Anesthetic dose‐adjusted intraoperative alpha power in association with biomarkers of preclinical Alzheimer’s disease, preoperative attention function, and postoperative delirium
Abstract Background Postoperative delirium (POD) is characterized by fluctuating attention after surgery and is associated with increased risk of developing Alzheimer’s Disease (AD). While the neurophysiological changes that underlie POD and increased risk of AD are unclear, recent data has raised the possibility that an exaggerated brain response to anesthetics may be a biomarker for POD risk and preclinical AD‐like pathology. Thus, we examined whether anesthetic‐dose‐adjusted intraoperative brain activity is associated with POD or preoperative brain vulnerabilities (preclinical AD‐like pathology, preoperative inattention) that may contribute to risk of POD (and later AD). Method 82 patients from 3 prospective cohort studies of non‐cardiac, non‐neurologic surgical patients age ≥60 who had sufficient 32‐channel intraoperative electroencephalographic (EEG) data and received a gas anesthetic for ≥80% of their surgery were included. Other data included preoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples, preoperative cognitive testing, and delirium scores (before surgery and twice daily for ≤5 days after surgery). Univariable associations were evaluated between 8‐12Hz anesthetic‐dose‐adjusted frontoparietal EEG alpha power and 1) preoperative CSF AD biomarkers (pTau181p, Aβ42, pTau181p/Aβ42), 2) preoperative attention function, and 3) POD incidence and severity. To account for the brain’s response to anesthetics, alpha power was dose‐adjusted as follows: (alpha power at each minute of surgery) / (2.5 – age‐adjusted minimum alveolar concentration at each minute of surgery) and summarized by patient across minutes as the mean of median‐filtered alpha. Result Lower dose‐adjusted intraoperative frontoparietal alpha power was found among patients 1) with (vs. without) preoperative pTau/Aβ pathology (Table 1), and 2) among those who scored worse on timed preoperative attention tasks (Table 2). Low dose‐adjusted alpha power was also associated with increased odds of POD and moderate‐to‐severe delirium symptomology (Table 3). The conclusions were similar for unadjusted alpha power, though only dose‐adjusted values were associated with POD severity. Overall, the results suggest that, regardless of our anesthetic‐dose‐adjustment, low intraoperative frontoparietal alpha power is associated with CSF pTau/Aβ pathology, attention function, and POD. Conclusion Future studies are needed to determine whether there are causal pathways between preoperative brain vulnerabilities, intraoperative frontoparietal alpha power, and POD. Understanding these pathways will improve our ability to identify at‐risk patients for targeted interventions.
Authors
- Jeffrey N. Browndyke (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8573-7073)
- Melody Reese (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8288-7914)
- Mary Cooter (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0282-552X)
- Teresa Waligórska
- Kaj Blennow (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1890-4193)
- Kenneth Roberts (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8033-0864)
- Miles Berger (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2386-5061)
- Leslie M. Shaw (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7650-1210)
- Henrik Zetterberg
- Marty G. Woldorff
Institutions
- Duke University (US)
- Profu (Sweden) (SE)
- Institute for Neurodegenerative Disorders (US)
- Duke Medical Center (US)
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- University of Gothenburg (SE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Alzheimer s & Dementia
- Published
- 2024-12-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.089088
- Primary Topic
- Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00