Circulating proteins associated with rate of cognitive decline based on APOE genotype

Abstract Background APOE genotype is the most important genetic risk factor for Alzheimer’s disease (AD), but whether it affects the proteins associated with AD risk is unclear. Circulating proteins may reveal biology underlying pathologic processes. Methods We evaluated log2 standardized levels of 4979 proteins quantified using modified aptamer technology [SomaScan] in plasma from 2725 participants in the Cardiovascular Health Study who were free of dementia and stroke. Participants were recruited from 4 sites in the United States and plasma samples were obtained in 1992/1993. Cognitive decline was measured with annual modified mini mental state exams (3MSE) and digit symbol substitution tests (DSST) over 7 years. APOE genotype was classified as e4 carrier, e2 carrier, or non‐carrier. Adjusting for sex, age, race, education, and study site, we used linear mixed effects modeling to evaluate whether the association of each protein with rate of cognitive decline differed based on APOE genotype. We ran two models: one comparing APOE e4 to the other genotypes and another comparing APOE e2 to the other genotypes. A p‐value of 2.1x10 ‐5 was considered significant. Results Mean age of participants was 74 years, 61% were female, 15% were Black, 25% were APOE e4 carriers, 17% were APOE e2 carriers, and mean cognitive follow‐up was 5.2 years. For 3MSE, 38 proteins had significant interactions with time and APOE e4 carrier status (Table 1) and 15 proteins with APOE e2 carrier status (Table 2). For DSST, only 3 proteins had significant interaction with time and APOE e4 carrier status and none with APOE e2. Proteins included those involved in lipid transport, neuronal differentiation, immune response, and cell signaling. Conclusions Large‐scale proteomic profiling identified circulating proteins differentially associated with cognitive decline based on APOE genotype. Many of the proteins are involved in pathways previously implicated in AD risk. Replication and other characterization are needed to clarify how APOE genotype may affect mechanisms involved in cognitive decline and AD risk.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.086739
Primary Topic
Protein Hydrolysis and Bioactive Peptides
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Circulating proteins associated with rate of cognitive decline based on APOE genotype

Sudha S. Seshadri, Diane Xue, Alison E. Fohner, Emily H. Trittschuh et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Protein Hydrolysis and Bioactive Peptides
article

Circulating proteins associated with rate of cognitive decline based on APOE genotype

Sudha S. Seshadri, Diane Xue, Alison E. Fohner, Emily H. Trittschuh, W. T. Longstreth, Colleen M. Sitlani, Robert E. Gerszten, Thomas R. Austin, Jennifer A. Brody, Michelle C. Odden, Bruce M. Psaty
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background APOE genotype is the most important genetic risk factor for Alzheimer’s disease (AD), but whether it affects the proteins associated with AD risk is unclear. Circulating proteins may reveal biology underlying pathologic processes. Methods We evaluated log2 standardized levels of 4979 proteins quantified using modified aptamer technology [SomaScan] in plasma from 2725 participants in the Cardiovascular Health Study who were free of dementia and stroke. Participants were recruited from 4 sites in the United States and plasma samples were obtained in 1992/1993. Cognitive decline was measured with annual modified mini mental state exams (3MSE) and digit symbol substitution tests (DSST) over 7 years. APOE genotype was classified as e4 carrier, e2 carrier, or non‐carrier. Adjusting for sex, age, race, education, and study site, we used linear mixed effects modeling to evaluate whether the association of each protein with rate of cognitive decline differed based on APOE genotype. We ran two models: one comparing APOE e4 to the other genotypes and another comparing APOE e2 to the other genotypes. A p‐value of 2.1x10 ‐5 was considered significant. Results Mean age of participants was 74 years, 61% were female, 15% were Black, 25% were APOE e4 carriers, 17% were APOE e2 carriers, and mean cognitive follow‐up was 5.2 years. For 3MSE, 38 proteins had significant interactions with time and APOE e4 carrier status (Table 1) and 15 proteins with APOE e2 carrier status (Table 2). For DSST, only 3 proteins had significant interaction with time and APOE e4 carrier status and none with APOE e2. Proteins included those involved in lipid transport, neuronal differentiation, immune response, and cell signaling. Conclusions Large‐scale proteomic profiling identified circulating proteins differentially associated with cognitive decline based on APOE genotype. Many of the proteins are involved in pathways previously implicated in AD risk. Replication and other characterization are needed to clarify how APOE genotype may affect mechanisms involved in cognitive decline and AD risk.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S2)
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US), University of Puget Sound (US), The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US), University of Washington (US), Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center (US), Stanford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Protein Hydrolysis and Bioactive Peptides
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.