Clinical performance of the Lumipulse G NfL CSF assay in cases with AD and FTD

Abstract Background Neurofilament light chain (NfL) is a fluid biomarker of axonal damage reported to be elevated in cases with dementia, and particularly in FTD. In this study we evaluate the performance of a recently developed NfL assay to be analyzed through the Lumipulse chemiluminescent platform, which is frequently available in clinical settings for the study of AD core biomarkers. Method We evaluated CSF NfL levels using the Lumipulse G600II platform (Fujirebio, Iberia) in 70 cases, including 33 patients with AD (supported by CSF biomarkers consistent with an A+T+(N)+ classification scheme), 26 with confirmed FTD (typical phenotype and CSF with a A‐T‐ profile), and 11 controls. NfL was also determined in plasma samples of the same cases by single molecule array (SIMOA) with a Quanterix assay. We analyzed the correlation of NfL as measured in these two samples by the two different platforms and their value to discriminate between AD and FTD cases. Result NfL in CSF was higher in FTD (mean‐SD= 2417‐2326 pg/mL) than in AD cases (1144‐594, p=0.07) and controls (809‐327, p=0.03), with no differences between AD and controls. The same applied for plasma NfL with more remarkable statistical differences: FTD (mean‐SD= 37‐21) vs AD cases (19‐7, p>0.001) and vs controls (18‐7, p=0.007). There was a significant linear correlation between NfL values in CSF and plasma in all cases (Pearson R=0.84, p<0.001). By groups, the correlation was higher in FTD cases (R=0.83) and controls (R=0.89) than in AD cases (R=0.46). The best discrimination between FTD and AD cases for CSF NfL was obtained at 1671 pg/mL (AUC: 0.675, 59% sensitivity, 90.6% specificity), while levels of 1395 pg/mL obtained the best discrimination between FTD and controls (AUC: 0.777, sensitivity 64%, specificity 100%). Conclusion The Lumipulse NfL CSF assay could be useful in clinical settings to improve discrimination among dementia subtypes and controls. Elevated NfL CSF levels are highly specific of FTD and correlate well with plasma levels. Furthermore, NfL levels may support an underlying neurodegenerative process in cases with ambiguous phenotype and an A‐T‐(N)‐ CSF profile.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.087868
Primary Topic
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical performance of the Lumipulse G NfL CSF assay in cases with AD and FTD

Ignacio Mahíllo, Agustı́n Ruiz, Raquel Téllez, Estrella Gómez‐Tortosa et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
article

Clinical performance of the Lumipulse G NfL CSF assay in cases with AD and FTD

Ignacio Mahíllo, Agustı́n Ruiz, Raquel Téllez, Estrella Gómez‐Tortosa, Pascual Sánchez‐Juan, Agustín Querejeta, Lucía Cremades‐Jimeno, Pablo Agüero, Sonia Wagner, María José Sainz, Alicia Gonzales
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Neurofilament light chain (NfL) is a fluid biomarker of axonal damage reported to be elevated in cases with dementia, and particularly in FTD. In this study we evaluate the performance of a recently developed NfL assay to be analyzed through the Lumipulse chemiluminescent platform, which is frequently available in clinical settings for the study of AD core biomarkers. Method We evaluated CSF NfL levels using the Lumipulse G600II platform (Fujirebio, Iberia) in 70 cases, including 33 patients with AD (supported by CSF biomarkers consistent with an A+T+(N)+ classification scheme), 26 with confirmed FTD (typical phenotype and CSF with a A‐T‐ profile), and 11 controls. NfL was also determined in plasma samples of the same cases by single molecule array (SIMOA) with a Quanterix assay. We analyzed the correlation of NfL as measured in these two samples by the two different platforms and their value to discriminate between AD and FTD cases. Result NfL in CSF was higher in FTD (mean‐SD= 2417‐2326 pg/mL) than in AD cases (1144‐594, p=0.07) and controls (809‐327, p=0.03), with no differences between AD and controls. The same applied for plasma NfL with more remarkable statistical differences: FTD (mean‐SD= 37‐21) vs AD cases (19‐7, p>0.001) and vs controls (18‐7, p=0.007). There was a significant linear correlation between NfL values in CSF and plasma in all cases (Pearson R=0.84, p<0.001). By groups, the correlation was higher in FTD cases (R=0.83) and controls (R=0.89) than in AD cases (R=0.46). The best discrimination between FTD and AD cases for CSF NfL was obtained at 1671 pg/mL (AUC: 0.675, 59% sensitivity, 90.6% specificity), while levels of 1395 pg/mL obtained the best discrimination between FTD and controls (AUC: 0.777, sensitivity 64%, specificity 100%). Conclusion The Lumipulse NfL CSF assay could be useful in clinical settings to improve discrimination among dementia subtypes and controls. Elevated NfL CSF levels are highly specific of FTD and correlate well with plasma levels. Furthermore, NfL levels may support an underlying neurodegenerative process in cases with ambiguous phenotype and an A‐T‐(N)‐ CSF profile.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S2)
Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ES), Hospital Universitario Rey Juan Carlos (ES), Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz (ES), Fundacion Centro De Investigacion De Enfermedades Neurologicas (ES)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.