Multi‐tissue metabolomics analyses identify disrupted processes in Alzheimer’s Disease

Abstract Background Brain 1,2 , cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) 3,4 , and plasma 5,6 metabolomics have been informative in identifying disrupted metabolism pathways in Alzheimer’s disease (AD). However, many AD‐focused metabolomics studies profiled a relatively small number of individuals and metabolites 3–6 , especially for CSF. In addition, past studies were limited to one or two tissues. Here we present a large‐scaled three‐tissue metabolomics study for Alzheimer’s disease. Method The cohorts of our study include Knight‐ADRC, DIAN, ADNI, Barcelona‐1, and Fundació ACE. In this study, 362 brain samples (N.ctrl = 27, N.AD = 335), 1,974 CSF samples (N.ctrl = 855, N.AD = 1,119), and 2,369 plasma samples (N.ctrl = 1,274, N.AD = 1,095) were included. The HD4 Metabolon platform was used to measure metabolomics of plasma, CSF, and brain samples. There were 797, 456, and 1,508, metabolites quantified in brain, CSF and plasma tissues. Linear regression model including age, sex, post‐mortem interval was used to identify differentially present metabolites. FDR correction was applied to the analyzed metabolites. Result The analyses in brain, CSF, and plasma identified 3, 65, and 553 metabolites differentially presented in AD compared to healthy controls after FDR multiple‐test correction. There were 31 metabolites shared between plasma and CSF, in which 28 having consistent direction of effects. Of the 31 CSF‐plasma shared metabolites, four metabolites (3‐hydroxyisolutyrate, alpha‐hydroxyisovalerate, ergothionenine, guaiacol sulfate), belonging to the branched‐chain amino acids (BCAAs) or xenobiotics, were nominally significant in brain. The two BCAA‐related metabolites, 3‐hydroxyisolutyrate and alpha‐hydroxyisovalerate, were replicated in another brain study 1 . Higher 3‐hydroxyisolutyrate 7 has been associated with obesity, a risk factor for AD. We found that ergothioneine level was low in AD and a recent study showed that this metabolite improved amyloid beta clearance 8 in a mouse model. Using metabolites differentially abundant in the plasma tissue, we found BCAA biosynthesis, taurine metabolism, starch and sucrose metabolism, and tryptophan metabolism pathways being altered in AD. Conclusion Our study performed the first multi‐tissue metabolomics analyses on Alzheimer’s disease. We identified concordant effects across tissues for many differentially abundant metabolites. The shared metabolites throughout tissues were closely linked to the Alzheimer’s disease.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.090813
Primary Topic
Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multi‐tissue metabolomics analyses identify disrupted processes in Alzheimer’s Disease

Agustı́n Ruiz, Pau Pástor, Carlos C Cruchaga, Muhammad Ali et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
article

Multi‐tissue metabolomics analyses identify disrupted processes in Alzheimer’s Disease

Agustı́n Ruiz, Pau Pástor, Carlos C Cruchaga, Muhammad Ali, Ciyang Wang, Yun Ju Sung, Gyujin Heo, Menghan Liu, Jigyasha Timsina
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Brain 1,2 , cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) 3,4 , and plasma 5,6 metabolomics have been informative in identifying disrupted metabolism pathways in Alzheimer’s disease (AD). However, many AD‐focused metabolomics studies profiled a relatively small number of individuals and metabolites 3–6 , especially for CSF. In addition, past studies were limited to one or two tissues. Here we present a large‐scaled three‐tissue metabolomics study for Alzheimer’s disease. Method The cohorts of our study include Knight‐ADRC, DIAN, ADNI, Barcelona‐1, and Fundació ACE. In this study, 362 brain samples (N.ctrl = 27, N.AD = 335), 1,974 CSF samples (N.ctrl = 855, N.AD = 1,119), and 2,369 plasma samples (N.ctrl = 1,274, N.AD = 1,095) were included. The HD4 Metabolon platform was used to measure metabolomics of plasma, CSF, and brain samples. There were 797, 456, and 1,508, metabolites quantified in brain, CSF and plasma tissues. Linear regression model including age, sex, post‐mortem interval was used to identify differentially present metabolites. FDR correction was applied to the analyzed metabolites. Result The analyses in brain, CSF, and plasma identified 3, 65, and 553 metabolites differentially presented in AD compared to healthy controls after FDR multiple‐test correction. There were 31 metabolites shared between plasma and CSF, in which 28 having consistent direction of effects. Of the 31 CSF‐plasma shared metabolites, four metabolites (3‐hydroxyisolutyrate, alpha‐hydroxyisovalerate, ergothionenine, guaiacol sulfate), belonging to the branched‐chain amino acids (BCAAs) or xenobiotics, were nominally significant in brain. The two BCAA‐related metabolites, 3‐hydroxyisolutyrate and alpha‐hydroxyisovalerate, were replicated in another brain study 1 . Higher 3‐hydroxyisolutyrate 7 has been associated with obesity, a risk factor for AD. We found that ergothioneine level was low in AD and a recent study showed that this metabolite improved amyloid beta clearance 8 in a mouse model. Using metabolites differentially abundant in the plasma tissue, we found BCAA biosynthesis, taurine metabolism, starch and sucrose metabolism, and tryptophan metabolism pathways being altered in AD. Conclusion Our study performed the first multi‐tissue metabolomics analyses on Alzheimer’s disease. We identified concordant effects across tissues for many differentially abundant metabolites. The shared metabolites throughout tissues were closely linked to the Alzheimer’s disease.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S2)
Washington University in St. Louis (US), Hope Center for Neurological Disorders (US), Fundació ACE (ES), Mútua Terrassa (ES), NeoGenomics (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.