Copper sulfate treatment harms zooplankton and ultimately promotes algal blooms: A field mesocosm experiment

Excess nutrient loading often promotes harmful algal blooms. Despite many past studies, few algal bloom control methods show clear, long-term improvements in water quality. For example, chemical treatments are often used to control algal blooms because they can cause large, rapid declines in algal abundance. However, these effects are often transient requiring future treatments that increase costs and risks to water quality. Moreover, empirical tests of repeated applications or combinations of different treatments are rare, even with their common use across industries, like aquaculture and drinking water. To rigorously test the effects of single or combined treatments on water quality in a eutrophic aquaculture pond, copper sulfate pentahydrate (henceforth called copper) and Phoslock were used independently (full dose) or combined (each at half dose) in a 56-day field experiment conducted in a hypereutrophic aquaculture pond. The two copper-containing treatments caused rapid declines (-83%) in algal abundance the day after treatment followed by very large (2,617%) increases after another five days. In contrast, zooplankton were reduced by 43% in the copper treatment but minimally affected (+1%) by the combined treatment the day after application. To further show that copper treatment is the mechanism responsible for the negative effects on zooplankton and phytoplankton, half of the mesocosms for all four treatments were treated with a full dose of copper on day 13 and similar effects on phytoplankton were observed as when copper was initially applied. The combined treatment was more effective at controlling phytoplankton than the copper only treatment, in part, because of lesser negative effects on zooplankton. Overall, this experiment further highlights the long-term, negative effects that chemical treatments, like copper, have on non-target taxa, such as beneficial zooplankton, which limits their potential for ecological and sustainable control of harmful algal blooms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Harmful Algae
Published
2025-01-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hal.2025.102800
Citations
15
Primary Topic
Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.90

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Copper sulfate treatment harms zooplankton and ultimately promotes algal blooms: A field mesocosm experiment

Angelea P. Belfiore, Suzanne E Tenison, Alan E. Wilson, Matthew F. Gladfelter et al.
15 citations
Harmful Algae
Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
12.90
article

Copper sulfate treatment harms zooplankton and ultimately promotes algal blooms: A field mesocosm experiment

Angelea P. Belfiore, Suzanne E Tenison, Alan E. Wilson, Matthew F. Gladfelter, Saranya S. Anantapantula, Hannah M. Zinnert, Susanne Wittenzeller
article en
15 citations

Abstract

Excess nutrient loading often promotes harmful algal blooms. Despite many past studies, few algal bloom control methods show clear, long-term improvements in water quality. For example, chemical treatments are often used to control algal blooms because they can cause large, rapid declines in algal abundance. However, these effects are often transient requiring future treatments that increase costs and risks to water quality. Moreover, empirical tests of repeated applications or combinations of different treatments are rare, even with their common use across industries, like aquaculture and drinking water. To rigorously test the effects of single or combined treatments on water quality in a eutrophic aquaculture pond, copper sulfate pentahydrate (henceforth called copper) and Phoslock were used independently (full dose) or combined (each at half dose) in a 56-day field experiment conducted in a hypereutrophic aquaculture pond. The two copper-containing treatments caused rapid declines (-83%) in algal abundance the day after treatment followed by very large (2,617%) increases after another five days. In contrast, zooplankton were reduced by 43% in the copper treatment but minimally affected (+1%) by the combined treatment the day after application. To further show that copper treatment is the mechanism responsible for the negative effects on zooplankton and phytoplankton, half of the mesocosms for all four treatments were treated with a full dose of copper on day 13 and similar effects on phytoplankton were observed as when copper was initially applied. The combined treatment was more effective at controlling phytoplankton than the copper only treatment, in part, because of lesser negative effects on zooplankton. Overall, this experiment further highlights the long-term, negative effects that chemical treatments, like copper, have on non-target taxa, such as beneficial zooplankton, which limits their potential for ecological and sustainable control of harmful algal blooms.

Harmful AlgaeVol. 142
Goodyear (United Kingdom) (GB), Auburn University (US)
Agricultural Research Service, Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station, Division of Biological Infrastructure, Division of Environmental Biology
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
12.90
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.