Tear Biomarkers as Indicators of Alzheimer's Disease

Abstract Background The prevalence of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is increasing worldwide, particularly in low‐ to middle‐income countries (LMICs). Resource limitations and time constraints in many LMICs make AD screening and diagnosis difficult in the clinical setting. Neurodegenerative biomarkers in human tears may be associated with neurodegenerative diseases, but its potential has yet to be investigated in AD. Amyloid‐beta, tau, α‐synuclein, and neurofilament light (NfL) levels in tears were compared in patients with AD (AD+) and age‐matched negative controls (AD‐). Methods Samples were collected from a cohort of AD+ (N=26) and age‐matched AD‐ (N=9) individuals at a public neurological hospital in Lima, Peru. Tears were collected on Schirmer strips, which were dried and frozen. Proteins were then extracted into a PBS‐based buffer and tested for biomarkers using commercial ELISA kits, Luminex assays, and digital ELISA methods from Quanterix and NanoMosaic. Biomarker burdens were compared between AD+ and AD‐ patients using digital ELISA results. Amyloid‐beta 40, Amyloid‐beta 42, total tau, phosphorylated‐tau181 (pTau181), α‐synuclein, and NfL burdens were evaluated using various ELISA methods, and Human TIMP‐1 was used as a control. Results Initial analyses using commercial ELISA and Luminex methods proved inconclusive. NfL burden was evaluated using the Quanterix digital ELISA platform showed a detectable protein burden in 3 AD‐ samples and 1 AD+ samples, but remained statistically insignificant (p = 0.45). A custom digital ELISA assay on the NanoMosaic platform showed AD+ status was associated with elevated Total Tau (p = 0.0023) and pTau181 (p = 0.0016) burden in tear proteome as compared to AD‐ samples, shown in Figures 1 and 2. Conclusions Due to considerably lower limits of detection, the Quanterix and custom NanoMosaic assays allowed for increased sensitivity of biomarker detection in human tears. Our results indicate a significant association between AD+ status and elevated Total Tau and pTau181 levels in tears, and suggest the potential for tears to be pursued as a potential non‐invasive and accessible addition to AD screening and diagnosis, particularly for LMICs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.089809
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.54
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tear Biomarkers as Indicators of Alzheimer's Disease

Maisie Bailey, Anshule Takyar, Monica M. Diaz, Robert H. Gilman et al.
1 citations
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
0.54
article

Tear Biomarkers as Indicators of Alzheimer's Disease

Maisie Bailey, Anshule Takyar, Monica M. Diaz, Robert H. Gilman, Danilo A Sanchez Coronel, Héctor H. García, Richard Trantow
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background The prevalence of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is increasing worldwide, particularly in low‐ to middle‐income countries (LMICs). Resource limitations and time constraints in many LMICs make AD screening and diagnosis difficult in the clinical setting. Neurodegenerative biomarkers in human tears may be associated with neurodegenerative diseases, but its potential has yet to be investigated in AD. Amyloid‐beta, tau, α‐synuclein, and neurofilament light (NfL) levels in tears were compared in patients with AD (AD+) and age‐matched negative controls (AD‐). Methods Samples were collected from a cohort of AD+ (N=26) and age‐matched AD‐ (N=9) individuals at a public neurological hospital in Lima, Peru. Tears were collected on Schirmer strips, which were dried and frozen. Proteins were then extracted into a PBS‐based buffer and tested for biomarkers using commercial ELISA kits, Luminex assays, and digital ELISA methods from Quanterix and NanoMosaic. Biomarker burdens were compared between AD+ and AD‐ patients using digital ELISA results. Amyloid‐beta 40, Amyloid‐beta 42, total tau, phosphorylated‐tau181 (pTau181), α‐synuclein, and NfL burdens were evaluated using various ELISA methods, and Human TIMP‐1 was used as a control. Results Initial analyses using commercial ELISA and Luminex methods proved inconclusive. NfL burden was evaluated using the Quanterix digital ELISA platform showed a detectable protein burden in 3 AD‐ samples and 1 AD+ samples, but remained statistically insignificant (p = 0.45). A custom digital ELISA assay on the NanoMosaic platform showed AD+ status was associated with elevated Total Tau (p = 0.0023) and pTau181 (p = 0.0016) burden in tear proteome as compared to AD‐ samples, shown in Figures 1 and 2. Conclusions Due to considerably lower limits of detection, the Quanterix and custom NanoMosaic assays allowed for increased sensitivity of biomarker detection in human tears. Our results indicate a significant association between AD+ status and elevated Total Tau and pTau181 levels in tears, and suggest the potential for tears to be pursued as a potential non‐invasive and accessible addition to AD screening and diagnosis, particularly for LMICs.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S2)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), Oregon Health & Science University (US), Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia (PE), Alaska Department of Health and Social Services (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
0.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.