Cerebrospinal fluid proteomics identifies biomarkers for discriminating amyloid PET and tau PET stages

Abstract Background Staging Alzheimer's disease pathology is critical for therapeutic trials and prognosis. Disease staging with amyloid and tau PET provides high accuracy, but this would be more practical with fluid biomarkers. However, current fluid biomarkers are deficient in tracking specific disease stages, especially in advanced stages. Method Participants (N=115) were enrolled from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative who had available CSF proteomics and amyloid and tau PET. The proteomic analysis involved approximately 6000 unique CSF proteins measured by SomaScan 7K. A least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression combined with machine learning approach was employed to develop proteomic predictive models for amyloid PET and tau PET stages. Finally, we compared the model's performance with established CSF Alzheimer's biomarkers (amyloid‐β [Aβ]42, phosphorylated tau [p‐tau]181, and total tau [t‐tau]). Result We identified 38 proteins associated with amyloid PET and 128 proteins with tau PET in the amyloid PET‐positive participants. These proteins are primarily related to glucose metabolism and neurotrophic function. Through machine learning, 17 proteins were selected for the panel to differentiate amyloid and tau PET stages. Of these, 9 proteins were specific for distinguishing between amyloid PET‐negative and tau PET‐negative (A‐T‐) and amyloid PET‐positive and tau PET‐positive (A+T‐) (e.g., SMOC1, NEFH), 4 for discriminating A+T‐ and amyloid PET‐positive and tau PET‐positive in the temporal neocortex (A+TNEO+) (e.g., TMOD2, CRNN), with 4 common to both categories (e.g., MMP10, PPIB). We found that a maximum of 8 and a minimum of 2 proteins effectively differentiated A+TNEO+ from A+T‐ (area under curve range: 0.9‐1), and a maximum of 13 and a minimum of 4 proteins discriminated A+T‐ from A‐T‐ (area under curve range: 0.82‐0.92) (Figure 1). The discriminative performance of these protein panels was significantly superior to the established CSF Alzheimer's biomarkers, with or without the addition of risk factors in the models (Figure 2), which we validated using autopsy data. Conclusion In conclusion, assessing a limited set of proteins can accurately determine distinct pathological stages of Alzheimer's disease, addressing the limitations of current fluid biomarkers in identifying specific disease stages.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.085720
Primary Topic
Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cerebrospinal fluid proteomics identifies biomarkers for discriminating amyloid PET and tau PET stages

Yuhan Chen, Zhibo Wang, Jianping Jia
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
article

Cerebrospinal fluid proteomics identifies biomarkers for discriminating amyloid PET and tau PET stages

Yuhan Chen, Zhibo Wang, Jianping Jia
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Staging Alzheimer's disease pathology is critical for therapeutic trials and prognosis. Disease staging with amyloid and tau PET provides high accuracy, but this would be more practical with fluid biomarkers. However, current fluid biomarkers are deficient in tracking specific disease stages, especially in advanced stages. Method Participants (N=115) were enrolled from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative who had available CSF proteomics and amyloid and tau PET. The proteomic analysis involved approximately 6000 unique CSF proteins measured by SomaScan 7K. A least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression combined with machine learning approach was employed to develop proteomic predictive models for amyloid PET and tau PET stages. Finally, we compared the model's performance with established CSF Alzheimer's biomarkers (amyloid‐β [Aβ]42, phosphorylated tau [p‐tau]181, and total tau [t‐tau]). Result We identified 38 proteins associated with amyloid PET and 128 proteins with tau PET in the amyloid PET‐positive participants. These proteins are primarily related to glucose metabolism and neurotrophic function. Through machine learning, 17 proteins were selected for the panel to differentiate amyloid and tau PET stages. Of these, 9 proteins were specific for distinguishing between amyloid PET‐negative and tau PET‐negative (A‐T‐) and amyloid PET‐positive and tau PET‐positive (A+T‐) (e.g., SMOC1, NEFH), 4 for discriminating A+T‐ and amyloid PET‐positive and tau PET‐positive in the temporal neocortex (A+TNEO+) (e.g., TMOD2, CRNN), with 4 common to both categories (e.g., MMP10, PPIB). We found that a maximum of 8 and a minimum of 2 proteins effectively differentiated A+TNEO+ from A+T‐ (area under curve range: 0.9‐1), and a maximum of 13 and a minimum of 4 proteins discriminated A+T‐ from A‐T‐ (area under curve range: 0.82‐0.92) (Figure 1). The discriminative performance of these protein panels was significantly superior to the established CSF Alzheimer's biomarkers, with or without the addition of risk factors in the models (Figure 2), which we validated using autopsy data. Conclusion In conclusion, assessing a limited set of proteins can accurately determine distinct pathological stages of Alzheimer's disease, addressing the limitations of current fluid biomarkers in identifying specific disease stages.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S2)
Hebei North University (CN), Capital Medical University (CN)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.