Patterns of Tau Deposition by Cognitive Subtype in the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative

Abstract Background Cognitive subtypes of Alzheimer’s Dementia (AD), defined by a relative impairment in a particular domain of cognition, have previously been shown to be associated with patterns of gray matter atrophy. Here we assessed the association of these subtypes with patterns of tau deposition measured in vivo using tau PET imaging in the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI). Method We included amyloid positive individuals with AD and Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI). We selected the first diagnosis visit for AD and the most recent visit for MCI. Previously, AD individuals were categorized into AD‐Memory, AD‐Language, AD‐Executive, AD‐Visuospatial, AD‐Multiple domains, or AD‐No domain subtypes based on a relative cognitive impairment. These methods were extended to categorize MCI individuals. The AD/MCI‐Memory, AD/MCI‐Visuospatial, and AD/MCI‐No domain groups were large enough for our analyses. The tau PET scan closest to the subtyping visit was selected (median 49 days between scan and visit). Tau deposition for 35 brain regions (left and right sides averaged) were included as predictors. Separate five‐fold cross validated LASSO regressions were run for each of the three pairwise comparisons. Each model was repeated 100 times with different random fold selections to assess the stability of results. Result We included 240 individuals (118 AD; 122 MCI) in our analyses (Table 1). There was some variation in the chosen models across repetitions with the AD/MCI‐Visuospatial versus AD/MCI‐No domain comparison varying the most (Table 2). We limit interpretation to those regions that appeared in ≥70% of repetitions. The amygdala was consistently selected in all pair‐wise comparisons. Higher tau deposition in this region was associated with a higher likelihood of being in AD/MCI‐Memory. Higher tau deposition in the postcentral region was associated with a lower likelihood of being in AD/MCI‐Memory compared to AD/MCI‐Visuospatial. Coefficients on consistently selected regions in the AD/MCI‐visuospatial versus AD/MCI‐No domain comparison were small. Figure 1 summarizes the top results from our analyses. Conclusion We found heterogeneity in regional tau deposition among three cognitive subtypes. Future work will make use of additional cohorts with harmonized cognitive and imaging data. We plan to incorporate all cognitive subtypes and evaluate lateral asymmetry.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.093195
Primary Topic
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patterns of Tau Deposition by Cognitive Subtype in the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative

Elizabeth A. Sanders, Shannon L. Risacher, Michael L. Lee, Emily H. Trittschuh et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
article

Patterns of Tau Deposition by Cognitive Subtype in the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative

Elizabeth A. Sanders, Shannon L. Risacher, Michael L. Lee, Emily H. Trittschuh, Andrew J. Saykin, Laura E. Gibbons, Paul K. Crane, Mackenzie Carlson, Shubhabrata Mukherjee, Connie Nakano, Brandon S. Klinedinst, Phoebe Scollard, Elizabeth C. Mormino, Christina B. Young, Eardi Lila, Jesse Mez, Viktorija Smith, Seo‐Eun Choi
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Cognitive subtypes of Alzheimer’s Dementia (AD), defined by a relative impairment in a particular domain of cognition, have previously been shown to be associated with patterns of gray matter atrophy. Here we assessed the association of these subtypes with patterns of tau deposition measured in vivo using tau PET imaging in the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI). Method We included amyloid positive individuals with AD and Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI). We selected the first diagnosis visit for AD and the most recent visit for MCI. Previously, AD individuals were categorized into AD‐Memory, AD‐Language, AD‐Executive, AD‐Visuospatial, AD‐Multiple domains, or AD‐No domain subtypes based on a relative cognitive impairment. These methods were extended to categorize MCI individuals. The AD/MCI‐Memory, AD/MCI‐Visuospatial, and AD/MCI‐No domain groups were large enough for our analyses. The tau PET scan closest to the subtyping visit was selected (median 49 days between scan and visit). Tau deposition for 35 brain regions (left and right sides averaged) were included as predictors. Separate five‐fold cross validated LASSO regressions were run for each of the three pairwise comparisons. Each model was repeated 100 times with different random fold selections to assess the stability of results. Result We included 240 individuals (118 AD; 122 MCI) in our analyses (Table 1). There was some variation in the chosen models across repetitions with the AD/MCI‐Visuospatial versus AD/MCI‐No domain comparison varying the most (Table 2). We limit interpretation to those regions that appeared in ≥70% of repetitions. The amygdala was consistently selected in all pair‐wise comparisons. Higher tau deposition in this region was associated with a higher likelihood of being in AD/MCI‐Memory. Higher tau deposition in the postcentral region was associated with a lower likelihood of being in AD/MCI‐Memory compared to AD/MCI‐Visuospatial. Coefficients on consistently selected regions in the AD/MCI‐visuospatial versus AD/MCI‐No domain comparison were small. Figure 1 summarizes the top results from our analyses. Conclusion We found heterogeneity in regional tau deposition among three cognitive subtypes. Future work will make use of additional cohorts with harmonized cognitive and imaging data. We plan to incorporate all cognitive subtypes and evaluate lateral asymmetry.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S2)
Boston University (US), University of Puget Sound (US), Palo Alto University (US), University of Washington (US), Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center (US), Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US), Stanford University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.