Meta‐Analysis & Review of Blood Neurofilament Light Performance in Diagnosis of All‐Cause Dementia

Abstract Background NfL is a non‐specific biomarker that elevates in the presence of axonal damage. In the blood, it has recently been explored as a potential test in evaluating the presence or absence of dementia. Method A systematic review and meta‐analysis of 58 studies examining plasma or serum NfL levels as measured on a single molecule array (SIMOA) platform was used to determine the discriminatory capacity of using NfL to distinguish between healthy controls and patients with dementia. Result NfL provides reasonable discriminatory capacity between healthy controls and patients with all‐cause dementia (serum AUC=0.85, plasma AUC=0.75). For a reasonable range of cutoffs, NfL is more specific than it is sensitive. The meta‐analysis demonstrated a roughly 2‐fold increase in NfL levels in dementia patients from cognitively healthy controls (1.84‐fold change plasma, 2.77‐fold change serum). Conclusion In the setting of memory care, NfL is likely to be most useful in detecting early dementia in patients presenting with subjective or mild cognitive impairment. As baseline NfL levels significantly change across a person’s lifetime, all NfL levels should be compared to population normals during their interpretation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.083772
Primary Topic
Social and Behavioral Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Meta‐Analysis & Review of Blood Neurofilament Light Performance in Diagnosis of All‐Cause Dementia

Remington E. Schmidt, Yogesh Shah
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Social and Behavioral Studies
article

Meta‐Analysis & Review of Blood Neurofilament Light Performance in Diagnosis of All‐Cause Dementia

Remington E. Schmidt, Yogesh Shah
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background NfL is a non‐specific biomarker that elevates in the presence of axonal damage. In the blood, it has recently been explored as a potential test in evaluating the presence or absence of dementia. Method A systematic review and meta‐analysis of 58 studies examining plasma or serum NfL levels as measured on a single molecule array (SIMOA) platform was used to determine the discriminatory capacity of using NfL to distinguish between healthy controls and patients with dementia. Result NfL provides reasonable discriminatory capacity between healthy controls and patients with all‐cause dementia (serum AUC=0.85, plasma AUC=0.75). For a reasonable range of cutoffs, NfL is more specific than it is sensitive. The meta‐analysis demonstrated a roughly 2‐fold increase in NfL levels in dementia patients from cognitively healthy controls (1.84‐fold change plasma, 2.77‐fold change serum). Conclusion In the setting of memory care, NfL is likely to be most useful in detecting early dementia in patients presenting with subjective or mild cognitive impairment. As baseline NfL levels significantly change across a person’s lifetime, all NfL levels should be compared to population normals during their interpretation.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S2)
Broadlawns Medical Center (US), Des Moines University (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Social and Behavioral Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Meta‐Analysis & Review of Blood Neurofilament Light Performance in Diagnosis of All‐Cause Dementia — Remington E. Schmidt, Yogesh Shah · Alzheimer s & Dementia (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS