Biological Aging and the Motoric Cognitive Risk Syndrome

Abstract Background Motoric Cognitive Risk (MCR) syndrome is a predementia syndrome characterized by slow gait and subjective cognitive concerns. Individuals with MCR are at high risk of transitioning to both Alzheimer's disease (AD) and vascular dementia. With chronological age, the incidence of MCR increases and MCR cases exhibit a higher prevalence of age‐associated diseases. Biological age reflects an individual's accumulated physiological condition captured by changes at the epigenetic (DNA methylation) as well as proteomic levels (protein expression). Aging varies between individuals and at organ‐specific level within an individual. Our objectives were to (1) examine associations between biological age acceleration and MCR, (2) to identify organs that are aging at faster rate in MCR using novel organ‐specific clocks, and (3) impact of biological aging with mortality in MCR. Method We measured 4,265 proteins in plasma collected at baseline in the LonGenity cohort (n=1,025, Age ≥65 years) – utilizing the SomaScan proteomic assay. Machine learning models were used to derive biological age predictors at the individual level from all the proteins. Organ‐specific ages for 11 organs were also computed from the organ‐specific plasma proteome. Participants were characterized as fast and slow agers based on these clocks. Age acceleration measures were regressed against prevalent and incident MCR using logistic and cox models, respectively. Associations with biological aging were validated using an epigenetic clock (DNAm GrimAge) in HRS (n=1,043). Result Faster biological aging derived from the proteomic clock were associated with prevalent MCR as well as incident MCR. Prevalent MCR was most strongly associated with accelerated aging in muscles (p<0.001) and the heart (p<0.01). Brain, liver, kidney, and immune age acceleration was also nominally associated with prevalent MCR (p<0.05). Participants with both MCR and accelerated aging had the highest risk of mortality, as indicated by proteomic and epigenetic clocks in LonGenity (HR = 3.38) and HRS (HR = 2.47), respectively. Conclusion Accelerated aging is a hallmark of MCR and have an impact on aging of multiple organs. Older individuals with MCR and accelerated aging are at highest risk of mortality. Biological age acceleration may be an important modifiable dementia risk factor.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.089384
Primary Topic
Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Biological Aging and the Motoric Cognitive Risk Syndrome

Sanish Sathyan, Dristi Adhikari, Tony Wyss‐Coray, Jarod Rutledge et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
article

Biological Aging and the Motoric Cognitive Risk Syndrome

Sanish Sathyan, Dristi Adhikari, Tony Wyss‐Coray, Jarod Rutledge, Hamilton Se‐Hwee Oh, Nir Barzilai, Joe Verghese, Sofiya Milman, Ayers Emmeline, Tina Gao
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Motoric Cognitive Risk (MCR) syndrome is a predementia syndrome characterized by slow gait and subjective cognitive concerns. Individuals with MCR are at high risk of transitioning to both Alzheimer's disease (AD) and vascular dementia. With chronological age, the incidence of MCR increases and MCR cases exhibit a higher prevalence of age‐associated diseases. Biological age reflects an individual's accumulated physiological condition captured by changes at the epigenetic (DNA methylation) as well as proteomic levels (protein expression). Aging varies between individuals and at organ‐specific level within an individual. Our objectives were to (1) examine associations between biological age acceleration and MCR, (2) to identify organs that are aging at faster rate in MCR using novel organ‐specific clocks, and (3) impact of biological aging with mortality in MCR. Method We measured 4,265 proteins in plasma collected at baseline in the LonGenity cohort (n=1,025, Age ≥65 years) – utilizing the SomaScan proteomic assay. Machine learning models were used to derive biological age predictors at the individual level from all the proteins. Organ‐specific ages for 11 organs were also computed from the organ‐specific plasma proteome. Participants were characterized as fast and slow agers based on these clocks. Age acceleration measures were regressed against prevalent and incident MCR using logistic and cox models, respectively. Associations with biological aging were validated using an epigenetic clock (DNAm GrimAge) in HRS (n=1,043). Result Faster biological aging derived from the proteomic clock were associated with prevalent MCR as well as incident MCR. Prevalent MCR was most strongly associated with accelerated aging in muscles (p<0.001) and the heart (p<0.01). Brain, liver, kidney, and immune age acceleration was also nominally associated with prevalent MCR (p<0.05). Participants with both MCR and accelerated aging had the highest risk of mortality, as indicated by proteomic and epigenetic clocks in LonGenity (HR = 3.38) and HRS (HR = 2.47), respectively. Conclusion Accelerated aging is a hallmark of MCR and have an impact on aging of multiple organs. Older individuals with MCR and accelerated aging are at highest risk of mortality. Biological age acceleration may be an important modifiable dementia risk factor.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S2)
Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US), Neurosciences Institute (US), Stanford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.