Prognostic value of neuroinflammation [<sup>11</sup>C]PK11195 PET on longitudinal cognitive decline and survival up to 15 years after PET in Alzheimer's disease

Abstract Background Neuroinflammation plays a key role in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) pathophysiology. However, whether neuroinflammation has a prognostic effect on disease progression is largely unknown. Therefore, we aim to investigate the role of neuroinflammation as measured using PET on longitudinal cognition and survival. Method We included 29 amyloid‐positive participants (N=10 MCI, N=19 AD dementia) from a historical cohort who underwent dynamic [ 11 C]PK11195 (TSPO) PET to quantify neuroinflammation (Table 1). [ 11 C]PK11195 BP ND was obtained using supervised cluster analysis and quantified in the parietal and temporal cortex. [ 11 C]PK11195 BP ND values were z‐scored to young healthy controls (N=12). Longitudinal MMSE covering a period up to 11 years was used to measure cognitive decline (median: 3.9, range: 0.3‐11.6 years). We used linear mixed models with random intercept and slope corrected for age, sex and education to investigate the effect of neuroinflammation on cognition. Survival data were available for all participants, up to 15.7 years after PET. To examine the influence of neuroinflammation on survival time, we used age, sex, and diagnosis adjusted cox proportional‐hazards models for both regions. Result Demographic characteristics and mean [ 11 C]PK11195 BP ND can be found in table 1. Overall, the group showed a mean annualized decline of ‐1.86±1.42 points on MMSE and had a median survival time of 7.6 years (range: 0.4‐15.7) after PET. Temporal or parietal [ 11 C]PK11195 BP ND did not predict longitudinal MMSE (parietal: β=0.15, p=0.438; temporal: β=‐0.11, p=0.660) (Figure 1). Higher parietal [ 11 C]PK11195 BP ND was marginally associated with shorter survival (HR = ‐0.39, P=0.043) (Figure 2A). There was no significant difference in survival time with higher temporal [ 11 C]PK11195 BP ND (HR= ‐0.42, P=0.053) (Figure 2B). Conclusion In this initial set of analyses covering up to 11 years of cognitive follow‐up and survival information of 15 years after PET, we found preliminary evidence of a shorter survival with increasing parietal neuroinflammation, but no associations between neuroinflammation PET and the rate of cognitive decline. Future research could explore the effect of neuroinflammation PET on more specific cognitive domains and biological measures such as cortical thickness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.087326
Primary Topic
Tryptophan and brain disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prognostic value of neuroinflammation [11C]PK11195 PET on longitudinal cognitive decline and survival up to 15 years after PET in Alzheimer's disease

Albert D. Windhorst, Roos M. Rikken, Ronald Boellaard, Wiesje M. van der Flier et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Tryptophan and brain disorders
article

Prognostic value of neuroinflammation [11C]PK11195 PET on longitudinal cognitive decline and survival up to 15 years after PET in Alzheimer's disease

Albert D. Windhorst, Roos M. Rikken, Ronald Boellaard, Wiesje M. van der Flier, Emma M. Coomans, Elsmarieke van de Giessen, Frederik Barkhof, Annelies E. van der Vlies, Everard G.B. Vijverberg, Yolande A.L. Pijnenburg, Maqsood Yaqub
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Neuroinflammation plays a key role in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) pathophysiology. However, whether neuroinflammation has a prognostic effect on disease progression is largely unknown. Therefore, we aim to investigate the role of neuroinflammation as measured using PET on longitudinal cognition and survival. Method We included 29 amyloid‐positive participants (N=10 MCI, N=19 AD dementia) from a historical cohort who underwent dynamic [ 11 C]PK11195 (TSPO) PET to quantify neuroinflammation (Table 1). [ 11 C]PK11195 BP ND was obtained using supervised cluster analysis and quantified in the parietal and temporal cortex. [ 11 C]PK11195 BP ND values were z‐scored to young healthy controls (N=12). Longitudinal MMSE covering a period up to 11 years was used to measure cognitive decline (median: 3.9, range: 0.3‐11.6 years). We used linear mixed models with random intercept and slope corrected for age, sex and education to investigate the effect of neuroinflammation on cognition. Survival data were available for all participants, up to 15.7 years after PET. To examine the influence of neuroinflammation on survival time, we used age, sex, and diagnosis adjusted cox proportional‐hazards models for both regions. Result Demographic characteristics and mean [ 11 C]PK11195 BP ND can be found in table 1. Overall, the group showed a mean annualized decline of ‐1.86±1.42 points on MMSE and had a median survival time of 7.6 years (range: 0.4‐15.7) after PET. Temporal or parietal [ 11 C]PK11195 BP ND did not predict longitudinal MMSE (parietal: β=0.15, p=0.438; temporal: β=‐0.11, p=0.660) (Figure 1). Higher parietal [ 11 C]PK11195 BP ND was marginally associated with shorter survival (HR = ‐0.39, P=0.043) (Figure 2A). There was no significant difference in survival time with higher temporal [ 11 C]PK11195 BP ND (HR= ‐0.42, P=0.053) (Figure 2B). Conclusion In this initial set of analyses covering up to 11 years of cognitive follow‐up and survival information of 15 years after PET, we found preliminary evidence of a shorter survival with increasing parietal neuroinflammation, but no associations between neuroinflammation PET and the rate of cognitive decline. Future research could explore the effect of neuroinflammation PET on more specific cognitive domains and biological measures such as cortical thickness.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S2)
Amsterdam Neuroscience (NL), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), University College London (GB), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Tryptophan and brain disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.