UD-LDP: A Technique for optimally catalyzing user driven Local Differential Privacy

Local Differential Privacy (LDP) has emerged as a popular mechanism for crowd-sourced data collection, but enforcing a uniform level of perturbation may hinder the participation of individuals with higher privacy needs, while high privacy levels that satisfy more users can reduce utility. To address this, we propose a cohort-based mechanism that allows participants to choose the privacy level from a predefined set. We investigate optimal cohort configurations and uncover insights about utility convexity, enabling the identification of privacy-utility balanced settings. Our proposed mechanism, called UD-LDP, empowers users, promotes transparency, and facilitates suitable privacy budget selection. We demonstrate the effectiveness of cohortisation through experiments on synthetic and real-world datasets. • We propose a cohortisation mechanism that allows users to choose a privacy budget that closely matches their requirements. This work aligns users’ intrinsic value of privacy to tangible privacy budgets in LDP. • Our empirical studies using both real-world and synthetic datasets demonstrate that UD-LDP enhances the utility of LDP. We use RAPPOR, randomized response and heavy hitter analysis to demonstrate this effect. • We show that there exist an optimum number of cohorts, that gives the best utility and also show how to identify that number. The optimal number of cohorts provides valuable insights for practitioners aiming to strike the right balance between privacy and utility. • Ultimately, UD-LDP promotes transparency, user autonomy, and increased participation in crowd-sourced data collections for statistical purposes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Future Generation Computer Systems
Published
2025-01-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2025.107712
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

UD-LDP: A Technique for optimally catalyzing user driven Local Differential Privacy

Tanveer Zia, Md Zahidul Islam, Gnanakumar Thedchanamoorthy, Meisam Mohammady et al.
1 citations
Future Generation Computer Systems
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
2.48
article

UD-LDP: A Technique for optimally catalyzing user driven Local Differential Privacy

Tanveer Zia, Md Zahidul Islam, Gnanakumar Thedchanamoorthy, Meisam Mohammady, Michael Bewong
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Local Differential Privacy (LDP) has emerged as a popular mechanism for crowd-sourced data collection, but enforcing a uniform level of perturbation may hinder the participation of individuals with higher privacy needs, while high privacy levels that satisfy more users can reduce utility. To address this, we propose a cohort-based mechanism that allows participants to choose the privacy level from a predefined set. We investigate optimal cohort configurations and uncover insights about utility convexity, enabling the identification of privacy-utility balanced settings. Our proposed mechanism, called UD-LDP, empowers users, promotes transparency, and facilitates suitable privacy budget selection. We demonstrate the effectiveness of cohortisation through experiments on synthetic and real-world datasets. • We propose a cohortisation mechanism that allows users to choose a privacy budget that closely matches their requirements. This work aligns users’ intrinsic value of privacy to tangible privacy budgets in LDP. • Our empirical studies using both real-world and synthetic datasets demonstrate that UD-LDP enhances the utility of LDP. We use RAPPOR, randomized response and heavy hitter analysis to demonstrate this effect. • We show that there exist an optimum number of cohorts, that gives the best utility and also show how to identify that number. The optimal number of cohorts provides valuable insights for practitioners aiming to strike the right balance between privacy and utility. • Ultimately, UD-LDP promotes transparency, user autonomy, and increased participation in crowd-sourced data collections for statistical purposes.

Future Generation Computer SystemsVol. 166
Charles Sturt University (AU), Iowa State University (US), CO2CRC (AU), The University of Notre Dame Australia (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.