Analyzing Sleep and Gait Dynamics through Digital Monitoring across Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) and non‐MCI Groups

Abstract Background Sleep apnea and insomnia are risk factors for dementia. Slower gait and increased gait variability are also associated with increased risk of MCI, linked to cognitive decline. Wearable digital sensors can serve as vital tools for measuring sleep and motor function. While poor quality of sleep has been correlated with decline in cognitive function, the relationship between sleep quality and gait parameters is less characterized. We hypothesized sleep apnea and lower sleep quality were associated with gait speed, gait variability, and functional mobility. Method Participants aged 50+ (n=55, female=31) used a finger‐worn sensor with embedded plethysmography [Sleepimage] for at least three consecutive nights over two weeks, quarterly for eight quarters. Five major sleep parameters were evaluated: Sleep Quality Index (SQI), sleep efficiency, Apnea Hypopnea Index (sAHI) at 3% oxygen desaturation threshold, sleep latency, and stable non‐REM sleep percentage. Gait assessments were completed on‐site with inertial sensors [APDM Opals] worn on the wrists, shanks, and waist. It included timed walks with and without cognitive tasks and a Timed Up and Go (TUG) test. Relevant parameters included comfortable gait velocity, dual‐task walking velocity, and lateral step variability. Pearson correlations were used to assess the relationship between sleep and gait parameters. Mean values were compared between participants with and without MCI (MCI=8, Non‐MCI=47) and between slow and fast walkers (above or below 1 meters/second, fast, n=29, slow, n=26) using independent t‐tests. Result Mean sAHI was significantly greater in slow (22.39) than fast walkers (14.57, t=2.309, p=0.026). sAHI demonstrated a significant negative correlation with gait velocity (r=‐0.288, p=0.047) and a positive correlation with time required to stand from sitting (r=0.367, p=0.01). Better SQI (r=‐0.316, p=0.029), longer sleep latency (r=0.296, p=0.041), and stable non‐REM sleep (r=‐0.316, p=0.029) was significantly associated with increased lateral step variability. Mean lateral step variability was higher in participants with MCI (16.89) than those without (0.68, t=2.485, p=0.036); mean TUG time was longer in participants with MCI (12.21 seconds) than those without (9.85, t=‐2.755, p=0.028). Conclusion This preliminary analysis suggests associations between sleep disturbances and gait parameters associated with risk of cognitive decline. Constraints of sample size and participant diversity are acknowledged, informing the ongoing enrollment of the cohort.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.086673
Primary Topic
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analyzing Sleep and Gait Dynamics through Digital Monitoring across Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) and non‐MCI Groups

Preeti Sunderaraman, Minzae Kim, Spencer Low, Ludy C. Shih et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
article

Analyzing Sleep and Gait Dynamics through Digital Monitoring across Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) and non‐MCI Groups

Preeti Sunderaraman, Minzae Kim, Spencer Low, Ludy C. Shih, Rhoda Au
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Sleep apnea and insomnia are risk factors for dementia. Slower gait and increased gait variability are also associated with increased risk of MCI, linked to cognitive decline. Wearable digital sensors can serve as vital tools for measuring sleep and motor function. While poor quality of sleep has been correlated with decline in cognitive function, the relationship between sleep quality and gait parameters is less characterized. We hypothesized sleep apnea and lower sleep quality were associated with gait speed, gait variability, and functional mobility. Method Participants aged 50+ (n=55, female=31) used a finger‐worn sensor with embedded plethysmography [Sleepimage] for at least three consecutive nights over two weeks, quarterly for eight quarters. Five major sleep parameters were evaluated: Sleep Quality Index (SQI), sleep efficiency, Apnea Hypopnea Index (sAHI) at 3% oxygen desaturation threshold, sleep latency, and stable non‐REM sleep percentage. Gait assessments were completed on‐site with inertial sensors [APDM Opals] worn on the wrists, shanks, and waist. It included timed walks with and without cognitive tasks and a Timed Up and Go (TUG) test. Relevant parameters included comfortable gait velocity, dual‐task walking velocity, and lateral step variability. Pearson correlations were used to assess the relationship between sleep and gait parameters. Mean values were compared between participants with and without MCI (MCI=8, Non‐MCI=47) and between slow and fast walkers (above or below 1 meters/second, fast, n=29, slow, n=26) using independent t‐tests. Result Mean sAHI was significantly greater in slow (22.39) than fast walkers (14.57, t=2.309, p=0.026). sAHI demonstrated a significant negative correlation with gait velocity (r=‐0.288, p=0.047) and a positive correlation with time required to stand from sitting (r=0.367, p=0.01). Better SQI (r=‐0.316, p=0.029), longer sleep latency (r=0.296, p=0.041), and stable non‐REM sleep (r=‐0.316, p=0.029) was significantly associated with increased lateral step variability. Mean lateral step variability was higher in participants with MCI (16.89) than those without (0.68, t=2.485, p=0.036); mean TUG time was longer in participants with MCI (12.21 seconds) than those without (9.85, t=‐2.755, p=0.028). Conclusion This preliminary analysis suggests associations between sleep disturbances and gait parameters associated with risk of cognitive decline. Constraints of sample size and participant diversity are acknowledged, informing the ongoing enrollment of the cohort.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S2)
Boston University (US), Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (US), Framingham Heart Study (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.