Consistent Explainable features for Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment through Handwriting

Abstract Background Motoric changes are one of the earlier changes in neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease (AD), but they are often difficult to detect especially in the early stages. In the past, examination of handwriting has been used to investigate motoric changes as a proxy for cognitive impairment. In this study, we explore a wide array of explainable features from the handwriting of patients, obtained using signal processing, and their impact on assessment of AD and Mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Method We collected data from 69 participants, 25 with AD or MCI, and 44 for the control group (CTL) on a digital tablet. We analyzed 13 different tasks, categorized into 4 groups: Point tasks (maintaining the pen still, close to the tablet), Spiral tasks (drawing spirals), Writing tasks (paragraphs from different stimuli), and Drawing tasks (drawing various images). Note that not all the participants succeeded to finish all the tasks. From the drawings of each subject were computed multiple characteristics: derivates of the positions, pressions and angles, then we used multiple statistics to get 367 global explainable features. Those features were compared to obtain the ones providing consistently the most significant differences between the two studied groups using Welch's t‐test, with false discovery rate (FDR) correction. We checked their consistency by comparing which ones were significant across all the tasks of a certain group. Result Our results showed that out of the 367 features extracted, 189 features were significantly different between AD/MCI and the control group after FDR‐correction (p‐value<0.05), and 52 were statistically significant for all the tasks of at least one group of tasks. Most of the significant features were directly related to the velocity with which participants executed the various tasks (average speed, angular speed, variations of the speed on tablet, etc.), and related to the non‐effective movements, measured by the entropies. Conclusion The analysis of a large variety of handwriting segments employing machine learning techniques can provide an assessment of patients with AD and MCI that may be useful in their early diagnosis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.092906
Primary Topic
Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Consistent Explainable features for Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment through Handwriting

Esther S. Oh, Thomas Thebaud, Najim Dehak, Laureano Moro-Velázquez
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
article

Consistent Explainable features for Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment through Handwriting

Esther S. Oh, Thomas Thebaud, Najim Dehak, Laureano Moro-Velázquez
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Motoric changes are one of the earlier changes in neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease (AD), but they are often difficult to detect especially in the early stages. In the past, examination of handwriting has been used to investigate motoric changes as a proxy for cognitive impairment. In this study, we explore a wide array of explainable features from the handwriting of patients, obtained using signal processing, and their impact on assessment of AD and Mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Method We collected data from 69 participants, 25 with AD or MCI, and 44 for the control group (CTL) on a digital tablet. We analyzed 13 different tasks, categorized into 4 groups: Point tasks (maintaining the pen still, close to the tablet), Spiral tasks (drawing spirals), Writing tasks (paragraphs from different stimuli), and Drawing tasks (drawing various images). Note that not all the participants succeeded to finish all the tasks. From the drawings of each subject were computed multiple characteristics: derivates of the positions, pressions and angles, then we used multiple statistics to get 367 global explainable features. Those features were compared to obtain the ones providing consistently the most significant differences between the two studied groups using Welch's t‐test, with false discovery rate (FDR) correction. We checked their consistency by comparing which ones were significant across all the tasks of a certain group. Result Our results showed that out of the 367 features extracted, 189 features were significantly different between AD/MCI and the control group after FDR‐correction (p‐value<0.05), and 52 were statistically significant for all the tasks of at least one group of tasks. Most of the significant features were directly related to the velocity with which participants executed the various tasks (average speed, angular speed, variations of the speed on tablet, etc.), and related to the non‐effective movements, measured by the entropies. Conclusion The analysis of a large variety of handwriting segments employing machine learning techniques can provide an assessment of patients with AD and MCI that may be useful in their early diagnosis.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S2)
Johns Hopkins University (US), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.