Brain Age Gap Correlates with 18F‐NAV‐4694 and 18F‐MK‐6240 Standardized Uptake Value Ratio

Abstract Background It is feasible to train a model on a healthy cohort to estimate the chronological age from a T1‐weighted (T1w) MRI. This model can be used to estimate the apparent brain age of subjects with Alzheimer's Disease (AD). The difference between the true chronological age and the apparent brain age, called Brain Age Gap (BAG), is a potential feature to estimate the level of pathology and neurodegeneration of an individual patient with AD. To further study this, here we examined the linear relationship between BAG and the standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) of the amyloid‐beta tracer (18F‐NAV‐4694) and tau tangle tracer (18F‐MK‐6240). Method We used ∼40K T1w MRIs from the UK Biobank dataset, with improved preprocessing and more extensive data augmentation, to train an SFCN‐reg model (Leonardsen 2022). Our implementation achieved a generalization gap error of less than 1 year, surpassing the performance reported in the original study. Then, using the trained model, we estimated BAG for 245 T1w images from the Translational Biomarkers in Aging and Dementia (TRIAD) dataset (Therriault 2022) consisting of 146 normal controls (NC), 46 with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) due to AD, and 53 with AD dementia. Subsequently, We compared the estimated BAG values with the SUVR values for neocortical amyloid and tau PET meta‐ROI (Jack Jr. 2016). Result Figure 1 illustrates the linear relationship between the 18F‐NAV‐4694 SUVR for all subjects (at baseline scan) vs age (no correlation), apparent brain age (r = 0.31, p << 0.001), and BAG (r = 0.43, p << 0.001). Figure 2 illustrates the linear relationship between the 18F‐MK‐6240 SUVR vs age (r = ‐0.27, p << 0.001), apparent brain age (r = 0.11, p < 0.08), and BAG for the same subjects (r = 0.58, p << 0.001). Conclusion We demonstrated a meaningful relationship between 18F‐NAV‐4694 and 18F‐MK‐6240 SUVR values and BAG, stronger than with age or apparent age, reinforcing the notion that BAG can serve as a feature to estimate the amount of neurodegeneration due to accumulation of amyloid and tau when more precise data, such as PET scans, are not available.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.093282
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Brain Age Gap Correlates with 18F‐NAV‐4694 and 18F‐MK‐6240 Standardized Uptake Value Ratio

Joseph Therriault, Vladimir Fonov, Reza Rajabli, Neda Shafiee et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
article

Brain Age Gap Correlates with 18F‐NAV‐4694 and 18F‐MK‐6240 Standardized Uptake Value Ratio

Joseph Therriault, Vladimir Fonov, Reza Rajabli, Neda Shafiee, Nesrine Rahmouni, Stijn Servaes, D. Louis Collins, Pedro Rosa‐Neto, Mahdie Soltaninejad, Serge Gauthier
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background It is feasible to train a model on a healthy cohort to estimate the chronological age from a T1‐weighted (T1w) MRI. This model can be used to estimate the apparent brain age of subjects with Alzheimer's Disease (AD). The difference between the true chronological age and the apparent brain age, called Brain Age Gap (BAG), is a potential feature to estimate the level of pathology and neurodegeneration of an individual patient with AD. To further study this, here we examined the linear relationship between BAG and the standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) of the amyloid‐beta tracer (18F‐NAV‐4694) and tau tangle tracer (18F‐MK‐6240). Method We used ∼40K T1w MRIs from the UK Biobank dataset, with improved preprocessing and more extensive data augmentation, to train an SFCN‐reg model (Leonardsen 2022). Our implementation achieved a generalization gap error of less than 1 year, surpassing the performance reported in the original study. Then, using the trained model, we estimated BAG for 245 T1w images from the Translational Biomarkers in Aging and Dementia (TRIAD) dataset (Therriault 2022) consisting of 146 normal controls (NC), 46 with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) due to AD, and 53 with AD dementia. Subsequently, We compared the estimated BAG values with the SUVR values for neocortical amyloid and tau PET meta‐ROI (Jack Jr. 2016). Result Figure 1 illustrates the linear relationship between the 18F‐NAV‐4694 SUVR for all subjects (at baseline scan) vs age (no correlation), apparent brain age (r = 0.31, p << 0.001), and BAG (r = 0.43, p << 0.001). Figure 2 illustrates the linear relationship between the 18F‐MK‐6240 SUVR vs age (r = ‐0.27, p << 0.001), apparent brain age (r = 0.11, p < 0.08), and BAG for the same subjects (r = 0.58, p << 0.001). Conclusion We demonstrated a meaningful relationship between 18F‐NAV‐4694 and 18F‐MK‐6240 SUVR values and BAG, stronger than with age or apparent age, reinforcing the notion that BAG can serve as a feature to estimate the amount of neurodegeneration due to accumulation of amyloid and tau when more precise data, such as PET scans, are not available.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S2)
Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital (CA), Douglas Mental Health University Institute (CA), McGill University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.