duration of connectivity may reflect increased cognitive demand related to underlying cognitive processes.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S2)
Oregon Health & Science University (US), University of Utah (US), Huntsman Cancer Institute (US), Layton BioScience (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.