Achieving micron‐level precision MR‐Histology correlation for validating Alzheimer’s disease biomarkers in the human hippocampus

Abstract Background MRI offers potential noninvasive detection of Alzheimer's micropathology. The AD hippocampus exhibits microscopic pathological changes such as tau tangles, iron accumulation and late‐stage amyloid. Validating these changes from ultra‐high‐resolution ex‐vivo MRI through histology is challenging due to nonlinear 3D deformations between MRI and histological samples. We aim to address the challenge by a pipeline (Figure 1) for precise alignment of post‐mortem MRI data with histological images. Method A human hippocampal specimen was dissected from a formalin‐fixed human brain and divided into hippocampal head and tail. We obtained high‐resolution multi‐echo gradient echo ex vivo MRI of each using a 7T Bruker scanner. The specimens were paraffin‐embedded and sectioned using a Leica Histocore Nanocut R microtome. An optical image of the tissue block's surface was captured before each section was cut (Blockface image) using a polarized filter at Brewster’s angle. The obtained 2D blockface images were aligned and filtered into 3D blockface volumes. These were registered with MRI using either Tensor Image Registration Library (TIRL) with Modality Independent Neighbourhood Descriptor, or ANTs SyN registration. Subsequently, the 2D MRI slices corresponding to the stained histology slides were identified in the 3D volume and underwent 2D deformable registration with TIRL or ANTs. To quantify the registration accuracy, we segmented hippocampal volumes into white matter, grey matter, and dentate gyrus for MRI, blockface, and histology data separately. Result When comparing 3D MR and blockface 3D image segmentations (Figure 2, top), the average Dice similarity coefficient of hippocampal head and tail were 86.2% and 86.76% with TIRL, and 83.91% and 78.26% with ANTs SyN. Evaluating 2D MR registration to histological images, TIRL achieves the average Dice coefficient of 94.12% and 96.95%. ANTs performs marginally better across the whole tissue mask, but TIRL shows superior performance in the internal features (Table 1). High‐fidelity alignment shows very small features such as focal hypointensities (Figure 2, bottom, blue circles) and the dentate granule cell layer (orange arrows). Conclusion Our advanced correlative MRI‐histology pipeline achieves micron‐level precision coregistration methods at micron‐scale precision, propelling the development of MRI‐based AD biomarkers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.092110
Primary Topic
Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Achieving micron‐level precision MR‐Histology correlation for validating Alzheimer’s disease biomarkers in the human hippocampus

Michael Zeineh, Marios Georgiadis, Jeffrey Nirschl, William Hai Dang Ho et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
article

Achieving micron‐level precision MR‐Histology correlation for validating Alzheimer’s disease biomarkers in the human hippocampus

Michael Zeineh, Marios Georgiadis, Jeffrey Nirschl, William Hai Dang Ho, Markus Axer, Mirabela Rusu, István N. Huszár, Phillip DiGiacomo, Hossein Moein Taghavi, Wei Shao, Yixin Wang, Samantha Leventis, Philip Schlömer
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background MRI offers potential noninvasive detection of Alzheimer's micropathology. The AD hippocampus exhibits microscopic pathological changes such as tau tangles, iron accumulation and late‐stage amyloid. Validating these changes from ultra‐high‐resolution ex‐vivo MRI through histology is challenging due to nonlinear 3D deformations between MRI and histological samples. We aim to address the challenge by a pipeline (Figure 1) for precise alignment of post‐mortem MRI data with histological images. Method A human hippocampal specimen was dissected from a formalin‐fixed human brain and divided into hippocampal head and tail. We obtained high‐resolution multi‐echo gradient echo ex vivo MRI of each using a 7T Bruker scanner. The specimens were paraffin‐embedded and sectioned using a Leica Histocore Nanocut R microtome. An optical image of the tissue block's surface was captured before each section was cut (Blockface image) using a polarized filter at Brewster’s angle. The obtained 2D blockface images were aligned and filtered into 3D blockface volumes. These were registered with MRI using either Tensor Image Registration Library (TIRL) with Modality Independent Neighbourhood Descriptor, or ANTs SyN registration. Subsequently, the 2D MRI slices corresponding to the stained histology slides were identified in the 3D volume and underwent 2D deformable registration with TIRL or ANTs. To quantify the registration accuracy, we segmented hippocampal volumes into white matter, grey matter, and dentate gyrus for MRI, blockface, and histology data separately. Result When comparing 3D MR and blockface 3D image segmentations (Figure 2, top), the average Dice similarity coefficient of hippocampal head and tail were 86.2% and 86.76% with TIRL, and 83.91% and 78.26% with ANTs SyN. Evaluating 2D MR registration to histological images, TIRL achieves the average Dice coefficient of 94.12% and 96.95%. ANTs performs marginally better across the whole tissue mask, but TIRL shows superior performance in the internal features (Table 1). High‐fidelity alignment shows very small features such as focal hypointensities (Figure 2, bottom, blue circles) and the dentate granule cell layer (orange arrows). Conclusion Our advanced correlative MRI‐histology pipeline achieves micron‐level precision coregistration methods at micron‐scale precision, propelling the development of MRI‐based AD biomarkers.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S2)
Harvard University (US), Forschungszentrum Jülich (DE), University of Florida (US), Stanford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.