Cerebrovascular reactivity as a candidate biomarker in small vessel disease related VCID

Abstract Background The brain’s ability to perform a cognitive task is a dynamic process and requires small blood vessels to dilate or constrict in real time to adjust blood flow in a region‐specific manner. Cerebrovascular Reactivity (CVR) measures the ability of vessels to react to vasoactive challenges. In this work, we investigated the role of CVR as a possible biomarker in small vessel disease related vascular contributions to cognitive impairment and dementia (VCID), as part of the NINDS‐funded MarkVCID study. Methods This work consisted of 4 studies. CVR was measured by MRI signal changes in response to inhalation of 5% carbon dioxide (CO2) (Figure 1). Study 1 was a single‐site study of 72 participants (aged 69±8 years, 28 normal cognition and 44 cognitive impairment), in which we examined the relationship between CVR and cognitive function, CSF‐measured AD pathological markers, and CDR‐sum‐of‐boxes. Study 2 conducted an instrumental validation to benchmark the test‐retest reproducibility of the CVR measure. Study 3 developed an automatic, cloud‐based tool for automatic and standardized processing of CVR MRI data. Study 4 was a multi‐site biological validation study in which CVR was measured across 3 sites and data from each site were separately analyzed to investigate the relationship between CVR and cognitive function. Results Study 1 revealed that whole‐brain CVR was associated with MoCA (β=29.64, 95% CI, 9.94 to 49.34) and global composite scores (β=4.32, 95% CI, 0.05 to 8.58), and these associations were independent of CSF‐measured amyloid and tau markers. CVR was also associated with CDR‐SB score. Study 2 revealed that inter‐scanner CoV of CVR was 6.90 ± 5.08% and had an ICC of 0.8498. Study 3 showed that CVR processing can be standardized and the processing pipeline can be accessed by any researchers around the world through an installation‐free cloud platform referred to as MRICloud ( https://braingps.mricloud.org/cvr.v5 ). Study 4 showed that CVR was significantly associated with MoCA in data analyzed separately in each of the three sites through a pre‐defined analysis (p=0.003, 0.002, 0.046 for the three sites, respectively; when pooling data together p=3.7*10^‐6) (Figure 2). Conclusion CVR measured with MRI is a promising candidate biomarker in VCID.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.086585
Primary Topic
Renal and Vascular Pathologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cerebrovascular reactivity as a candidate biomarker in small vessel disease related VCID

Hanzhang Lu
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Renal and Vascular Pathologies
article

Cerebrovascular reactivity as a candidate biomarker in small vessel disease related VCID

Hanzhang Lu
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background The brain’s ability to perform a cognitive task is a dynamic process and requires small blood vessels to dilate or constrict in real time to adjust blood flow in a region‐specific manner. Cerebrovascular Reactivity (CVR) measures the ability of vessels to react to vasoactive challenges. In this work, we investigated the role of CVR as a possible biomarker in small vessel disease related vascular contributions to cognitive impairment and dementia (VCID), as part of the NINDS‐funded MarkVCID study. Methods This work consisted of 4 studies. CVR was measured by MRI signal changes in response to inhalation of 5% carbon dioxide (CO2) (Figure 1). Study 1 was a single‐site study of 72 participants (aged 69±8 years, 28 normal cognition and 44 cognitive impairment), in which we examined the relationship between CVR and cognitive function, CSF‐measured AD pathological markers, and CDR‐sum‐of‐boxes. Study 2 conducted an instrumental validation to benchmark the test‐retest reproducibility of the CVR measure. Study 3 developed an automatic, cloud‐based tool for automatic and standardized processing of CVR MRI data. Study 4 was a multi‐site biological validation study in which CVR was measured across 3 sites and data from each site were separately analyzed to investigate the relationship between CVR and cognitive function. Results Study 1 revealed that whole‐brain CVR was associated with MoCA (β=29.64, 95% CI, 9.94 to 49.34) and global composite scores (β=4.32, 95% CI, 0.05 to 8.58), and these associations were independent of CSF‐measured amyloid and tau markers. CVR was also associated with CDR‐SB score. Study 2 revealed that inter‐scanner CoV of CVR was 6.90 ± 5.08% and had an ICC of 0.8498. Study 3 showed that CVR processing can be standardized and the processing pipeline can be accessed by any researchers around the world through an installation‐free cloud platform referred to as MRICloud ( https://braingps.mricloud.org/cvr.v5 ). Study 4 showed that CVR was significantly associated with MoCA in data analyzed separately in each of the three sites through a pre‐defined analysis (p=0.003, 0.002, 0.046 for the three sites, respectively; when pooling data together p=3.7*10^‐6) (Figure 2). Conclusion CVR measured with MRI is a promising candidate biomarker in VCID.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S2)
Johns Hopkins University (US), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Renal and Vascular Pathologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.