Associations between blood‐based biomarkers, synaptic density and Alzheimer’s disease hallmarks in the brains of nondemented elderly

Abstract Background Synaptic loss is a critical early pathological hallmark of neurodegeneration, in particular in Alzheimer’s disease (AD), as evidenced by in vitro as well as in vivo PET studies. To date, it is not clear how blood‐based synaptic and AD biomarkers relate to synaptic density in the brains of non‐demented elderly, including those diagnosed with depression. Method This cross‐sectional study included 61 older adults with no history of dementia (age [mean±SD] = 71±6 years, MMSE (median[IQR] = 28[3], 64% female, 38% late‐life depression) from the Leuven late‐life depression (L3D) study. Plasma as well as [ 11 C]UCB‐J PET (synaptic vesicle protein 2A [SV2A]) were acquired from all participants. Subgroups underwent [ 18 F]MK6240 (tau load, n = 51) and [ 18 F]flutemetamol (amyloid‐β [Aβ] load, n = 48) PET. Plasma SNAP25, VAMP2 and pTau181 were quantified using Homebrew Simoa assays developed by ADx Neurosciences. Plasma GFAP, Aβ 1‐42 and Aβ 1‐40 were quantified using the Quanterix N4PE Simoa kit. Associations between biomarkers and SV2A density were evaluated using voxelwise regression models adjusted for age, sex and depression diagnosis at peak‐level P uncorrected <.05 and cluster‐level P FWE <.05. If significant clusters were detected, Spearman correlations were calculated across the identified clusters for each biomarker. Global brain Aβ and tau load were assessed in Aβ‐ and tau‐vulnerable regions and also correlated with plasma biomarkers. Result High GFAP levels associated with low synaptic density within temporal regions (GFAP cluster 1) as well as the precuneus and cingulate gyrus (GFAP cluster 2) with ρ GFAP = ‐0.39 (P =.002, Figure 1A). High VAMP2 levels were associated with lower synaptic density within temporal and frontal and – to a lesser extent – occipital regions (ρ VAMP2 = ‐0.55, P <.001, Figure 1B). For the Aβ 1‐42 /Aβ 1‐40 ratio as well as pTau181 and SNAP25 levels, no associations with synaptic density were observed. Of note, study participants overall demonstrated low global Aβ and tau pathology (Figure 2) and no correlations were found with global Aβ nor tau load for any of the plasma biomarkers. Conclusion Plasma levels of GFAP and VAMP2 reflect synaptic density independently of pathological AD hallmarks in nondemented elderly with low evidence of AD pathology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.090738
Primary Topic
Neurological Disorders and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Associations between blood‐based biomarkers, synaptic density and Alzheimer’s disease hallmarks in the brains of nondemented elderly

Koen Poesen, Patrick Dupont, Louise Emsell, Margot Van Cauwenberge et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Neurological Disorders and Treatments
article

Associations between blood‐based biomarkers, synaptic density and Alzheimer’s disease hallmarks in the brains of nondemented elderly

Koen Poesen, Patrick Dupont, Louise Emsell, Margot Van Cauwenberge, Julie Goossens, Jeroen Vanbrabant, Maarten Laroy, Mathieu Vandenbulcke, Eugeen Vanmechelen, Koen Van Laere, Thomas Vande Casteele, Charlotte De Rocker, Steffi De Meyer, Soha Alali
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Synaptic loss is a critical early pathological hallmark of neurodegeneration, in particular in Alzheimer’s disease (AD), as evidenced by in vitro as well as in vivo PET studies. To date, it is not clear how blood‐based synaptic and AD biomarkers relate to synaptic density in the brains of non‐demented elderly, including those diagnosed with depression. Method This cross‐sectional study included 61 older adults with no history of dementia (age [mean±SD] = 71±6 years, MMSE (median[IQR] = 28[3], 64% female, 38% late‐life depression) from the Leuven late‐life depression (L3D) study. Plasma as well as [ 11 C]UCB‐J PET (synaptic vesicle protein 2A [SV2A]) were acquired from all participants. Subgroups underwent [ 18 F]MK6240 (tau load, n = 51) and [ 18 F]flutemetamol (amyloid‐β [Aβ] load, n = 48) PET. Plasma SNAP25, VAMP2 and pTau181 were quantified using Homebrew Simoa assays developed by ADx Neurosciences. Plasma GFAP, Aβ 1‐42 and Aβ 1‐40 were quantified using the Quanterix N4PE Simoa kit. Associations between biomarkers and SV2A density were evaluated using voxelwise regression models adjusted for age, sex and depression diagnosis at peak‐level P uncorrected <.05 and cluster‐level P FWE <.05. If significant clusters were detected, Spearman correlations were calculated across the identified clusters for each biomarker. Global brain Aβ and tau load were assessed in Aβ‐ and tau‐vulnerable regions and also correlated with plasma biomarkers. Result High GFAP levels associated with low synaptic density within temporal regions (GFAP cluster 1) as well as the precuneus and cingulate gyrus (GFAP cluster 2) with ρ GFAP = ‐0.39 (P =.002, Figure 1A). High VAMP2 levels were associated with lower synaptic density within temporal and frontal and – to a lesser extent – occipital regions (ρ VAMP2 = ‐0.55, P <.001, Figure 1B). For the Aβ 1‐42 /Aβ 1‐40 ratio as well as pTau181 and SNAP25 levels, no associations with synaptic density were observed. Of note, study participants overall demonstrated low global Aβ and tau pathology (Figure 2) and no correlations were found with global Aβ nor tau load for any of the plasma biomarkers. Conclusion Plasma levels of GFAP and VAMP2 reflect synaptic density independently of pathological AD hallmarks in nondemented elderly with low evidence of AD pathology.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S2)
Ablynx (Belgium) (BE), VIB-KU Leuven Center for Brain & Disease Research (BE), ADx NeuroSciences, KU Leuven (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Neurological Disorders and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.