The mysterious case of missing lymphocytes: a cautionary tale of interinstitutional variability in outcomes of lung dissociation protocols

Rigor and reproducibility are vital to scientific advancement. It is unclear whether a protocol optimized for tissue dissociation in one institution performs well universally. Here, we share our brand-new lab's experience with interinstitutional variability that led to the discovery that a protocol optimized for murine lung dissociation at Boston University (BU) fails to reproduce similar CD4<sup>+</sup> T cell, CD8<sup>+</sup> T cell, and B cell outcomes at the University of Michigan at Ann Arbor (U-M). We report that the type 2 collagenase-based protocol from BU yields reduced numbers of lung lymphocytes at U-M, and this appeared to be a result of harsher collagenase activity despite using identical protocols, reagents, and vendors at both institutions. This variability could not be explained by higher Ca<sup>2+</sup> levels in Ann Arbor water (which we posited may heighten the collagenase activity) but instead appeared to be due to technical details within the protocol that led to the protocols behaving in an institution-specific manner. Indeed, we find that merely switching between the protocol from BU and a newly optimized protocol at U-M was sufficient to improve (or worsen) lymphocyte yields from murine lungs when synchronously performed at both institutions. Taken together, although the reason(s) for the interinstitutional variability in lymphocyte outcomes remains unknown, this report serves as a cautionary tale against directly adopting lung dissociation protocols across institutions without reoptimization, and calls for careful inspection of cross-institutional reproducibility of previously described protocols.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> Rigor and reproducibility are vital to scientific advancement. It is unclear whether a protocol optimized for tissue dissociation in one institution performs well universally. Here, the authors share their experience with interinstitutional variability that led to the discovery that a protocol optimized for murine lung dissociation in one institution failed to reproduce similar lymphocyte outcomes elsewhere. This report, thus, serves as a cautionary tale against directly adopting tissue dissociation protocols across institutions without reoptimization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Physiology-Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology
Published
2025-01-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1152/ajplung.00323.2024
Primary Topic
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The mysterious case of missing lymphocytes: a cautionary tale of interinstitutional variability in outcomes of lung dissociation protocols

Vijay Raaj Ravi, Anukul T. Shenoy, Elise Armstrong, Joseph P. Mizgerd et al.
American Journal of Physiology-Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
article

The mysterious case of missing lymphocytes: a cautionary tale of interinstitutional variability in outcomes of lung dissociation protocols

Vijay Raaj Ravi, Anukul T. Shenoy, Elise Armstrong, Joseph P. Mizgerd, Olivia Harlow, Nathan L. Sanders, Fang Ke
article en

Abstract

Rigor and reproducibility are vital to scientific advancement. It is unclear whether a protocol optimized for tissue dissociation in one institution performs well universally. Here, we share our brand-new lab's experience with interinstitutional variability that led to the discovery that a protocol optimized for murine lung dissociation at Boston University (BU) fails to reproduce similar CD4<sup>+</sup> T cell, CD8<sup>+</sup> T cell, and B cell outcomes at the University of Michigan at Ann Arbor (U-M). We report that the type 2 collagenase-based protocol from BU yields reduced numbers of lung lymphocytes at U-M, and this appeared to be a result of harsher collagenase activity despite using identical protocols, reagents, and vendors at both institutions. This variability could not be explained by higher Ca<sup>2+</sup> levels in Ann Arbor water (which we posited may heighten the collagenase activity) but instead appeared to be due to technical details within the protocol that led to the protocols behaving in an institution-specific manner. Indeed, we find that merely switching between the protocol from BU and a newly optimized protocol at U-M was sufficient to improve (or worsen) lymphocyte yields from murine lungs when synchronously performed at both institutions. Taken together, although the reason(s) for the interinstitutional variability in lymphocyte outcomes remains unknown, this report serves as a cautionary tale against directly adopting lung dissociation protocols across institutions without reoptimization, and calls for careful inspection of cross-institutional reproducibility of previously described protocols.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> Rigor and reproducibility are vital to scientific advancement. It is unclear whether a protocol optimized for tissue dissociation in one institution performs well universally. Here, the authors share their experience with interinstitutional variability that led to the discovery that a protocol optimized for murine lung dissociation in one institution failed to reproduce similar lymphocyte outcomes elsewhere. This report, thus, serves as a cautionary tale against directly adopting tissue dissociation protocols across institutions without reoptimization.

American Journal of Physiology-Lung Cellular and Molecular PhysiologyVol. 328(2)
Boston University (US), University of Michigan (US)
University of Michigan, National Institutes of Health, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studies, University of Michigan, Medical School, University of Michigan, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.