Provider Practices and Perceived Barriers and Facilitators in Improving Quality Practices in Radiation Oncology Peer Review
Participants in radiation oncology acknowledged the importance of peer review, but there was significant variation in the perceived benefits. A higher value was placed on the alignment of clinical practice and nonphysician participant education. Future processes to improve communication and prospective plan review were identified as beneficial to peer review-mediated plan changes.
Authors
- Jean L. Wright (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5775-6544)
- Suzanne Evans
- Sara R. Alcorn (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4620-5047)
- Khinh Ranh Voong (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7753-1211)
- Ori Shokek
- Todd McNutt (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1569-2922)
- Leslie Chang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5963-054X)
Institutions
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Johns Hopkins Medicine (US)
- Yale University (US)
- WellSpan Health (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Advances in Radiation Oncology
- Published
- 2025-01-09
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2024.101708
- Primary Topic
- Advances in Oncology and Radiotherapy
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00