Metabolic syndrome and risk of incident dementia in EPIC‐Norfolk: the role of age and exposure duration

Abstract Background Metabolic syndrome (MetS) might be a modifiable risk factor for dementia. However, the impact of mid‐life versus late‐life MetS and the duration living with MetS on dementia risk remains underexplored. This study investigated whether the association between MetS and risk of dementia differs across mid‐life versus late‐life, and to explore how duration of MetS influences this risk. Method We conducted a prospective study using data from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer—Norfolk (EPIC‐Norfolk). In full cohort analyses, we studied 20,150 dementia‐free adults aged ≥50 years who attended baseline assessments. Group‐based trajectory analysis was performed on 12,756 participants who attended ≥2 health assessments over 20 years. MetS was defined as the presence of ≥3 of the following: elevated waist‐circumference, triglycerides, blood‐pressure, HbA1c, or reduced HDL‐cholesterol. Incident all‐cause dementia was ascertained using hospital inpatient, death, and mental healthcare records. Result The mean (standard deviation [SD]) age of participants was 62.6 (7.5) years, and 54% were female. Over 25 years of follow‐up (mean 18.8 [SD 6.3]), 2,653 participants developed dementia. In the overall cohort (all ages: 50‐79 years), MetS was associated with an increased risk of dementia (Hazard‐Ratio [HR], 1.11, 95% Confidence‐Interval [CI]: 1.01‐1.21). Age‐specific analyses revealed that this risk only remained in those with late mid‐life MetS (age 60‐69: HR, 1.21, 95%CI: 1.05‐1.39) but not in early mid‐life (age 50‐59: HR, 1.12, 95%CI: 0.87‐1.43) or late‐life (age 70‐79: HR, 0.96, 95%CI: 0.81‐1.14). An increasing number of MetS components was also associated with heightened dementia risk, specifically in late mid‐life ( P trend = 0.004). Those with a prolonged duration of MetS had a 26% increased risk of developing dementia (HR 1.26, 95%CI: 1.13‐1.40) when compared to those with consistently low MetS. No association was found for increasing MetS (HR, 1.01, 95%CI: 0.88‐1.17). Conclusion Late mid‐life MetS was associated with a significantly increased risk of developing dementia. A prolonged duration of living with MetS also elevated dementia risk. These findings provide insights regarding critical periods of dementia risk in the context of MetS, and highlight the importance of not only considering the presence/absence of MetS, but also exposure duration when devising dementia prevention strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.094616
Primary Topic
Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Metabolic syndrome and risk of incident dementia in EPIC‐Norfolk: the role of age and exposure duration

Shabina Hayat, Robert Talarico, Elżbieta Kuźma, Robert Luben et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
article

Metabolic syndrome and risk of incident dementia in EPIC‐Norfolk: the role of age and exposure duration

Shabina Hayat, Robert Talarico, Elżbieta Kuźma, Robert Luben, Naomi E. Allen, Thomas J. Littlejohns, Danial Qureshi
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Metabolic syndrome (MetS) might be a modifiable risk factor for dementia. However, the impact of mid‐life versus late‐life MetS and the duration living with MetS on dementia risk remains underexplored. This study investigated whether the association between MetS and risk of dementia differs across mid‐life versus late‐life, and to explore how duration of MetS influences this risk. Method We conducted a prospective study using data from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer—Norfolk (EPIC‐Norfolk). In full cohort analyses, we studied 20,150 dementia‐free adults aged ≥50 years who attended baseline assessments. Group‐based trajectory analysis was performed on 12,756 participants who attended ≥2 health assessments over 20 years. MetS was defined as the presence of ≥3 of the following: elevated waist‐circumference, triglycerides, blood‐pressure, HbA1c, or reduced HDL‐cholesterol. Incident all‐cause dementia was ascertained using hospital inpatient, death, and mental healthcare records. Result The mean (standard deviation [SD]) age of participants was 62.6 (7.5) years, and 54% were female. Over 25 years of follow‐up (mean 18.8 [SD 6.3]), 2,653 participants developed dementia. In the overall cohort (all ages: 50‐79 years), MetS was associated with an increased risk of dementia (Hazard‐Ratio [HR], 1.11, 95% Confidence‐Interval [CI]: 1.01‐1.21). Age‐specific analyses revealed that this risk only remained in those with late mid‐life MetS (age 60‐69: HR, 1.21, 95%CI: 1.05‐1.39) but not in early mid‐life (age 50‐59: HR, 1.12, 95%CI: 0.87‐1.43) or late‐life (age 70‐79: HR, 0.96, 95%CI: 0.81‐1.14). An increasing number of MetS components was also associated with heightened dementia risk, specifically in late mid‐life ( P trend = 0.004). Those with a prolonged duration of MetS had a 26% increased risk of developing dementia (HR 1.26, 95%CI: 1.13‐1.40) when compared to those with consistently low MetS. No association was found for increasing MetS (HR, 1.01, 95%CI: 0.88‐1.17). Conclusion Late mid‐life MetS was associated with a significantly increased risk of developing dementia. A prolonged duration of living with MetS also elevated dementia risk. These findings provide insights regarding critical periods of dementia risk in the context of MetS, and highlight the importance of not only considering the presence/absence of MetS, but also exposure duration when devising dementia prevention strategies.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 20(S8)
Universität Hamburg (DE), University of Cambridge (GB), University of Oxford (GB), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE), Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (CA), University College London (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.