Diagnostic Utility of Plasma Biomarkers to Differentiate Controls, SCD, and MCI Subjects

Abstract Background Plasma biomarkers of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) are less invasive and have lower costs than cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers. Blood biomarkers are potential instruments for diagnosis, prognosis, and monitoring of disease progression. We assessed the diagnostic potential of several plasma biomarkers for the detection of early stages of AD. Method 152 participants (age>60) were recruited at the NYU Alzheimer's Disease Research Center. This cohort includes n=55 with normal cognition (NL), n=70 with subject cognitive decline (SCD), and n=27 with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Comprehensive neuropsychological and magnetic resonance imaging evaluations were conducted for all patients. Plasma biomarkers assay Aβ40, Aβ42, total tau [t‐tau], neurofilament light [NfL], glial fibrillary acid protein [GFAP], ubiquitin carboxyl‐terminal hydrolase L1 [UCH‐L1], and pTau181 were measured using the SIMOA SR‐X a novel technology that employs highly sensitive immunoassays with a limit of detection (LOD) under 100 fg/ml. Result The levels of Aβ40, Aβ42, and t‐tau were measured using the Neurology 3‐plex A. Aβ42 levels showed a significant difference between NL and MCI (one‐tailed t‐test p=0.0262). The level of Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio was also significantly different between SCD and MCI (one‐tailed t‐test p=0.0206). pTau181 level showed a statistically significant difference between NL and SCD (one‐tailed t‐test p=0.0341). The pTau181/Aβ42 ratio was significantly different between NL and SCD; and NL and MCI (one‐tailed t‐test p=0.0190 and p=0.0037, respectively). In addition, the t‐tau/Aβ42 ratio was significantly different between NL and SCD, and NL and MCI (p=0.0359 and p=0.0091, respectively). Correlation of these biomarkers with brain imaging and cognitive measures is underway. Conclusion Biomarker levels of Aβ42, pTau181, pTau181/ Aβ42 ratio, and t‐tau/Aβ42 in plasma samples showed significant differences between the three groups of subjects. Plasma biomarkers can be useful for the diagnosis of AD‐related pathology at early stages.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.089935
Primary Topic
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diagnostic Utility of Plasma Biomarkers to Differentiate Controls, SCD, and MCI Subjects

Arjun V. Masurkar, Ricardo S. Osorio, Alok Vedvyas, Karyn Marsh et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
article

Diagnostic Utility of Plasma Biomarkers to Differentiate Controls, SCD, and MCI Subjects

Arjun V. Masurkar, Ricardo S. Osorio, Alok Vedvyas, Karyn Marsh, Ludovic Debure, Wajiha Ahmed, Thomas Wisniewski, Jon Links, Allal Boutajangout
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Plasma biomarkers of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) are less invasive and have lower costs than cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers. Blood biomarkers are potential instruments for diagnosis, prognosis, and monitoring of disease progression. We assessed the diagnostic potential of several plasma biomarkers for the detection of early stages of AD. Method 152 participants (age>60) were recruited at the NYU Alzheimer's Disease Research Center. This cohort includes n=55 with normal cognition (NL), n=70 with subject cognitive decline (SCD), and n=27 with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Comprehensive neuropsychological and magnetic resonance imaging evaluations were conducted for all patients. Plasma biomarkers assay Aβ40, Aβ42, total tau [t‐tau], neurofilament light [NfL], glial fibrillary acid protein [GFAP], ubiquitin carboxyl‐terminal hydrolase L1 [UCH‐L1], and pTau181 were measured using the SIMOA SR‐X a novel technology that employs highly sensitive immunoassays with a limit of detection (LOD) under 100 fg/ml. Result The levels of Aβ40, Aβ42, and t‐tau were measured using the Neurology 3‐plex A. Aβ42 levels showed a significant difference between NL and MCI (one‐tailed t‐test p=0.0262). The level of Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio was also significantly different between SCD and MCI (one‐tailed t‐test p=0.0206). pTau181 level showed a statistically significant difference between NL and SCD (one‐tailed t‐test p=0.0341). The pTau181/Aβ42 ratio was significantly different between NL and SCD; and NL and MCI (one‐tailed t‐test p=0.0190 and p=0.0037, respectively). In addition, the t‐tau/Aβ42 ratio was significantly different between NL and SCD, and NL and MCI (p=0.0359 and p=0.0091, respectively). Correlation of these biomarkers with brain imaging and cognitive measures is underway. Conclusion Biomarker levels of Aβ42, pTau181, pTau181/ Aβ42 ratio, and t‐tau/Aβ42 in plasma samples showed significant differences between the three groups of subjects. Plasma biomarkers can be useful for the diagnosis of AD‐related pathology at early stages.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S2)
NYU Langone Health (US), New York University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.