Towards Automatic Early Detection: Assessing LANGaware's Language and Speech Biomarkers in Neurocognitive and Affective Disorders

Abstract Background Recent advancements in automatic language and speech analysis, coupled with machine learning (ML) methods, showcase the effectiveness of digital biomarkers in non‐invasively detecting subtle changes in cognitive status. While successfully distinguishing between Alzheimer's Disease (AD) and Normal Control (NC) individuals, classifying Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) proves to be a more challenging task. MCI can progress to AD or result from various factors, including affective disorders, necessitating multiple expert examinations for accurate detection. Building upon previous research, we create an experimental setup to assess LANGaware’s biomarkers pool on three objectives: a) binary separation into Dementia and NC cohorts, b) broad three‐class separation into Dementia, NC, and MCI groups, c) binary differentiation into Depression coupled with Anxiety disorder and NC cohorts. Method Patient audio recordings and ASR‐generated transcripts were fed into LANGaware’s multimodal ML pipeline, extracting hundreds of linguistic and audio features, distilled into interpretable categories with a neural network assigning weights. These categorical values served as inputs to a final neural network layer generating probabilities for target labels (Dementia, NC). Similar methodologies were applied to our second (Dementia vs MCI vs NC) and third discrimination task (Depression/Anxiety vs NC), where the neural network allocated varying weights to input features for each of the aforementioned cases. Result In all scenarios, data were split into a 70% training set and a 30% testing set, validated against medical expert diagnosis. For binary separation, with 2927 Dementia and 815 NC instances, the model demonstrated 89% accuracy and an 85% macro‐averaged F1 score. For three‐class separation (3752 Dementia, 1117 NC, 5993 MCI instances), the model achieved 70% accuracy and a 71% F1 score. Discriminating affective disorders (1016 Depression/Anxiety, 1630 NC instances) resulted in 71% accuracy and a 71% F1 score. Conclusion The assessment suggests that our modelling approach aptly discerns language and speech patterns, distinguishing individuals with MCI from those with Dementia or in optimal health (NC). These outcomes contribute significantly to automatic evaluation, offering early diagnosis and timely treatment access. Our third experiment showcases the methodology's applicability in detecting affective disorders, specifically Depression and Anxiety, which may co‐occur with or precede MCI.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.088700
Primary Topic
Language Development and Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Towards Automatic Early Detection: Assessing LANGaware's Language and Speech Biomarkers in Neurocognitive and Affective Disorders

Admir Demiraj, Dimitra Sali, Vassiliki Rentoumi, George Paliouras et al.
1 links
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Language Development and Disorders
article

Towards Automatic Early Detection: Assessing LANGaware's Language and Speech Biomarkers in Neurocognitive and Affective Disorders

Admir Demiraj, Dimitra Sali, Vassiliki Rentoumi, George Paliouras, Evangelos E. Vassiliou
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Recent advancements in automatic language and speech analysis, coupled with machine learning (ML) methods, showcase the effectiveness of digital biomarkers in non‐invasively detecting subtle changes in cognitive status. While successfully distinguishing between Alzheimer's Disease (AD) and Normal Control (NC) individuals, classifying Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) proves to be a more challenging task. MCI can progress to AD or result from various factors, including affective disorders, necessitating multiple expert examinations for accurate detection. Building upon previous research, we create an experimental setup to assess LANGaware’s biomarkers pool on three objectives: a) binary separation into Dementia and NC cohorts, b) broad three‐class separation into Dementia, NC, and MCI groups, c) binary differentiation into Depression coupled with Anxiety disorder and NC cohorts. Method Patient audio recordings and ASR‐generated transcripts were fed into LANGaware’s multimodal ML pipeline, extracting hundreds of linguistic and audio features, distilled into interpretable categories with a neural network assigning weights. These categorical values served as inputs to a final neural network layer generating probabilities for target labels (Dementia, NC). Similar methodologies were applied to our second (Dementia vs MCI vs NC) and third discrimination task (Depression/Anxiety vs NC), where the neural network allocated varying weights to input features for each of the aforementioned cases. Result In all scenarios, data were split into a 70% training set and a 30% testing set, validated against medical expert diagnosis. For binary separation, with 2927 Dementia and 815 NC instances, the model demonstrated 89% accuracy and an 85% macro‐averaged F1 score. For three‐class separation (3752 Dementia, 1117 NC, 5993 MCI instances), the model achieved 70% accuracy and a 71% F1 score. Discriminating affective disorders (1016 Depression/Anxiety, 1630 NC instances) resulted in 71% accuracy and a 71% F1 score. Conclusion The assessment suggests that our modelling approach aptly discerns language and speech patterns, distinguishing individuals with MCI from those with Dementia or in optimal health (NC). These outcomes contribute significantly to automatic evaluation, offering early diagnosis and timely treatment access. Our third experiment showcases the methodology's applicability in detecting affective disorders, specifically Depression and Anxiety, which may co‐occur with or precede MCI.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S2)
National Centre of Scientific Research "Demokritos" (GR), University of the Aegean (GR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Language Development and Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.