Revised Criteria for Diagnosis and Staging of Alzheimer’s Disease

Abstract The National Institute on Aging and the Alzheimer’s Association (NIA‐AA) convened three separate work groups in 2011 and a single work group in 2018 to create recommendations for the diagnosis and characterization of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Several fundamental principles emerged from these efforts. These include, AD should be defined biologically, not by clinical syndromes. The disease is a continuum that is first evident with the appearance of brain pathologic changes in asymptomatic individuals and progresses through stages of increasing pathologic burden eventually leading to appearance/progression of clinical symptoms. The Revised Criteria for Diagnosis and Staging of Alzheimer's Disease is the product of a work group sponsored by the Alzheimer’s Association. The revised Criteria update the 2018 Research Framework in response to major recent developments. First, since 2018, for the first time, treatments that target core disease pathology have received regulatory approval. Second, accepted biomarkers in 2018 were either CSF assays or imaging. Since then, plasma‐based biomarkers were developed, and some (but not all) demonstrate excellent diagnostic performance. The objective of the work group was to propose objective criteria for diagnosis and staging AD to serve as a bridge between research and clinical care. These criteria are not intended to be specific clinical practise guidelines, but rather criteria for diagnosis and staging of AD that reflect current science. Defining neurodegenerative diseases by their underlying biology rather than by non‐specific syndromic presentations has gained momentum in recent years. In addition, investigators increasingly recognize that across the spectrum of neurodegenerative disorders, the disease progresses along a continuum that begins with the appearance of the defining neuropathology while patients are asymptomatic. This symposium will examine the unifying theme of biologically based diagnosis and staging across neurodegenerative diseases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.095054
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.61
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Revised Criteria for Diagnosis and Staging of Alzheimer’s Disease

Clifford R. Jack
8 citations
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
2.61
article

Revised Criteria for Diagnosis and Staging of Alzheimer’s Disease

Clifford R. Jack
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Abstract The National Institute on Aging and the Alzheimer’s Association (NIA‐AA) convened three separate work groups in 2011 and a single work group in 2018 to create recommendations for the diagnosis and characterization of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Several fundamental principles emerged from these efforts. These include, AD should be defined biologically, not by clinical syndromes. The disease is a continuum that is first evident with the appearance of brain pathologic changes in asymptomatic individuals and progresses through stages of increasing pathologic burden eventually leading to appearance/progression of clinical symptoms. The Revised Criteria for Diagnosis and Staging of Alzheimer's Disease is the product of a work group sponsored by the Alzheimer’s Association. The revised Criteria update the 2018 Research Framework in response to major recent developments. First, since 2018, for the first time, treatments that target core disease pathology have received regulatory approval. Second, accepted biomarkers in 2018 were either CSF assays or imaging. Since then, plasma‐based biomarkers were developed, and some (but not all) demonstrate excellent diagnostic performance. The objective of the work group was to propose objective criteria for diagnosis and staging AD to serve as a bridge between research and clinical care. These criteria are not intended to be specific clinical practise guidelines, but rather criteria for diagnosis and staging of AD that reflect current science. Defining neurodegenerative diseases by their underlying biology rather than by non‐specific syndromic presentations has gained momentum in recent years. In addition, investigators increasingly recognize that across the spectrum of neurodegenerative disorders, the disease progresses along a continuum that begins with the appearance of the defining neuropathology while patients are asymptomatic. This symposium will examine the unifying theme of biologically based diagnosis and staging across neurodegenerative diseases.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S2)
Mayo Clinic in Arizona (US)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
2.61
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Revised Criteria for Diagnosis and Staging of Alzheimer’s Disease — Clifford R. Jack · Alzheimer s & Dementia (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS